Cases

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgments of the district court be AFFIRMED.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2017 MSPB 1 Docket No. SF-0752-15-0165-M-1 Harris L. Winns, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2017 MSPB 1 Docket No. SF-0752-15-0165-M-1 Harris L. Winns, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

230 B.R. 542 (1999) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Appellant, v. Curtis R. HUDSON and George W. Emerson, as Trustee, Appellees. No. 98-2139-TUV. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. February 25, 1999. *543 William W. Siler, U.S. Attorney's Office, Memphis, TN, for United States Postal Service. M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POSTAL POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-2566 (CRC) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is the latest proceeding to raise a long-debated question: What, exactly, is

MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Henry Harris (“Harris”), proceeding pro se, appeals the summary judgment dismissing his employment discrimination action based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Veterans’ Vocational Rehabilitation Act, 38 U.S.C. § 1500 et seq., and

RYA W. ZOBEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *299Coins N' Things, Inc. ("plaintiff"), has sued the United States Postal Service ("defendant" or "USPS") to set aside USPS's deficiency assessment against plaintiff for allegedly unpaid Registered Mail fees. Defendant has moved to dismiss Count I, a claim of equitable estoppel, pursuant to Fed

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2023 MSPB 14 Docket Nos. DC-0752-12-0366-X-1 DC-0752-12-0366-X-2 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2023 MSPB 8 Docket No. DC-0752-11-0867-B-1 Rosemary Jenkins, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2022 MSPB 21 Docket No. AT-0752-17-0162-I-1 Gary L. Thurman, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2022 MSPB 22 Docket No. DC-0752-17-0281-I-1 Franklin Martin, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge: This case concerns conditions under which city mail carriers employed by the United States Postal Service may seek and obtain positions as rural mail carriers for the Postal Service. The conditions in question 'hre imposed by collective bargaining agreements between the Postal Service and the National Rural Letter Carriers Association, the bargaining agent for the • rural carriers’ craft. Cit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Carl Thurston Washington, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging defamation, assault, fraud, property damage, and violations of his civil rights, among other claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims, asserted pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-796Í (1982), alleging the United *335States Postal Service (USPS) unlawfully terminated plaintiffs employment because of his mental handicap, described by plaintiff as nervousness.1 The district

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Zoila Atencio brought this action against the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. (See generally Dkt. No. 23: 2d Am. Compl.) On November 19, 2015, Judge Woods dismissed Atencio’s ADA claims and counts three and four of her Second Amended Com

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Defendant United States Postal Service (“USPS”) appeals from the May 16, 2013 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Katherine B. Forrest, Judge) granting the motion of plaintiff American Postal Workers Union (“APWU”) to vacate an arbitral award on the basis that the arbitrator had

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM ORDER RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs claims against Defendant United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651 et seq. (the “Act”). Plaintiff, the Secretary of Labor (the “Secretary”) allege

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GO, United States Magistrate Judge: This action involves the alleged breach of contractual obligations by defendants in removing toxic wastes from a property (the “Property”) that they sold to plaintiff United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in December, 1986. Plaintiff and defendants have each moved to compel production of documents claimed by the other to be privi

668 F.Supp. 88 (1987) Roberto DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; Cristobal Lliteras, in his official capacity as District Manager Postmaster U.S. P.S., and in his individual capacity; Carlos J. Falu, in his official capacity as District Manager-Customer Services U.S.P.S., and in his individual capacity, Defendants. Civ. No. 85-1683(RLA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.<

ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendant William C. Harris’ Motion to Suppress. (Doc. 23.) For the following reasons, Harris’ Motion to Suppress is GRANTED-in-PART and DENIED-in-PART. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 11, 2014, Defendant was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation