⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Guru Holding LLC”

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · 2014-08-07 · Published · cited 0× · 40 Pa. D. & C.5th 179
MOTTO, P.J, — Before the court for disposition is the motion for post trial relief filed on behalf defendant, Guru Global Logistics, LLC. These motions consist of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, motion for new trial, remittitur and motion to mold verdict, which raises the following issues: I. Whether defendant is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the o
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-05-10 · Published · cited 7× · 386 F. Supp. 3d 926
Honorable Marvin E. Aspen, United States District Judge *935Before us is Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Maui Jim, Inc.'s ("Maui Jim") motions to dismiss Defendants and Counterclaimants SmartBuy Guru Enterprises, Motion Global Ltd., SmartBuyGlasses Societá a Responsabilitá Limitata, and SmartBuyGlasses Optical Limited's (collectively "SBG") amended counterclaims. (
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-10-20 · Published · cited 3× · 310 F.R.D. 563; 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1662; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143842; 2015 WL 6164157
ORDER Daniel G. Martin, Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [1] is granted in all respects except that Plaintiffs’ request to hold Encore Repair Services, LLC in contempt is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs may re-take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Encore Repair Services, LLC by 11/10/2015. The Court recommends that Encore Repair Services, LLC be required to pay Plaintiffs’ reason
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016-01-11 · Published · cited 18× · 88 Mass. App. Ct. 824; 44 N.E.3d 863
Massing, J. To effect a valid foreclosure sale, the foreclosing mortgage holder must also hold the underlying note or be acting on behalf of the note holder. Eaton v. Federal Natl. Mort. Assn., 462 Mass. 569, 571 (2012) (Eaton). This appeal requires us to consider how a mortgagee may show that it is acting “as the authorize
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2020-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
Reverse and Remanded and Opinion Filed January 29, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00499-CV RENOVATION GURUS, LLC, SADLER HOLDINGS SERIES, LLC, GLAZING GURUS, LLC, ALEX SADLER, RONALD CARLSON, ROMAN ROSALES, JUSTIN WARE,
California Court of Appeal · 2020-06-19 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/21/20 Certified for Publication 6/19/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR RICHARD SIMMONS, et al. B296220 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC708736) v. BAUER MEDIA GROUP USA, LLC, Defendant and Appellant. APPEA
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
07/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 28, 2018 Session SPECIALTYCARE IOM SERVICES, LLC v. MEDSURANT HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 15-695-II Carol L. McCoy, Chancellor ____________
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-08-06 · Published · cited 13× · 7 F.4th 1079
USCA11 Case: 20-11929 Date Filed: 08/06/2021 Page: 1 of 30 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-11929 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-21148-RNS BRYAN BOIGRIS,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-02-09 · Published · cited 42× · 813 F.3d 510; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237; 2016 WL 502714
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge HARRIS joined. BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether the district court erred in dismissing with prejudice a complaint filed by two entities, Andón, LLC, and Reconciling People Together in Faith Ministries, LLC (collectively,
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2018-09-05 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634 ) Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8703 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas S. Oles, Esq. James F. Nagle, Esq.
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/17/2025 7:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009-12-15 · Published · cited 2× · 676 F. Supp. 2d 668; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116556; 2009 WL 5062093
676 F.Supp.2d 668 (2009) Philip J. CHARVAT, Plaintiff, v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, LLC, Defendant. Case No. 2:07-cv-1000. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 15, 2009. *670 John William Ferron, Jessica G. Fallon, Lisa A. Wafer, Ferron & Associates, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Benjamen E. Ker
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-08-21 · Published · cited 2× · 888 F. Supp. 2d 1006; 2012 WL 3705048; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122210
ORDER RE: SCOPE OF THE INJUNC-TIVE RELIEF AND AMOUNT OF MONETARY RELIEF [591] JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN *, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Court previously granted Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s (the FTC) Motion for Summary Judgment (MSJ) *1010against all defendants in this action,
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017-06-05 · Published · cited 3× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 810; 2017 WL 2427297; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85543
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-03-05 · Published · cited 4× · 507 B.R. 114
OPINION MARY D. FRANCE, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the motion of Hari Ram, Inc., (“Debtor”) for the use of cash collateral (the “Motion”). Debtor concedes that Magnolia Portfolio, LLC (“Magnolia”) holds a mortgage and is perfected by an assignment of rents and a UCC financing statement. Debtor asserts, however, that the hotel room revenues are property of the estate and that it has offered t
District Court, N.D. California · 2005-04-28 · Published · cited 3× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 927; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11445; 2005 WL 1018008
366 F.Supp.2d 927 (2005) NORTH PACIFICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PACIFICA, et al., Defendants. No. C-01-4823 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 28, 2005. Jaquelynn C. Pope, Mark D. Warshaw, Hermosa Beach, CA, for Plaintiff. Kevin Drake Siegel, Benjamin Louis Stock, Megan Holt Matthew, Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, Natalie Elsa West, Oak
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010-07-21 · Published · cited 11× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 1320; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73461
727 F.Supp.2d 1320 (2010) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. RCA CREDIT SERVICES, LLC a Florida Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case No. 8:08-CV-2062-T-27AEP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 21, 2010. *1324 James L. Chen, K. Michelle Grajales, Peter W. Lamberton, Federal Trade Commission, Wa
Puri v. Khalsapublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 2018-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 321 F. Supp. 3d 1233
MOSMAN, Chief United States District Judge *1237This matter comes before me on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [389] and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [390]. The parties also filed several motions to strike. [418, 424, 428]. For the reasons below, I GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [390], DENY Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summ
District Court, D. Delaware · 2010-07-30 · Published · cited 0× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 337; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77273; 2010 WL 3001775
727 F.Supp.2d 337 (2010) CIF LICENSING, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing, Plaintiff, v. AGERE SYSTEMS INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-170-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 30, 2010. *342 Joel M. Freed, Esquire and Michael W. Connelly, Esquire of McDermott Will & Emery of Washington, D.C.,Philip A. Rovner, Esqui
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-07-28 · Published · cited 674× · 653 F.3d 820; 2011 WL 3198226
OPINION KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Defendants own and manage DMV.org, a for-profit website with a mission to save you “time, money and even a trip to the DMV!” DMV.org, Home Page, http://www. dmv.org (last visited Feb. 28, 2011). Consumers visit DMV.org for help renewing driver’s licenses, buying car insurance, viewing driving records, beating traffic ticket