Cases

11 A.3d 1180 (2010) HAMILTON PARTNERS, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. Murry ENGLARD, Howard Berg, Yoram Hacohen, and Yitz Grossman, Defendants, and New York Healthcare, Inc. and The Bio Balance Corp., Nominal Defendants. C.A. No. 4476-VCL. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: September 17, 2010. Decided: December 15, 2010.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD DELMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0679-LWW ) GIGACQUISITIONS3, LLC, AVI ) KATZ, RALUCA DINU, NEIL ) MIOTTO, JOHN MIKULSKY, ) ANDREA BETTI-BERUTTO, and )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KERRY L. ERICKSON; MICHELLE M. LEAHY; RICHARD A. LEAHY; and No. 83287-5-I JOYCE E. MARQUARDT; DIVISION ONE Respondents, PUBLISHED OPINION v. PHARMACIA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, f/k/a Pharmacia Corporation,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 22-1380C, 22-1425C, 22-1436C, 22-1460C, 22-1462C, 22-1477C, 22-1492C, 22-1519C, 22-1549C, and 23-441C Filed: May 3, 2023 Re-issued: June 2, 20231 ________________________________________ ) ALLICENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al., )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO B, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO C, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO E, LLC, ) HUNOBY ENTERPRISES, LLC, and EARL ) P. GALLEHER, III, individually and ) derivatively on behalf of Basho Technologies, ) Inc., ) ) Plaintiff

ACCEPTED 03-15-00252-CV 6435117 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS SEE AMEND BRF AUSTIN, TEXAS

319 B.R. 824 (2005) In re PEMAQUID UNDERWRITING BROKERAGE, INC., Debtor. Pemaquid Underwriting Brokerage, Inc., United Messenger Courier Program and John T. Simon, Plaintiffs, v. D & H Alternative Risk Solutions, Inc., Valley National Bank, Cunningham Lindsey Claims Management, Inc., and XYZ Corp. (fictitious entities), Defendants, v. Legion Insurance Company (in liquidation), Interpleader Defendant. Bankrupt

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, filed March 16, 2016 (Doc. 104)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on September 13, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should award the Plaintiffs, Kenth and Laura Fallen, reasonable attorneys’ fees against Defendant GREP Southw

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1529C Filed: September 4, 2021 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: September 30, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * AGILE-BOT II, LLC, * * Protestor, * v. *

OPINION Walls, Senior District Judge Defendant Express, Dynamics, LLC, d/b/a WorkXpress (“WorkXpress”) moves to dismiss this action, arguing that it is duplicative with ongoing litigation in Pennsylvania and that this Court should abstain. Alternatively, Defendant moves - for the Court to dismiss certain-counts and to stay the action pending a decision in Pennsylvania. Decided without'oral argument under Fe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARLYLE INVESTMENT ) MANAGEMENT L.L.C., TC GROUP, ) L.L.C., TCG HOLDINGS, L.L.C., DAVID ) M. RUBENSTEIN, DANIEL A. ) D‟ANIELLO, WILLIAM E. CONWAY, ) JR., JAMES H. HANCE, JOHN C. ) STOMBER, and MICHAEL J. ZUPON, ) C.A. No. 7841-VCP ) Plaintiffs,

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In March 2013, the board of directors (the “Board”) of Morgans Hotel Group Co. (“Morgans” or the “Company”) approved a two-part recapitalization involving The Yu-caipa Companies, LLC (‘Yucaipa”), an entity controlled by prominent investor Ronald W. Burkle. Despite not owning a mathematical majority of the Company’s common stock, Yucaipa held a combination of securities and

POLSTON, J., concurring in part dissenting in part. I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. Although I use different reason*1229ing, I agree with the majority’s affirmative answer to the certified question of whether commercial fishermen can recover damages for their loss of income pursuant to section 376

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.939 II. JURISDICTION.940 III. BACKGROUND. A. Telecommunication Regulatory Backdrop. 1. Communications Act of 1934 . 2. Anti-trust Litigation. 3. Telecommunications Act of 1996 . 4. The Act: IXCs, ILECs, and CLECs.

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... .712 II. JURISDICTION... .712 III. BACKGROUND... .712 A Telecommunication Regulatory Backdrop .... 712 1. Communications Act of 1934.... 712 2. Anti-trust Litigation.... 713

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting in part and concurring in part opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. In this patent infringement action, R + L Carriers, Inc. (“R + L”) appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of its amended complaints and counterclaims against DriverTech LLC (“DriverTech”), Affiliated Computer

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. In this patent case, Plaintiff TDM America, LLC (“TDM”) claims that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) and other federal agencies, through their contractors, infringed three patents owned by TDM for the processing and treatment of contaminated materials for beneficial reuse. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,542,614 (“the '614 Patent”), 5,7

492 F.Supp.2d 608 (2007) EPICREALM, LICENSING, LLC v. AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., et al. epicRealm, Licensing, LLC v. Franklin Covey Co., et al. Nos. 2:05CV163, 2:05CV356. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. June 26, 2007. *609 *610