⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “HOOD v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC”

District Court, N.D. California · 2016-08-18 · Published · cited 134× · 201 F. Supp. 3d 1110; 2016 WL 4398271
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL O’Connor, Docket No. 518 Yucesoy, Docket No. 206 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I- INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs brought the instant class action and putative class action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Uber miselassifies drivers as inde
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, §
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 254 F. Supp. 3d 1376
*1377ORDER DENYING TRANSFER Sarah S. Vance, Chair Before the Panel: * Plaintiff in one action in the Southern District of Florida (Rojas) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Florida. This litigation currently consists of three actions pending in three districts, a
State v. Bensonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-08-14 · Published · cited 12× · 2019 Ohio 3255
[Cite as State v. Benson, 2019-Ohio-3255.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-180128 TRIAL NO. B-1701853 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. BRIANA BENSON, : Defendant-Appella
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. WARRENS GELIN Docket: SJC-13433 Dates: December 4, 2023 - October 15, 2024 Present:
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 710
Baylson, J. I. Introduction Legal challenges by the taxicab industry to the advent of so-called Transportation Network Companies ("TNCs") such as Uber and Lyft are not new. This lawsuit, brought by taxi companies, does not seek to impose liability on TNCs themselves, but rather against the governmental agency responsible for regulating taxicabs in Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Parking Authority ("P
Com. v. Stark, M.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2026-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Pa. Super. 156
J-S44005-25 2026 PA Super 156 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MICHAEL ALLEN STARK : :
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-07-28 · Published · cited 5× · 326 F. Supp. 3d 1145
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1151THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum, filed October 16, 2017 (Doc. 67)("MSJ"); (ii) the Defendant's Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Strike Declaration of Joseph T. Gardemal III in Suppo
District Court, D. Utah · 1984-05-10 · Published · cited 35× · 588 F. Supp. 247; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16822
588 F.Supp. 247 (1984) Irene ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. C-79-0515J. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. May 10, 1984. *248 *249 *250 *251