Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “HUNLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES”
Siburt v. Secretary of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, District Judge. This is an action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (hereinafter Act) 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (hereinafter Secretary) denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to 216(i) and 223 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423. The case is presen
Stephen Elliot Powers v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-DR-00696-SCT STEPHEN ELLIOT POWERS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD W. McKENZIE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION
Estate of Powell v. United Statespublic domain
271 F.Supp.2d 880 (2001) ESTATE OF Beverly W. POWELL, John E. Lane, III, Executor, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 6:00CV0004. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. July 30, 2001. Joel Bron Miller, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, John E. Lane, III, Pro Se, Lynch Station, VA, for plaintiff/counter-defendant.
Planned Parenthood of South Carolina, Inc. v. Rosepublic domain
236 F.Supp.2d 564 (2002) PLANNED PARENTHOOD, et al., Plaintiffs v. Boykin ROSE, et al. Defendants No. 2-01-3571-23. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. December 26, 2002. Michael P. O'Connell, Stirling O'Connell and Pennington, Charleston, SC, Peter L. Murphy, Columbia, SC, Roger Evans, Carrie Y. Flaxman, New York, NY, for Plaintiff
Markweise v. Peck Foods Corp.public domain
205 Wis.2d 208 (1996) 556 N.W.2d 326 (93-CV-006741) Daniel MARKWEISE, Bonnie Markweise, individually and as Guardian for Steven Douglas Raymond Pallo and Wayne Murphy, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[] v. PECK FOODS CORPORATION and Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance, Defendants, CITY OF MILWAUKEE and City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works, Defendants-Appellants. (93-CV-012419) Darin GAINES, Willia
Thomas v. Harrispublic domain
ORDER MELTON, District Judge. Dorothy Thomas, pursuant to Title II, Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), filed this cause of action requesting review of the denial by the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, (now the Department of Health and Human Services) of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. The plaintiff contends that she is entitled to bene
Bryant v. Harrispublic domain
494 F.Supp. 932 (1980) Susie S. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. Patricia Roberts HARRIS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79-1168. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division. August 4, 1980. *933 Ernest J. Howard, Griffin & Howard, Greenville, S. C., for plaintiff. James D.
Smith v. Schweikerpublic domain
520 F.Supp. 27 (1981) Charles P. SMITH v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services. No. 81-160-L. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. June 3, 1981. *28 *29 Jeffry A. Schapira, Manchester, N. H., for plaintiff. Helen J. Forsyth, Asst. U. S. Atty., Concord,
Safford v. PaineWebber, Inc.public domain
730 F.Supp. 15 (1990) Charles SAFFORD, et al. v. PAINEWEBBER, INC. Civ. A. No. 89-4925. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 8, 1990. *16 James E. Stovall, Jackson & Stovall, New Orleans, La., and Lionel F. Price, Slidell, La., for plaintiffs. Lloyd Eades Hogue, Thomas Michael Keiffer and Kenneth Anth
62 F.Supp.2d 1 (1999) OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ("OCAW") AFLCIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federico PENA, Secretary of Energy and the United States Department of Energy, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-1926(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 29, 1999. Daniel Guttman, Reuben A. Guttman, Brian P. McCafferty
Vialez v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
783 F.Supp. 109 (1991) Ana VIALEZ, Plaintiff, v. The NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Emanuel Popolizio, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 8356 (DNE) (SEG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 18, 1991. *110 Bronx Legal Services (Jill Siegel,
United States v. Frostpublic domain
OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. These five criminal defendants raise numerous issues attacking their convictions and sentences for committing mail fraud against the federal government and the University of Tennessee. One defendant also appeals his conviction for knowingly making a false material declaration before a grand jury. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for p
United States v. Frostpublic domain
125 F.3d 346 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Walter FROST (95-6011; 96-5722); Robert Eugene Turner(95-6005; 96-5725); Richard Thomas Congo (95-6004); PeggyYoung Potter (95-6012; 96-5726); Dennis Allen Faulkner(95-6006; 96-5785), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 95-6004, 95-6005, 95-6006, 95-6011, 95-6012, 96-5722,96-5725, 96-5726 and 96-5785. United States