Cases

898 S.W.2d 161 (1994) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Olen "Eddie" HUTCHISON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. June 6, 1994. Rehearing Denied May 1, 1995. *164 Charles Burson, Atty. Gen. and Reporter, Rebecca L. Gundt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. John Eldridge, Knoxville, Charlie Allen, Oneida, for

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 771–815 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 1, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

MEMORANDUM OPINION Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge “In all literature, there is perhaps no more vivid example of a man wrestling with the knowledge of his own guilt than that of Raskolnikov in [Fyodor] Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment.”1 “Throughout Crime and Punishment, Dostoyevsky provides examples of physical actions and

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Lead Plaintiff Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund (“Lead Plaintiff’), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a complaint (“Consolidated Complaint,” Dkt. No. 66) against sixteen defendants: Inovalon Holdings, Inc. (“Ino-valon”); six of Inovalon’s officers and directors, Keith R. Dunleavy, Thomas R. Kloster, Denise K.

BARATIA, J., ORDER OF COURT And now, this day of October, 2013, upon consideration of defendants, First Student, Inc. and David R Quier, Jr. as administrator of the estate of Kelly A. Quier, deceased’s, preliminary objections to the amended complaint, it is hereby ordered the defendants’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer with regard to allegations of punitive damages are sustained in p

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. MeVERRY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) (Document No. 18) with Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Document No. 19); Plaintiff

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: In the wake of the Great Depression, Congress took measures to protect the U.S. economy from suffering another catastrophic collapse. Congress’s first step in that endeavor was the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act” or “Act”), ch. 38, 48 Stat. 74 (codified as amended at 15 U.S

OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J. Appellant, Randall Weston, challenges an August 12, 2011 entry of judgment in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County.1 This matter stems from a Complaint filed by Weston and James Strecansky against Appellees James Kusko and Northampton Personal Care, Inc. (“Northampton, Inc.”).2 The Complaint alleged that Weston and Str

OPINION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 52(a)(1) IRENAS, Senior District Judge. This case involves claims by Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc. (“Vibra-Tech”) that Defendants Scott and Roberta Kavalek (collectively “the Kavalek Defendants”) breached employment agreements, violated the duty of loyalty, converted VibraTech’s property, and engaged in a civil conspiracy in order to benefit their own competing corporation

*477 OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. This case arises from a now-defunct Ponzi scheme. The defendants are MB Investment Partners, Inc. (“MB”), a registered investment adviser, and various persons affiliated with MB. The fraudulent scheme was perpetrated by Mark Bloom while

474 F.Supp.2d 737 (2007) Marguerite J. SOUFFLAS, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-4753. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 21, 2007. *738 *739 *740 John P. Kopesky, Sheller Ludwig & Badey, Philadelphia, P

OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: This is one of seventeen actions brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA” or “the Agency”), as conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) (collectively, the “Government Sponsored Enterprises” or “GSEs”),

HERRON, J., Plaintiffs Textile Biocides and Saniclean signed agreements to buy and sell the defendant Avecia’s antimicrobial product Reputex.1 The deal went poorly for both sides. The plaintiffs sued Avecia for fraud, breach of contract, tortious interference and negligent misrepresentation. Avecia filed coun*246terclaims for fraud and breach o

337 S.W.3d 325 (2011) Linda FAUST and Donnie Faust, Appellants, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 02-08-00226-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. January 27, 2011. Rehearing Overruled March 10, 2011. *327 Jared R. Woodfill, H. Paul Pressler III, Woodfill & Pressler, LLP, L. Todd Kelly, Heidi O. Vi

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. DH Technology, Inc. (“DHT”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California holding, on summary judgment in DHT’s suit for patent infringement against Synergystex International, Inc. (“Synergys-tex”), that U.S. Patent No. 5,115,493 (“the ’493 patent”) is unenforceable because DHT incorrectly paid the

64 F.3d 860 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,703 Leatch BOOKER, III,v.TAYLOR MILK COMPANY, INC.; Russell Morgan; Timothy M.Garcia; Diane Petcash; Joseph S. Taylor; PhilF. Richardson; Dick Richardson;Richardson & Associates.Leatch Booker, III, Appellant in No. 94-3503 andCross-appellee in No. 94-3525.Taylor Milk Company, Inc., Appellant in No. 94-3525 andCross-appellee in No. 94-3503

653 F.Supp. 984 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. SOUTH CAROLINA RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL, INC.; Columbia Organic Chemical Company; Oscar Seidenberg; Harvey Hutchinson; Monsanto Company; Allied Corporation; Aquair Corporation; Eaton Corporation; and EM Industries, Inc., Defendants, v. G.D. SEARLE & CO., and Will Ross, Inc., Thir

424 F.Supp. 891 (1976) Emra Joseph BONHAM, Plaintiff, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 76-1067. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. December 28, 1976. *892 Robert R. Stone, James R. Duffy, Fine, Perlow & Stone, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Donald E. Seymour, Kirkpatric

93 F.3d 1158 65 USLW 2169 12TH STREET GYM, INC., Robert Guzzardi, Appellants at No. 95-1864,v.GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant at No. 96-1845. Nos. 95-1845, 95-1846. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Submitted Pursuant to Third CircuitLAR 34.1(a) May 2, 1996. Decided Aug. 28, 1996.

J-A18034-23 2023 PA Super 230 BRENDA HUTCHINSON AND : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGLAS HUTCHINSON : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : v. : : THIERRY C. VERSTRAETEN, M.D.; E. : RONALD SALVITTI, M.D., INC., : INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A : SOUTHWESTER