Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ralph Jaffe appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jaffe v. O’Malley, No. 1:09-cv-02120-BEL (D.Md. Sept

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for t

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ralph Jaffe appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jaffe v. O’Malley, No. 1:09-cv-02120-BEL (D.Md. Sept

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for t

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 82 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 83 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERESA D., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-02864 (GMH) FRANK BISIGNANO, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Teresa D. brought this action seek

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1196 KELLY J. CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United Stat

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3084 ERIK D. BERTAUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Di

[Cite as State ex rel. Brockler v. O'Malley, 2020-Ohio-4985.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ) STATE EX REL. AARON JAMES C.A. No. CA-19-108471 BROCKLER, ESQ. Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as C.H. v. O’Malley, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4382.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical o

[Cite as O'Malley v. Laborers' Internatl. Union of N. Am. Local 860, 2024-Ohio-3103.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA HON. THOMAS F. O’MALLEY : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, : Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- : Appellant,

15 Kan. App. 2d 709 (1991) 817 P.2d 660 HILL COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. JOHN O'MALLEY, d/b/a O'MALLEY PLUMBING, Appellee. No. 65,663 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed April 26, 1991. Robert E. Keeshan, of Hamilton, Peterson, Tipton & Keeshan, of Topeka, for the appellant. Troy V. Huser and Robert L. Pottr

804 F.Supp.2d 427 (2011) Edward C. McREADY, Plaintiff, v. Honorable Martin O'MALLEY, et al., Defendants. Case No. RWT 08cv2347. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 31, 2011. *432 Edward C. McReady, Chevy Chase, MD, pro se. Thomas Faulk, State of Maryland Office of the Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Defen

[Cite as Fehrenbach v. O'Malley, 2011-Ohio-5481.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TARA N. FEHRENBACH, : APPEAL NO. C-100730 TRIAL NO. A-9701756 GINA D. FEHRENBACH, : O P I N I O N. and

Per Curiam. *548 {¶ 1} In this original action, relator, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney Michael C. O'Malley, seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael J. Russo, from exercising jurisdiction over a wron

Per Curiam. *1084 *553 {¶ 1} In this original action, relator, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney Michael C. O'Malley, seeks writs of prohibition and mandamus to prev

128 P.3d 151 (2006) Vicki MARSINGILL, Appellant, v. James O'MALLEY, M.D., Appellee. No. S-11578. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 27, 2006. *153 Robert H. Wagstaff, Law Offices of Robert H. Wagstaff, Anchorage, and Richard H. Friedman, Friedman Rubin & White, Anchorage, for Appellant. Howard A. Lazar and Donna M. Meyer

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (“Hamilton Beach”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting in part Sunbeam Products, Inc.’s (“Sunbeam”) motion for summary judgment finding claims 1 and 3-7 (“

The opinion of the court was delivered by Larson, J.: This appeal raises the question of whether a conditional payment can be made on a promissory note barred by the statue of limitations and revive the obligation to pay the principal amount but not the interest thereon. When the makers delivered a partial payment on the principal of a time-barred promissory note, they indicated an intent

MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge James Hamilton (“Plaintiff”) brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against William L. Pallozzi in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Maryland State Police (“MSP”), and against Brian E. Frosh in his official capacity as Attorney General of Maryland (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of certain Mary