Cases

545 S.W.2d 229 (1976) George W. HARRISON, Appellant, v. Jimmy OLIVER et al., Individually and d/b/a Oliver Brothers, Appellees. No. 16783. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.) December 9, 1976. Rehearing Denied January 6, 1977. W. W. Kilgarlin, Houston, for appellant; Kilgarlin, Dixon & Hancock, Houston, of counsel. Bennet

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On July 25, 2018, the above-captioned matter came on for a bench trial before the Court. Over the next three days, the Court heard testimony from witnesses and received exhibits into evidence. At the conclusion of the trial, the Court directed the parties to submit post-trial briefing on several issues. Those briefs were submitted on August 14, 2018. See Docs. 66, 67. Having <

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Currently before the Court are two dispositive motions and related filings. The *686first motion is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Dale Oliver's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 29), and a Statement of Facts (Doc. 30) and Brief in Support (Doc. 31). Oliver's Motion seeks, inter alia<

OX IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS EX PARTE, WRIT NO. U-1270124-U9A) WRIT NO. U-1271031-UCA) rTA-RRISON OLIVER BAILEY, APPLICANT, WRIT NO. U-127103

OPINION OF THE COURT KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. A state-employed medical professional charged with assessing the clinical progress of a civilly committed sexually violent predator considered this detainee’s First Amendment activities in connection with her recommendation that he not advance to the next phase of his treatment program. On interlocutory appeal,

73 So.3d 1145 (2011) Scott HARRISON and Mona Harrison v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF the CITY OF BATESVILLE and Memphis Stone & Gravel Company. No. 2009-CT-00981-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 3, 2011. *1147 Paul B. Watkins, Jr., Pope S. Mallette, Oxford, attorneys for appellants. Benjamin E. Griffith,

BRYAN, Judge. Gary Harrison and Patsy Harrison appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Family Home Builders, LLC (“FHB”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. Factual Background and Procedural History On January 5, 2007, the Harrisons and FHB entered into a written contract (“the contract”) in which FHB agreed to perform remodeling and construction work (“the w

PER CURIAM. Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Oliver v. Braxton, No. CA-01-121-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 200

73 So.3d 1169 (2011) Scott HARRISON and Mona Harrison, Appellants v. MAYOR & BOARD OF ALDERMAN OF the CITY OF BATESVILLE and Memphis Stone & Gravel Company, Appellees. No. 2009-CA-00981-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. October 26, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 22, 2011. Paul Bowie Watkins Jr., Pope Shannon Mallette, Oxford, attorneys for

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff Sharon M. Harrison (“Harrison”) brings this employment discrimination and retaliation action against her employer, the Office of the Architect of the Capitol (the “AOC”). After discovery concluded, the AOC filed a [32] Motion for Summary Judgment.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The plaintiff Joseph Naccarato (the “plaintiff’ or “Naccarato”) commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on or about April 30, 1993. Naccarato claimed that his rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when he was arrested by the defendant William Oliver (the “defendant” or “Oliver”), who, at the time, was an off duty New York Stat

404 U. S. 1061. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

[Cite as State v. Oliver, 2021-Ohio-1247.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID OLIVER, Defendant-Appe

PER CURIAM: Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CP-01757-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ZONA APPELLANTS MAE OLIVER, DECEASED: SANDRA JEAN OLIVER AND JAMES HOWARD OLIVER v. JAMES C. OLIVER JR., TERRY MICHAEL APPELLEES CARNEY JR., AND MELISSA M. CARNEY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/14/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI B. DANIELS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHANCERY

The proponent of a will appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County holding that the estate of Daisy Virginia Speer, deceased, should be administered as an intestate estate and confirming the letters of administration granted by the probate court to Mae S. Bird. The following pertinent facts are undisputed: Daisy Virginia Speer executed a will in November 1989, in which she named Katherine Crapps Harrison as the main beneficiary of her estate. The o

23 Kan. App.2d 510 (1997) 934 P.2d 144 In the Matter of the Estate of ALTA E. OLIVER, Deceased. LENARD MILLER and CHARLENE MILLER, Appellants, v. VELDA FISCHER, Executor of the Estate of ALTA E. OLIVER, Appellee. Nos. 73,975, 74,669. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed February 21, 1997. *511

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 16 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-16-13 Opinion Delivered January 18, 2017 MICHAEL OLIVER APPEAL FROM THE CRAWFORD APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT