Cases

813 So.2d 1254 (2002) Sherry NETHERLAND, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ETHICON, INC., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Hospital Services Corp., Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc., Owens & Minor, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, Willis-Knighton Health System, Defendant-Applicant. No. 35,229-CW. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. April 5, 2002.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ FIREXO, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appella

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AQUA PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2015-1177 _______________

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. Defendant Northridge Dialysis Center (“Northridge”), a California dialysis clinic, moves to dismiss claims against it by a California plaintiff, Josephine Arballo. Arballo moves to remand the entire case to California state court, and the Fresenius defendants (“FMCNA”) seek to keep the case as part of this multi-district litigation (“MDL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge Before the Court are the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. ("Finjan") seeks summary judgment that Defendant Blue Coat Systems, Inc.'s ("Blue Coat") Internet security software products infringe one of its patents and that several of its patents are not invalid. Blue Coat seeks summary judgment that certain of its products do not infringe several

MEMORANDUM GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge. I.INTRODUCTION In this correction of inventorship action, plaintiffs W. Norman Scott, M.D., (“Dr. Scott”) and Giles R. Scuderi, M.D., (“Dr. Scuderi” or collectively, “the plaintiffs”) seek to add themselves as inventors of U.S. Patent No. 6,123,729, U.S. Patent No. 6,402,786, and U.S. Patent No. 6,319,283 (“the patents”) presently assig

507 F.Supp.2d 883 (2007) TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. eSPEED, INC., eSpeed International, Ltd., Ecco LLC, and Ecco Ware Ltd., Defendants. Trading Technologies International, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Refco Group Ltd., LLC, et al., Defendants. Rosenthal Collins Croup, LLC, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. Trading Technologies International, Inc., Defendant — Counterclaimant, Trading Technologies

666 F.Supp.2d 820 (2009) SAINT GOBAIN AUTOVER USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. XINYI GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:06CV2781. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. October 12, 2009. *822 Kip T. Bollin, Matthew D. Ridings, Thompson Hine, Cleveland, OH, William T. Enos, Andrew K. Bev

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .....................................987 A. Factual Background...................................................987 B. Procedural

CARAWAY, J. 11After a lamp caused a fire in an insured’s home in 2003, the insurer timely filed suit against the retail seller of the lamp under the Louisiana Products Liability Act, La. R.S. 9:2800.51, et seq. (the “Act”), seeking to recover the amounts tendered to the insured. The seller had placed a label on the lamp identifying the seller as a distributor of the product. No other party was identified by the labeling inf

909 F.Supp. 465 (1995) INSULTHERM, INC. v. TANK INSULATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. TANK INSULATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. INSULTHERM, INC., Thermacon, Inc., and Mark A. McBride. Civ. A. Nos. G-93-558, G-95-348. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. November 30, 1995. *466 Stephen D. Dellett, Arnold

323 F.Supp.2d 227 (2004) INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH and Unipath Diagnostics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ACON LABORATORIES, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.A.03-11323 PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 16, 2004. *228 *229 *230

293 B.R. 586 (2003) In re AI REALTY MARKETING OF NEW YORK, INC., Laser Acquisition Corp., DDG I, Inc., Sunbeam Americas Holdings, Ltd., et al., Debtors. Sunbeam Products, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd., Defendant-Counterclaimant. Bankruptcy No. 01-40252 (AJG). Adversary No. 01-2439(AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the district court’s order dismissing Counts I, II and III of plaintiffs’ complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that they did not violate the Lanham Act, the Illinois Deceptive Practices Act or the Illinois common law by selling a drug of the same color and dosage as one

FILED May 31, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGIN

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

11/06/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 18, 2019 Session WALTER JOSHLIN ET AL. v. HOLLIS H. HALFORD, III M.D. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000263-13 James F. Russell, Judge ___

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KULWINDER KAUR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No.: N19C-07-117 PEL v. ) ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ) (d/b/a MANSFIELD SCIENTIFIC, INC. & ) MICROVA

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Jule Hannah (A-44-24) (089819) Argued October 9, 2025 -- Decided April 16, 2026 JUSTICE PIERRE-LOUIS, writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court considers

MEMORANDUM DIAMOND, District Judge. In this products liability action, Debra Johnson alleges that over 50 years ago, thalidomide — a morning sickness medication manufactured and distributed by Defendants — caused her to suffer severe birth defects. Because the governing one-year limitations period has long expired, I will grant summary judgment and dismiss Plaintiffs claims as time-barred.