Cases

*293Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lamont Henderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Henderson’s civil complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.

*293Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lamont Henderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Henderson’s civil complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 84(3). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s May 23, 2017 order be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellan

OPINION ESPINOSA, Judge: ¶ 1 Scott Henderson challenges the trial court’s judgment and various rulings related to the registration and enforcement of a foreign support order. For the reasons that follow, we accept special action jurisdiction in part but deny relief, and affirm the trial court’s determinations in full. Factual and Procedural Background ¶2 We view the

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s August 18, 2016 order be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for relie

Malone, J.: Michael E. Henderson appeals the district court's decision revoking his probation and ordering him to serve his underlying prison sentence. But this appeal is not about the probation revocation order. For the first time on appeal, Henderson claims his original sentence imposed on January 7, 2015, is illegal because the district court erred in classifying his 2005 Mississippi conviction of burglary of a dwelling as a per

Per Curiam. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Hunstein, Justice. *231**733Appellant Frank Henderson was convicted of felony murder and related offenses in connection with the beating death of Monica Davis.1 On appeal, Appellant contends that this Court should grant him a n

Papik, J. Tillman T. Henderson was convicted of first degree murder, attempted first degree murder, and related firearms offenses. We affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. See State v. Henderson, 289 Neb. 271 ,

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED . Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

HADLOCK, P. J. *666Defendant broke into his former girlfriend's home and damaged her property. He was charged with first-degree burglary constituting domestic violence (Count 1), second-degree criminal mischief (Count 2), third-degree theft (Count 3), and witness tampering (Count 4). The state charged the burglary count on a theory that defenda

Boggs, Justice. In Sylvester Henderson's pro se appeal from the trial court's order denying his "Objection to Order Denying Defendants Motion for Disclosure Grand Jury Testimony and Evidence," we address the scope of this Court's appellate jurisdiction in light of the changes imposed by OCGA § 15-3-3.1 on appeals filed after January 1, 2017. We conclude that we have subject matter jurisdiction because this appeal falls within Ga. Co

Per Curiam: Charles Henderson appeals, following a bench trial, his conviction of the class A misdemeanor of violating an order of protection under § 455.085.8, RSMo, Supp. 2014, for which he was sentenced to one year in the county jail with credit for time served. Finding no error, plain or otherwise, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge *367PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiff Nicole L. Henderson ("plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405

Duarte, J. *469Defendant Marlowe William Henderson, Jr., pleaded no contest to charges of stalking, vandalism, and disobeying a court order. At issue here is the validity of the trial court's resulting restitution order, which encompassed the victims' expenses for purchase and installation of a home security system. BACK

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. The petition seeking a belated appeal of the order denying motion for postconviction relief rendered on March 18, 2016, in Columbia County Circuit Court case number 2014-560-CF is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as' a notice of appeal. WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.

ORDER Paul S. Henderson, an Ohio prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case has been referred to a panel of the court that, upon examination, unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a). In 2009, Henderson pleaded guilty to drug trafficking. He was sentenced o

ORDER PER CURIAM Jeremy Henderson (“Defendant”) appeals from judgment upon his conviction after a jury trial on one count of arson in the first degree (in violation of Section 565.040, RSMo 2000) and murder in the second degree (Section 565.021). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit

PER CURIAM. The defendant appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant’s motion alleged that his sentence is illegal because the court erroneously imposed consecutive mandatory minimum terms for counts which he claimed arose from a single criminal episode. Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322-23 (Fla.1996); Parks