Cases

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. WALLACH, Circuit Judge. Appellant ADS Security, L.P. (“ADS”) appeals the opinion and order of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“District Court”) denying ADS’s request for attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 (2012). See Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Prot. Servs., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01431-

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge. Plaintiff brings this diversity of citizenship action alleging that defendant National Guardian Security Services Corporation (“National Guardian”) is liable for damages under theories of negligence and breach of implied warranty based on the failure of a security alarm system at plaintiffs retail clothing store. The case is before the court on N

800 F.Supp.2d 550 (2011) Lewis STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. GUARDIAN SECURITY SERVICES, INC. et al., Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 9632(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 14, 2011. *552 Lewis Stanley, Bronx, NY, for Plaintiff. Ellen August, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP, Samantha Abeysekera, Jackson Lewis LLP, New York, NY

OPINION AND ORDER Philip P. Simon, CHIEF JUDGE Maria Gonzalez and her children were assaulted during a robbery at their home. Gonzalez contends that the security system sold to her and installed by ADT did not function as promised. She has sued ADT and a number of its affiliates as well as an individual named Eric Hardisty, an ADT salesman who sold her the system. This case was originally brought in state

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1343 ___________________________ Guardian Flight LLC Plaintiff Appellant v. Jon Godfread, in his capacity as North Dakota Insurance Commissioner; Wayne Stenehjem, in

*280OPINION OF THE COURT Lucy Billings, J. Plaintiff mother, Marion Hedges, her son Dayton Hedges who accompanied her, and her husband Michael Hedges, suing derivatively and as her guardian ad litem, seek damages for her life changing injuries when two minor customers of the East River Plaza shopping center in New York County threw a shopping cart fro

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI JOM SECURITY SERVICES, REVISIÓN INC. ADMINISTRATIVA procedente de la Recurrente Junta de Subastas del Municipio

258 P.3d 102 (2011) Evelynn FOSTER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ann Davis, Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL GUARDIAN SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellee. No. S-13569. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 19, 2011. *104 Mary A. Gilson and Allison E. Mendel, Mendel & Associates, Anchorage, for Appellant. No appearance by Ap

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ABBIE CRITES-LEONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72) and Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability and Liquidated Damages (Doc. 116). I. Background Plaintiffs comprise a group of current and former employees who worked for Defendant Cov

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge On September 16, 2013, Aaron Alexis, a civilian contractor working as a computer technician at Washington, D.C.’s Navy Yard, used a valid temporary access card to enter Building 197 of the facility and then opened fire on its occupants, killing and wounding several people. In the. wake of that tragedy, se

EMAS, J. Appellant Building Bl, LL'C, appeals from an amended final judgment in favor of Component Repair Services (CRS), following a nonjury trial on appellant’s claim (and appellee’s counterclaim) for breach of a commercial lease agreement. For the reasons that follow, wé affirm, On November 22, 2000, Building Bl (the landlord) and CRS (the tenant) ent

Case: 24-10561 Document: 91-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). (Docs. 3, 19). For the reasons discussed below, the motions are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. The Parties The Defendants are two companies involved in the s

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee at their desks and chatted about their respective weekends. This was the case for Frank K

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR This matter presents issues of Pennsylvania law on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, centering on the reach of Pennsylvania's *10 Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (the "UTPCPL" or the "Law").

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HRH SERVICES LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 23-cv-02300 (JDB) TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises from a contractual dispute between the operators of the Washington, D.C. restaurant The Alibi and the

NO. 12-16-00207-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS THOMAS OILFIELD SERVICES, LLC, § APPEAL FROM THE 97TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ALBERT CLARK, APPELLEE § MONTAGUE COUNTY, TEXAS MEMO

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee at their desks and chatted about their respective weekends. This was the case for Frank Kohl

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District *140 of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The morning of September 16, 2013 started as a typical Monday in the District of Columbia. So it was at the Washington Navy Yard. While some headed to their offices or meetings, others drank their morning coffee at their desks and chatted about their respective weekends. This was the case for Frank Kohl