Cases

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

J-S15004-26 2026 PA Super 162 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : AARON MAURICE HOLBROOK : :

Justice Thomas, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I agree with the Court that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the right to keep and bear arms set forth in the Second Amendment “fully applicable to the States.” Ante, at 750. I write separately because I believe there is a more straightforward path to this conclusion, one that is more *806</

319 F.Supp.2d 756 (2004) Dellita JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT and City of Detroit Housing Commission, Defendants. No. 03-CV-74440-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 24, 2004. *757 *758 Lawrence J. Buckfire, Southfield, MI, for Plaintiffs. J

806 F.Supp. 515 (1992) Harold and Evangeline HURT, et al., v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al. Civ. A. No. 91-4746. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 27, 1992. *516 *517 *518 Herbert Monheit, Maryann Monheit, Law Offices of Herbe

Argued November 29, 1932. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned President Judge of the Superior Court. *Page 590

54 F.Supp.2d 1289 (1999) Marlene ARISTIL, individually and as parent and natural guardian for John D. Wilson, Plaintiffs, v. The HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant. No. 99-22-CIV-T-17F. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 8, 1999. *1290

475 U.S. 767 (1986) PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, INC., ET AL. v. HEPPS ET AL. No. 84-1491. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 3, 1985 Decided April 21, 1986 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA *768 David H. Marion argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Samuel E.

487 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2007) The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc.; and Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Defendants. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Counterclaimants, v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University; T

814 A.2d 458 (2003) 2003 ME 2 CREDIT COUNSELING CENTERS, INC., d/b/a CCCS, v. CITY OF SOUTH PORTLAND, et al.[1] Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: January 9, 2002. Decided: January 10, 2003. *459 David A. Lourie, Esq. (orally), Cape Elizabeth, ME, for plaintiff. Mary Kahl, Esq. (ora

Sloane, J., On March 3, 1952, the Sheriff of Philadelphia County sold a lot numbered 4207-11 Main Street, Philadelphia, at a tax sale upon the city’s claim. The sale was made pursuant to a decree of this court under section 31 of the Municipal *399Claims Act of May 16, 1923, P. L. 207, 53 PS §2051, and having met the requirements of this section as to failure to obtain th

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0099p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ DARRYL GRAY, Personal Representative of Estate of X -

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. This § 1983 case arises from the suicide of plaintiffs decedent, Mark Gray, while in pre-trial custody. Plaintiff Estate has sued Police Officer Gross for failing to adequately monitor Mr. Gray in his cell and the City of Detroit for failing to train its officers to foresee and prevent jail suicides. We agree with the Dist

Argued April 28, 1932. This is a workmen's compensation case. The claimant was employed by F.A. Leonard to do carpenter work in connection with certain engine houses in the City of Wilkes-Barre. Leonard received the contract from Mr. Mundy, who was connected with the government of the city. The arrangement was verbal and no attempt was made to conform with the act of July 8, 1917, P.L. 1083, Section two. The act provides that before any contract is made by any municipality or any department t

139 Mich. App. 515 (1984) 362 N.W.2d 771 CITY OF SAGINAW v. LINDQUIST Docket No. 67479. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 30, 1984. Robert E. Helm, Assistant City Attorney, for the City of Saginaw. Borrello, Thomas & Jensen, P.C. (by Peter C. Jensen), for Nancy A. Lindquist. Frank J. Kelley,<

566 F.Supp. 736 (1983) Frederick KAHHAN v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE. No. 82-213. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 24, 1983. *737 Gary Green, Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Daniel J. Ryan, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant. MEMORANDUM SHAP

DISSENTING OPINION BY Judge SMITH-RIBNER. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision. Most importantly, I cannot agree with the reasoning stated in the majority’s opinion that “[although the private property owner who petitioned for the private road certainly gains from the opening of the road, the public gains because otherwise inaccessible swaths of land in Pennsylvania would remain fallow and unpr

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. The City of Monticello, Utah, and its Chief of Police, Kent Adair, appeal a judgment on a jury verdict for the plaintiff, Brett Palmer, a former Monticello police officer. Palmer brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming his due process rights were violated when he was terminated from employment as a Monticello police officer. A state law cl

629 F.Supp. 1002 (1986) MONUMENT BUILDERS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 84-2469-S. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 26, 1986. *1003 Ray Fechtel, Eugene, Or., Edward A. McConwell, Law Offices of Edward A. McConwell, Overland Park, Kan., f

343 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2004) Terry BELL, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Defendant. No. CIV.A.03-2148-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 26, 2004. *1017 Alan V. Johnson, Stephen D. Lanterman, Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & Glassman, LLC, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff. M