Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “HUDSON v. SMART”
Hudson v. Smartpublic domain
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AUG 18 2009 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts Cheryl D. Lott Hudson, )
Hudson v. Smartpublic domain
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUG 31 2009 Clerk, u.s. District and Bankrupt
Hudson v. Smartpublic domain
FILED AUG 18 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts Cheryl D. L
United States v. Smartpublic domain
ORDER Roy Smart was convicted of possessing a firearm as a felon, and was sentenced above the guidelines to a 96-month term. Smart now challenges that sentence as unreasonable. Because the district court sufficiently explained the 96-month sentence based on the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), we affirm. In March 2012 a woman reported to Chicago police that a man with a handgun in his waistband had grabbed and struc
ORDER URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. D.E. 60 and 62. THE COURT has considered the motions and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for determination. BACKGROUND
Hudson v. Statepublic domain
248 S.W.3d 56 (2008) Troy C. HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 67082. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 22, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied April 15, 2008. Laura G. Martin, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shuan
People v. Smartpublic domain
2022 IL App (2d) 210531 No. 2-21-0531 Opinion filed November 29, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE
Hudson v. Statepublic domain
ORDER Ronald Byrd Hudson appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion to set aside his guilty plea to one count of attempted robbery in the first degree. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Hudson v. Hudsonpublic domain
455 S.E.2d 14 (1995) Judith E. HUDSON, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Forrest Gatewood Hudson, deceased v. Carole A. HUDSON. Record No. 940601. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 3, 1995. *15 A. James Kauffman, Richmond (G. Wythe Michael, Jr., Taylor, Hazen & Kauffman, on briefs), for appellant. Eppa Hunto
Hudson v. Statepublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant Gregory A. Hudson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Hudson had been found guilty by a jury of one count of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, section 571.015, and sentenced to consecutive terms of life without parole and life. We affirm
Hudson v. Whitesidepublic domain
34 S.W.3d 420 (2000) Jeanette HUDSON, Respondent, v. John WHITESIDE, Appellant, and William G. Hudson, Defendant. No. WD 57718. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. December 19, 2000. *421 Clarence W. Hawk, Osage Beach, for appellant. Danieal H. Miller, Daniel R. Dunham, Co-Counsel, Columbia, for respondent.
Hudson v. Smartpublic domain
Journal Entries (1821-22): Journal 3: (1) Rule for special bail or pro-cedendo *p. 199; (2) continued *p. 260; (3) discontinued *p. 342. Papers in File: (i) Precipe for habeas corpus; (2) writ of habeas corpus and return; (3) copy of indorsement on county court capias; (4) recognizance and bail piece; (5) declaration; (6) plea of non assumpsit; (7) precipe for subpoena; (8) subpoena; (9) precipe for subpoena; (10) subpoena; (11
Sanchez v. Smart Fabricators of TXpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 11, 2021 No. 19-20506
City of Kansas City v. Hudsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Orlo K. Hudson was charged with assault and unlawful exhibition of a weapon in violation of the Kansas City, Missouri Code of General Ordinances, Chapter 50, § 26. The two counts were tried together before a jury on June 1, 1998. Hudson was acquitted on the assault charge and convicted on the charge involving the exhibition of the deadly weapon. Hudson was sentenced to seven days at the Municipal Correctional Ins
Razoumovitch v. 726 Hudson Ave.public domain
Filed 5/12/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ARKADI RAZOUMOVITCH, B316606 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 20STCV12915) 726 HUDSON AVE., LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a j
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. Hudsonpublic domain
158 S.W.3d 319 (2005) STATE of Missouri ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and Khaleb Lee Holder, by Karen Louise Salmon as next friend, and Karen Louise Salmon, Relator, v. The Honorable Stephen HUDSON, Associate Circuit Judge, Third Circuit of Grundy County, Respondent. No. WD 64345. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March
Hudson v. Quisc, Inc.public domain
205 Ga. App. 840 (1992) 424 S.E.2d 37 HUDSON et al. v. QUISC, INC. A92A1238. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 7, 1992. Reconsideration Denied October 16, 1992. Gannam & Gnann, M. Joseph Gannam, for appellants. Don Smart, Allison K. Luke, for appellee. JOHNSON, Judge. Alice M.
State v. Smartpublic domain
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JEREMY A. SMART. No. COA06-180 Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed February 6, 2007 This case not for publication Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Rebecca E. Lem, for the State. Daniel F. Read for Defendant-Appellant. STEPHENS, Judge. On 1 July 2004, Officer D.J. Hege, of the Wins
Hudson v. Babiloniapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER . Michael P, Shea, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Charles Hudson and Aleeshia Bailey Hudson assert claims under various consumér protection laws against Aisha Babilonia, SLM Corporation (now Navient Corporation (“Navient Corp.”)), Sallie Mae Bank, Sallie Mae, Inc. (now Navient Solutions, Inc. (“NSI”)), and PFS/Progressive Financial Services, Inc. (“Progressive”) arising from
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 8 Docket: PUC-22-8 Argued: November 3, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, and LAWRENCE, JJ. MAINE COALITION TO STOP SMART METERS v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al. STANFILL, C.J. [¶1] The Maine Coalition to S