Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for *948Summary Judgment, filed April 11, 2013 (Doc. 8). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Defendants violated Plaintiff Fred Dean Chavez’ constitutional rights by in

(2008) Terry HILLBLOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants. No. CV F 07-1467 LJO SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 4, 2008. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' F.R.Civ.P. 12 MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Defendant

194 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2002) Vicky L. GETZ, Plaintiff, v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF SHAWNEE, KANSAS; and Barbara Fisher and Theresa Schwartz, in their individual capacities and as employees of Shawnee County, Kansas, Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-2116-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 8, 2002. *

URBIGKIT, Justice, dissenting. I. THE ISSUE IN PERSPECTIVE This case questions whether society provides a remedy when public officials commit perjury, suborn perjury and acknowledge commission of perjury in the pointless and almost random incarceration of a person without justification. In refusing to consider only disbarment, censure or criminal prosecution, none of which will occur, I will no

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION SIM LAKE, District Judge. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation, the objections thereto, and the response to the objections, the court is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommenda

716 N.W.2d 657 (2006) STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Ronald Joseph LEMMER, Respondent. No. A05-2481. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 20, 2006. *659 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Patrick J. Ciliberto, Scott County Attorney, Michael J. Groh, Assistant County Attorney, Shakopee, MN, for appellant. Jef

*653OPINION MEYER, Justice. Following his arrest for boating while impaired, appellant Ronald Joseph Lem-mer challenged the administrative revocation of his driver’s license as permitted under Minnesota’s implied consent law. After an implied consent hearing, the district court concluded that the deputy sheriff did not have a particularized and object

Opinion issued June 25, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00385-CR ——————————— JOSEPH FAREK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Case: 23-60321 Document: 113-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60321 ____________

649 F.Supp.2d 440 (2009) Nathan NEWHARD, Plaintiff, v. Matt BORDERS, Unnamed Town of Culpeper Police Officers 1-100, Scott Barlow, and Town of Culpeper Police Department, Defendants. Civil No. 3:09CV00020. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. September 2, 2009. *443 Emmett Franklin Robinson, Law

ORDER ON CITY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARSHA J. PECHMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants the City of Bothell and Bothell Police Department Detective A. Sean Ungvarsky. (Dkt. No. 24.) Having reviewed the motion, Plaintiffs opposition (Dkt. No. 31), Defendants’ reply (Dkt. No. 33), and all related filings (Dkt. Nos. 25, 26, 32),

Thomas H. Newton, Judge The Rollers appeal the trial court’s declaratory judgment denying coverage for property damage to the Rollers’ garage incurred by á fire started by Mr. Roller in a suicide attempt. American Modern Home Insurance Co. (AMHIC) issued a manufactured homeowners policy to Mr. Roller. As a part of

604 N.W.2d 345 (2000) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Wesley BROOKS, petitioner, Appellant. No. C1-98-2388. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 13, 2000. As Modified March 15, 2000. *346 Samuel A. McCloud, Kelly Vince Griffitts, Shakopee, for appellant. Michael A. Hatch, Minnesota Attorney General, St.

501 F.Supp.2d 978 (2007) Roland J. BOURGEOIS, Plaintiff, v. Larn STRAWN, Defendant. No. 05-10020. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 7, 2007. *979 Fred L. Gibson, Clinton Township, MI, for Plaintiff. James T. Farrell, Michigan Department of Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for Defendant.</

(2008) Roger McCONNELL, Plaintiff, v. Matt McKILLIP, Phillip P. Williams, Jefferey S. Rudoph, Jack W. Dodd, Roger Phillips, Heath Haalek, Shawn J. Haus, Defendants. Roger McConnell, Plaintiff, v. Matt McKillip, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Kokomo; Phillip P. Williams, Jeffery S. Rudolph and Jack W. Dodd, Each Individually and as Members of the Board of Public Works and Safety of the City of Kokomo; K.P.D. Officer Roger Phi

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are two motions for summary judgment: (1) the City Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [filed August 81, 2012; docket # 126 ] filed by Defendants Richard Meyers, Jimmy Rodgers, Jackson Andrews, and the City of Colorado Springs (collectively, the “City Defendants”); and (2) the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment for Inhumane Conditions of Confinement, filed September 6, 2016 (Doc. 156)(“MSJ”); and (ii) the County Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1 — Dismissal of Plaintiffs Substantive Due Process Cl

452 F.Supp.2d 696 (2006) Roland J. BOURGEOIS, Plaintiff, v. Larn STRAWN, Defendant. No. 05-10020-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. August 31, 2006. *697 *698 *699 Fred L. Gibson, Clinton Township, MI, for Plaintiff.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT C. B., a minor, No. 11-17454 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:09-cv-00285- AWI-SMS CITY OF SONORA; MACE MCINTOSH, Chief of Police; HAL PROCK, Officer, OPINION Defendants-Ap