Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALLEN L. TREICHLER, No. 12-35944 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01333-SI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the undersigned for disposition based upon the parties' full consent. Doc. 7. At issue is whether the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in finding Plaintiff not "disabled" and therefore unentitled to Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") and/or Supplemental Security Income ("SSI").1 This case

Case: 18-14771 Date Filed: 07/28/2020 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14771 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cv-00743-DN

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. This matter is presently before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge Michael Hluehaniuk has submitted a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in which he recommends that the court deny plaintiffs motion and grant defendant’s motion. Plaintiff has file

ORDER Ellaree Blanton, who is represented by counsel, appeals a district court judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have waived oral argument and the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Blanton filed her application for supplemental security income benefits o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Megan Elizabeth McDonald v. Civil No. 22-cv-86-JL Opinion No. 2022 DNH 153 Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER ON APPEAL Megan McDonald appeals the Social Security Administration's

OLIVER, District Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Lusk appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the denial of his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Lusk filed his DIB application on March 81,1998, and his SSI application on April 8, 1998, alleging that he became unable to work on March 19, 1998. Lusk initially claimed that his inability to work was due

ORDER Carrie E. Hensley, on behalf of her minor daughter, Tiffany Hensley, appeals a district court judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income benefits. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. Appellant’s opening brief cites Rice v. Chater, No. 95-35604, 1996 WL 583605 (9th Cir. Oct.9, 1996). Rice is an unpub *1159 lished disposition, not reported in the Federal Reporter except as a one-line entry in a long table of cases

Joyce M. Berry appeals a district court judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for social security disability insurance benefits. The parties have waived oral argument and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Berry filed an application for social security disability insurance benefits alleging that she suffered from back pain. Following a hearing, the administrati

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Richard Roby, appeals the denial of Social Security disability insurance benefits. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423(d). Plaintiff argues that the decision of the *534administrative law judge (ALJ) is not supported by substantial evidence. He also challenges the constitutionality of 20 C.F.R. § 404.1513(e) on due process and equal protection grounds.

83 F.3d 431 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. The

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Elam v. Comm’r of Social Security No. 03-5315 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0378P (6th Cir.) File Name: 03a0378p.06 ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Phyllis Elam, on behalf of her minor daughter Kamea Golay, appeals a district court judgment affirming the Commission *125 er’s termination of supplemental security income benefits. The parties have waived oral argument and this p

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING ) HALE AND DORR LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 25-917 (RJL) V. ) ) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE ) PRESIDENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________ _)

ACCEPTED 13-15-00174-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/22/2015 8:09:32 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEDINATURA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-2066 (RDM) FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case concerns the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) regulation of homeopathic drugs. For m

19 F.Supp.2d 1022 (1998) Davy L. HALE and Barbara D. Hale, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 97-3263-CV-S-BC. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southern Division. September 14, 1998. *1023 Karenanne Miller, Springfield, MO, for Plaintiffs. Judith M. Strong, U.S. Att

PER CURIAM: Josephine Foote appeals from a district court order granting judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) who denied Foote’s application for disability benefits under the Supplemental Security Income Program of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq. On appeal, Foote maintains that