Cases

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Hershel Stanley, an inmate in Wisconsin’s prison system, wants to participate in a program for sex offenders, believing that successful completion will give him a boost when seeking parole or work release and reduce the chance that he will be civilly committed at the end of his criminal sentence. See Wis. Stat. §§ 980.01 to 980.13. Stanley contends that

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–1766 Submitted December 18, 2024—Filed June 27, 2025 Eugene Sikora, Appellant, vs. State of Iowa and Beth Skinner, in her official capacity as Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections, Appellees. Appe

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge.’ I. INTRODUCTION We are asked to decide whether the Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to compensate employees for breaks of 20 minutes or less during which they are logged off of their computers and free of any work re

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 24-2842 _____________ SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC; MAYBROOK-C KADE OPCO, LLC; MAYBROOK-C EVERGREEN OPCO, LLC; MAYBROOK-C WHITECLIFF OPCO, LLC; MAYBROOK-C LATROBE OPCO, LLC; MAYBROOK-C OVERL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAKARAIEL IKHANA TAHUTI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-2003 (RDM) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Dakaraiel Ikhana Tahuti, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the United Sta

7 F.Supp.2d 1234 (1998) Martha SANDOVAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. L.N. HAGAN, in his official capacity as the Director of the Alabama Department of Public Safety, and the Alabama Department of Public Safety, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-D-1875-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 3, 1998. As Corre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVE PAPPAS, et al., : Individually and on behalf of all others : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 19-2800 (RC) : v.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA YEHOWSHUA YISRAEL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2740 JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee. __________________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HERMAN WILLIAMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-1214 JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Responde

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ No. 15-9005 ______ JOHN C. LESKO, Appellant v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI; SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI; DISTRICT

MEMORANDUM Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (“Commonwealth”) appeals the decision of the United States Department of Health and Human Services Departmental Appeals Board (“Appeals Board”) concerning a Medicaid reimbursement dispute. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), a division of the United States Department of Health

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA LUCIUS B. SMITH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-3182 JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Responde

583 N.E.2d 494 (1991) 145 Ill.2d 287 164 Ill.Dec. 578 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Michael F. HAGAN, Appellant. No. 70779. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 21, 1991. *495 Michael F. Hagan, Buffalo Grove, appellant pro se. Roland W. Burris, Atty. Gen.,

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us for a second time following a remand to this court by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. O’Hagan, — U.S. -, -, 117 S.Ct. 2199, 2220, 138 L.Ed.2d 724 (1997). In our prior opinion, United States v. O’Hagan, 92 F.3d 612 (8th Cir.1996), we reversed defendant James Herman O’Hagan’s c

*1353 CARNES, Circuit Judge: Keith Lamont Jordan is serving sentences of life imprisonment and twenty-two years following his conviction in Florida state court for first degree murder, attempted first degree murder, and armed robbery. After the First District Court of Appeal affirmed his conviction,

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA COOK INLET FISHERMAN’S ) FUND, ) Supreme Court No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robson Xavier Gomes v. Civil No. 20-cv-453-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 081 US Department of Homeland Security, Acting Secretary et. al. O R D E R Approximately 75 detainees being held in jail in Dover, New Hampshire bring this class action seeking emergency relief due to the risk o

901 F.Supp. 1461 (1995) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. James H. O'HAGAN, Defendant. Civ. No. 3-90-16. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. August 8, 1995. *1462 Robert Michael Small, U.S. Atty. Office, Minneapolis, MN, Ellen B. Cohn, Thomas Vincent Sjoblom, Securities & Exchange Commi

OPINION ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge. Plaintiff, a member of the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees (“BRAC”), Lodge 705 and System Board 86, instituted this action pursuant to Section 501 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 501.1 BRAC is an unincorporated association and

OPINION NETTESHEIM, Judge. This case is before the court on petitioners’ motion for review of a special master’s dismissal of their petition for compensation brought under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l—300aa-34 (1988), as amended by several public laws codified in 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300aa-l—300aa-34 (West Supp.1991) (“the Act”). The issue for decision is whet