Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Indira Talwani, United States District Judge Plaintiff John Francis Gross (“Gross”) seeks judicial review of the final decision by Commissioner of Social Security Carolyn Colvin (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for disability insurance benefits. Following such review, the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum and Order.

WOODWARD, J. A jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Marcus Allen Gross, appellant, of the commission of a theft scheme of property valued over $100,000, theft of property valued between $10,000 and $100,000, and conspiracy to commit theft of property valued over $100,000. Appellant noted this appeal and present

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RHONDA D. CALLAWAY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-308 (JDB-GMH) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Rhonda Callaway challenges the denial of her claim for Social Security Disability Insurance

291 S.W.3d 508 (2009) Johnnie F. COLVIN, Appellant, v. James R. COLVIN, Appellee. No. 12-08-00314-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. July 8, 2009. *510 Douglas J. McCarver, Nacogdoches, for appellant. Paul A. Robbins, for appellee. Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and BASS, J., Retired Justice, Twe

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Chestine Gajos’s motion seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny her application for disability benefits [1, 27]. Plaintiff asks the Court to reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denying her benefits and remand the case to the So

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, C.J. Plaintiff John Duffy, who suffers from neck pain, moves to reverse the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for disability benefits. He argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to properly consider the limited range of motion in his neck. For the reasons set .forth below, the Court DENIES

ORDER JOE HEATON, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Heather D. C. Stanart filed this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for supplemental security income. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(a)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, who recommends that

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Michelle Laracuente, represented by counsel (Binder & Binder), brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. (Dkt. No. 1: Compl.) Presently

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge: On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff Karen Ingrassia (the “Plaintiff’ or the “claimant”) commenced .this .civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405 et seq. (the “Act”), challenging a final determination by the Defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security Carolyn W. Colvin (the “Commissioner”), that she is ineligible

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mary Pat Thynge, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION ■ This action arises from the denial of plaintiffs claims for Social Security benefits. On February 3, 2011, plaintiff filed a Title II application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). D.I. 9 at 29. Plaintiff also filed a Title XVI application for supplemental secu

ORDER Barbara Stahl is seeking disability benefits based on an array of physical and mental problems, including diabetic neuro-pathy, degenerative disc disease, depression, and anxiety. Thus far, her efforts have been unsuccessful. An administrative law judge found that, despite these serious medical conditions, she retains the residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform light work with certain limitations; the district court upheld

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The plaintiff, Gerald Ray, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his application for Disability Insurancé Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2). Mr. Ray asks the court to reverse and remand the Commissioner’s decision, while the Commis

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, Judge, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, Dulcie Renee Ossmann, filed a Complaint in this Court on August 28, 2015, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for Social Security benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et *993seq.

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Napoleon Payne brought this action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits.1 Payne claims that he suffers from chronic pain in his wrists, leaving him unable to work and therefore eligible for disabi

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an action by Pamela J. Woodie (‘Woodie”) appealing the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) determining that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Social Security .disability benefits. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). '

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Menapace has moved to reverse the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner) denying his request to amend his earnings record to include self-employment income for 2004. The Commissioner has moved to affirm her ruling that Menapace cannot rely on his tax return to establi

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marshell E. Antoniolo (“plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-484. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, United States District Judge1 1. INTRODUCTION Jeffrey Mark Dean (“Dean”) brought this action challenging the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner” or the “Agency”) denying his application for a period of disability, disability insurance, and Supplemental Security Incom

MEMORANDUM RICHARD P. CONABOY, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs appeal from the Commissioner’s denial of Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI. (Doc. 1.) She originally alleged disability beginning on October 7, 2011, and later amended the onset date to October 15, 2012. (R

OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Plaintiff, Frenche Salaiz, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In September 2012, the Plaintiff protectively filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits, alleging disability beginning on January 1, 2010. The