⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “H Melton Ventures LLC”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 24, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00245-CV ——————————— JOHNNIE MELTON AND SHELLEY MELTON, Appellants V. BIG CREEK CONSTRUCTION, LTD. AND WFM
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 723 S.E.2d 672; 290 Ga. 719; 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 951; 2012 WL 933084; 2012 Ga. LEXIS 291
723 S.E.2d 672 (2012) 290 Ga. 719 SEIZ JOINT VENTURE, LLC v. SEIZ. No. S11F1840. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 19, 2012. *673 Cohen, Pollock, Merlin, Axelrod & Small, Kevin Timothy O'Sullivan, Atlanta, for appellant. Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler, Richardson & Davis, Ivy Stewart Duggan, F
Melton v. Meltonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-11-01 · Published · cited 2× · 2013 Ohio 4790
[Cite as Melton v. Melton, 2013-Ohio-4790.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO PATRICIA L. MELTON, : APPEAL NO. C-130123 TRIAL NO. DR-0901452 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : O P I N I
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 477 P.3d 1177; 2020 OK CIV APP 57
GRILLO VENTURES v. VU Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 283 F.R.D. 280; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87205; 2012 WL 2390012
ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motion for Class Certification, Doc. # 69, filed by Plaintiff Gladys S. Melton, by Ernie Dutton her power of attorney, on behalf of other persons similarly situated (“Plaintiff’) on October 25, 2011. Defendant Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. (“PEC” or “Defendant”) filed a response
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-06-06 · Published · cited 57× · 754 F.3d 272; 2014 WL 2565661
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on Appellant Bluebonnet Hotel Ventures’ (“Bluebonnet”) claim for rescission of contract. For the following reasons, we affirm. BACKGROUND Bluebonnet is a single-purpose corporat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 64 F. App'x 631
MEMORANDUM** Plaintiff Checkout Holdings, LLC, sued Defendant Amplified Holdings, Inc., and several of its officers, following a transaction in which Defendant purchased some of Plaintiffs assets in exchange for stock in Defendant. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion, dismissing Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. A
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04583
Plymouth Capital, LLC v Montage Fin. Group, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 04583) Plymouth Capital, LLC v Montage Fin. Group, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 04583 Decided on September 25, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-09-29 · Published · cited 15× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 1316
JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1322THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint and Derivative Complaint for, inter alia , lack of subject matter jurisdiction [ECF No. 48], Plaintiffs' Response in opposition [ECF No. 49], and Defendants' corresponding Reply [
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014-12-05 · Published · cited 6× · 522 B.R. 41; 2014 WL 6879248
SIPA LIQUIDATION (Substantively Consolidated) MEMORANDUM DECISION AFFIRMING APPLICATION OF THE TRUSTEE’S INTER-ACCOUNT METHOD TO THE DETERMINATION OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN BLMIS ACCOUNTS STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: The motion before the Court (the “Motion ”) concerns the appropriate methodology for computing the “net equity” in a customer accou
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-07-06 · Published · cited 59× · 526 S.W.3d 709; 2017 WL 2882197; 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 6146
OPINION Kevin Jewell, Justice In this contract dispute between a general contractor, CTC Contractors,' LLO, and a subcontractor, Vast Construction, LLC, appellant Vast challenges the judgment in favor of appellee CTC. The judgment is based on a jury finding that Vast failed to comply with the- subcontract. First, Vast asserts that it is entitled to either (1) rendition of judgment in its favor because it est
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012-01-23 · Published · cited 11× · 290 Ga. 386; 722 S.E.2d 44; 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 187; 2012 Ga. LEXIS 76
THOMPSON, Justice. Appellants Grossi Consulting and its principal, Stefano Grossi (jointly “Grossi”), appeal the grant of an interlocutory injunction in favor of appellees, Sterling Currency Group and its principals, Jim Shaw and Ty Rhame (jointly “Sterling”), contending the trial court erred by entering an interlocutory injunction that fails to preserve the status quo. Finding no abuse of the trial court’s discretion, we af
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-05-18 · Published · cited 2× · 196 So. 3d 37; 184 Oil & Gas Rep. 292; 2016 WL 2903566; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 992
GARRETT, J. 11 This matter involves a dispute over the proper interpretation to be given to a depth limitation clause contained in a large sale of mineral interests in 2008, from International Paper Company (“IP”) to Chesapeake Royalty, LLC (“Chesapeake”). The plaintiff here, BRP, LLC (“BRP”), later acquired mineral interests from IP and brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it owned all of the Bossier Shale
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2019-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00363-CV Ben Melton, Appellant v. CU Members Mortgage, a Division of Colonial Savings F. A.; and First Western Title Co., Appellees FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C130102C, THE HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009-11-13 · Published · cited 28× · 42 So. 3d 65; 2009 Ala. LEXIS 267; 2009 WL 3805712
42 So.3d 65 (2009) David BARBER, Emory Folmar, and Christopher Murphy v. CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY OUTREACH, INC., and Freedom Trail Ventures, Ltd. Governor Bob Riley v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc., and Freedom Trail Ventures, Ltd. 1080805 and 1080806. Supreme Court of Alabama. November 13, 2009. Rehearing Applications Denied January 29, 2010.<
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2020-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) ECC International, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58875 ) Under Contract No. W917PM-07-D-0015-0006 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael A. Richard, Esq. Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered September 23, 2020. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,564-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** PRI
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 143 So. 3d 208; 2013 WL 4034500; 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 178
THOMAS, Judge, concurring in the result. Although I agree that the judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court affirming the award by the State Health Planning and Development Agency (“SHPDA”) through the Certificate of Need Review Board (“CONRB”) of a Certificate of Need (“CON”) to Brookwood Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Brookwood Medical Center (“Brookwood”) to construct a freestanding emergency department (“
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 162 So. 3d 931; 2014 WL 3796408
PITTMAN, Judge. In these consolidated appeals, the Alabama State Health Planning and Development Agency (“SHPDA”) and ACE Home Health Care, LLC, appeal from a judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in two administrative appeals brought by Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (“Gentiva”), and Amedisys Home Health, Inc., of Alabama (“Amedisys”) in which the circuit court reversed the decision of SHPDA’s Certificate of Nee
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 193 So. 3d 751; 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 218
THOMAS, Judge. Select Specialty Hospitals, Inc., d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital-Birmingham (“Select”), has operated a 38-bed, long-term acute-care hospital (“LTACH”) on the campus of the general acute-care hospital operated by Affinity Hospital, LLC, d/b/a Trinity Medical Center of Birmingham (“Trinity”), since 2002.1 Trinity is relocating its hospital, and it informed Select that it would not hav