Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gutierrez v. Casa Central Social Services Corporation”
Trump v. CASA, Inc.public domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 831–941 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Trump v. CASA, Inc.public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 6/27/25public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 6/27/25public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 7/02/25public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI MIGUEL ELÍAS APELACIÓN GUTIÉRREZ CENTENO Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelante Instancia, Sala Superior de San v. KLAN2
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 3, 2025 Decided April 24, 2026 No. 25-5243 REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEES v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., APPELLANTS
Kui Myles v. United Statespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KUI Z. MYLES, No. 20-55910 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:19-cv-02036- PSG-KK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAVID MARIN; BRIAN DEMORE; FRANCIS M. JACKSON; ARACELI TREVINO; DAVID
United States v. Weispublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. Defendant Helga Weis (“Weis”) is charged in a three-count indictment with conspiracy to commit robbery and attempting to knowingly commit a robbery, both in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), (2). Weis filed a noti
Boykin v. Fentypublic domain
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the District of Columbia’s motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. 1 The plaintiffs are a group of homeless men who claim that the District’s closure of La Casa Shelter, wher
Crowe v. Federal Bureau of Prisonspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) VANESSA CROWE & GLEN GALEMMO, ) on behalf of themselves and others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOCTORS FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-322 (JDB) OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case involves government officials acting first and thinking later. On January 20, 2025, the President issued Execu
Epic Games, Inc. v. Google LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL
Rosario Rivera v. PS Group of Puerto Rico, Inc.public domain
186 F.Supp.2d 63 (2002) Mayra ROSARIO RIVERA, Plaintiff, v. PS GROUP OF PUERTO RICO, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 98-2000(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 30, 2002. *64 Frank D. Inserni-Milam, San Juan, PR, Bruce J. McGiverin, Hato Rey, PR, for Mayra Rosario Rivera. Mayra Rosario Riveria, Guaynabo, P
Trump v. Cookpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Marvin Miranda v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1828 MARVIN DUBON MIRANDA; AJIBADE THOMPSON ADEGOKE; JOSE DE LA CRUZ ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Du
Marvin Miranda v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1828 MARVIN DUBON MIRANDA; AJIBADE THOMPSON ADEGOKE; JOSE DE LA CRUZ ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Du
Pedro Lozano v. City of Hazletonpublic domain
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Chief Judge. This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. The City of Hazleton previously appealed the District Court’s judgment permanently enjoining enforcement of two Hazleton ordinances that attempt to prohibit employment of unautho
Claudio Gotay v. Becton Dickinson Caribe Ltd.public domain
257 F.Supp.2d 498 (2003) Efrain CLAUDIO GOTAY, et al Plaintiffs v. BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD, et al Defendants No. CIV. 01-1088(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 10, 2003. *500 Alberto G. Estrella, Antonio E. Valiente and Kenneth C. Suria-Rivera, Esqs. William Estrella Law Firm, Enrique A. Mirandes, Esq.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. I The appellant, State-Operated School. District of the City of Newark (State District), challenges a decision of the Law Division judge affirming an arbitration award in favor of the City Association of Supervisors and Administrators (CASA). The dispute concerns claimed vacation entitlements under a collective bargaining agreement p