Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1145 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. LUIS MIGUEL SIERRA-AYALA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Pedro A. Delgado-Hernández, U.S. District Judge]

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Hector Garcia pled guilty to multiple counts of distributing, and conspiring to distribute, cocaine. He was thereupon sentenced. In this appeal, Garcia contests his sentence on two grounds, both related to the district court’s calculation of the guideline sentencing range (GSR), viz., (1) the court’s inclusion of certain quantities of coca

ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered five motions in the above-captioned case, including Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23; Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24; Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Evidence, ECF No. 28; Plaintiffs Motion for an Oral Hearing, ECF No. 34; and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Evidence, ECF No. 37. For the reaso

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

754 F.Supp. 1401 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gilberto REDONDO-LEMOS, Defendant. No. CR 89-208 TUC ACM. United States District Court, D. Arizona, Tucson Division. December 21, 1990. *1402 Jan Kearney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff. Fernando Gaxiola, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant. </

*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre

OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. The twenty-seven named plaintiff families in the case at bar, all residents of three public housing complexes located in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 against Defendants asserting violations of their rights under the United States Constitution. Specifically, Plaintiffs a

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

*221Opinión disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García h-í Desde los albores de este siglo reconocimos que las ca-lles, aceras y plazas "han sido destinadas al uso de los ha-bitantes de la ciudad, y todos y cada uno de ellos desde el Gobernador, en su palacio, hasta el limosnero en su choza, tienen derecho al uso [pacífico] libre

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: Aprobación del Libro de Instrucciones al Jurado; Agradecimiento al Comité 2022 TSPR 33 para la Revisión del Manual de Instrucciones al Jurado; designación 208 DPR _____ de miembros del Comité Asesor Permanente de Instrucciones al Jurado Número del Caso: EC-2022-01 Fecha: 25 de marzo de 2022 Materia: Resolución del Tribunal. Este documento constituye un documento oficial del Tribunal Supremo q

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under