Cases

ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the National Labor Relations Board’s (“Board”) motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 24(a)(b) of the Fed.R. of Civ.Proc. (Docket No. 25). The Board argues that it should be allowed to intervene in the instant case “because the Board has an interest relating to the property which is subject to this action and the Board is so situated that disposition

Levine, J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered March 10, 1992 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and (2) from an order of said court, entered *912September 30, 1992 in Albany County, which denied defendants’ motion for reconsideration. In late

FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Senior District Judge. This case presents issues concerning a final order of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) which concluded that Horizons Hotel Corporation d/b/a Carib Inn of San Juan (Horizons) engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of §§ 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3), (5

DECISION AND ORDER ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr.,* Bankruptcy Judge. Heard on March 27, 1990 on the Trustee’s Objection to the Priority Administrative Claim of Horizons Hotel Corporation (“Horizons”), filed on March 15, 1990. After hearing, counsel were requested to file legal memoranda addressing two issues: (1) whether Horizon’s claim is time barred, and (2) whether such claim consti

831 F.Supp. 10 (1993) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. HORIZONS HOTEL CORPORATION, d/b/a Carib Inn Hotel, Defendant. Civ. No. 90-1633(PG). United States District Court, Puerto Rico. September 29, 1993. *11 Delner Franklin-Thomas, E.E.O.C., New York City, for plaintiff. Luis F. Padilla, San Juan, PR, f

130 B.R. 6 (1991) In re CARIB-INN OF SAN JUAN CORP., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. B81-00273(ANV). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 1, 1991. *7 Charles A. Cuprill-Hernandez, Ponce, P.R., for trustee. Richard L. Koral, Fink, Weinberger, Fredman, Berman, Lowell & Fensterheim, P.C., New York City, Luis Padilla, Hato

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00525-CV New Horizons Ranch and Center, Inc., Appellant v. Brandon Grebe, Appellee FROM THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY NO. 19-03-7054, THE HONORABLE MIKE SMITH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT.

COHEN, J. Horizons A Far, LLC (“Horizons”), seeks interlocutory review of the trial court’s non-final order denying the appointment of a receiver entered in favor of Appellees. We reverse. In 2011, Horizons, a member of Plaza N 15, LLC (“Plaza”), filed a sworn complaint against Plaza’s managing member and subsidiary company. The complaint alleged causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and confli

"It has consistently been held that the immunity from civil liability under Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6) for a tort committed by the victim’s coemployee is limited to acts or omissions of the tortfeasor within the scope of his or her employment” (Cusano v Staff, 191 AD2d 918, 919; see also, Maines v Cronomer Val. Fire Dept. 50 NY2d 535). In this case, defendant Benjamin Fernandez, as president of Bronx Manor Hote

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 8

ORDER REGARDING APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT OF 2004 Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge The parties jointly ask the Court to approve the settlement of plaintiffs’ claims under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA” or “the Act”), see Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq. The Court has, to the extent possible, reviewed the p

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1294 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v.

458 B.R. 560 (2011) In re HOTELS NEVADA, LLC; Inns Nevada, LLC, Debtors. Nos. BK-S-09-31131-BAM, BK-S-09-31132-BAM. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada. September 14, 2011. *563 Brian Sirower, Catherine M. Guastello, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Marjorie A. Guymon, Goldsmith & Guymon, P.C., Las Vegas, NV, for Debtors.<

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the district court’s rendering of judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants, on plaintiffs’ claims of sexual discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under Mississippi sta

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen M. Coin, J.), entered August 11, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants Hotel Carlyle Owners Corporation, the Carlyle LLC, the Carlyle, a Rosewood Hotel, Alexandra E. Tscherne and Greg Dinella’s (defendants) motion *542 for summary judgment dismiss

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen M. Coin, J.), entered August 11, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claim for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment against defendant Hotel Carlyle Owners Corporation (Hotel) and his claims for trespass, conversion and punitive damages against all defendants, unanimousl

ORDER AND REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court are three Rule 12 Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiffs’ Class Action Allegations filed by the following defendants: (1) Choice Hotels International, Ine.’s (“Choice”) (R. Doe. 562); (2) Century Wilshire, Inc.’s (“CWI”)1 (R. Doc. 563); and (3) Allied World National Assurance Company, American

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60289 LORI HATLEY; HABAKKUK COOPER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HILTON HOTELS CORP.; BALLY’S OLYMPIA L.P., Defendants-Appellees. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

363 S.W.3d 551 (2011) David G. MILLS, Et Al. v. FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION d/b/a First Tennessee Home Loans, Et Al. No. W2010-00310-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 13, 2011. October 13, 2010 Session. November 16, 2010. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court