Cases

R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1362 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY; CHEMOURS COMPANY, f/k/a THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, LLC; CORTEVA, INC.; DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., D

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3M COMPANY, INC. et al., IN RE; ASBESToS LITIGATloN= ) ) LARRY CECIL STURGILL and ) JILL STURGILL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. NO. N15C-12-188 ASB ) v- ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: October 5, 2017 Decided: Decemberl 1, 2017 Upon Defendant Union Carbide Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED. ORDER David W. deBruin, Esquire, The deBruin Firm LLC, 1201 North Orange Street, Suite 500, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attorney for Plaintiffs, Larry

Howard v A.O. Smith Water Prods. (2023 NY Slip Op 00017) Howard v A.O. Smith Water Prods. 2023 NY Slip Op 00017 Decided on January 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

HORTON, J. The defendant, 3M National Advertising Company, Inc., appeals an eminent domain decision by the Superior Court (Conboy, J.), reducing the awards of the board of tax and land appeals (BTLA). The defendant argues that the trial court failed to award just compensation *362by: (1) not employing one of three generally recognized methods of appraisal valuati

MORENO, District Judge: This case requires the Court to analyze the plaintiffs burden of production in a § 1981 employment discrimination action 1 once the defendant moving for summary judgment offers evidence of a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for its decision not to enter into a contract with the plaintiff. The

SECTION: “G”(4) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Margaret Leech’s (“Leech”) “Motion to Remand to State Court.”1 Having considered the motion, the memoranda in support and in opposition, the record, and the applicable law, the Court will deny the motion. I. Background <

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiffs Robert Coene (“Coene”) and Valerie Coene have sued defendant 3M Company (“3M”) asserting a variety of state law claims sounding in products liability, breach of warranty, negligence and fraud arising out of Coene’s alleged occupational exposure to silica dust during

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BURCIAGA, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center [Sloan-Kettering] and Dr. Basil Hilaris [Hilaris] to dismiss and quash service of process for lack of personal jurisdiction and the motion of Defendant 3M Company to dismiss Plaintiff Dan Swallows’ Complaint in Joinder. Defendants Sloan-Kettering and

(2008) THERMODYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07 CV 2491. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. December 17, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are a number of motions. Plaintiff Thermodyn Corporati

[Cite as Jochum v. Howard Hanna Co., 2020-Ohio-6676.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO MICHAEL JOCHUM, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2020-L-077 - vs - :

134 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2001) Edward N. HUGHES and Dorothy K. Hughes, Plaintiffs, v. 3M RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company ("3M"), Defendants. No. Civ.99-2062(DSD/JMM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 19, 2001. *1063 Ronald I Meshbesher, Daniel John Boivin, Meshbesher & Spence,

To the. court of cvuiavmm- &ppem.^ of Text*^ OP'CMM Al Wou)cxfd \WeVi»3c» PeVi-V\ o ^i€_r COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS V. MAR 03 2015 The. ^sVak 5-F Te*Q5 ft«sp&i\de'rv\

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1603 CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Plaintiff, and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY; AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATIO

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: 14 September 2006 31 August 2007 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Saint-Gobain Corporation v. 3M Company1

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: The Chicago Local No. 458-3M, Graphic Communications International Union, AFL-CIO (“union”), appeals the National Labor Relations Board’s (“Board”) decision that White Cap, Inc. * (“company”), did not violate § 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”).

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF PANERA ) BREAD COMPANY ) C.A. No. 2017-0593-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 7, 2019 Date Decided: January 31, 2020 Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, and Melissa N. Donimirski, HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware