Cases

632 S.E.2d 467 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 689 MITSUI MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. HANJIN SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD. et al. Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Mitsui Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd. Nos. A06A0051, A06A0185. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 9, 2006. *468 Bouhan, W

(2008) VOYAGER SHIPHOLDING CORP., Plaintiff, v. HANJIN SHIPPING CO., LTD., Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 11123(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 13, 2008. OPINION and ORDER GERARD E. LYNCH, District Judge. In this maritime action, plaintiff Voyager Shipholding Corporation ("Voyager") obtained an order of attachment pursuant

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. On August 15,1997, defendant Hanjin filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment; supporting memorandum and points of authorities; supporting declaration of Mark W. Nelson, with exhibit; and supporting declaration of Beth Ann Savre, with exhibits. On September 3, 1997, plaintiff filed its opposition to the motion for sum

229 F.Supp.2d 977 (2002) BIGGE EQUIPMENT CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAXPEED INT'L TRANSPORT CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. No. C 01-3011 MJJ. No. C 01-1071 MJJ. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 6, 2002. Mitchell S. Griffin, Cox Wootton Griffin Hansen & Poulos, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.

770 F.Supp. 832 (1991) MONSANTO INTERNATIONAL SALES CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HANJIN CONTAINER LINES, LTD., Defendant. HANJIN CONTAINER LINES, LTD., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. M/V K.H. ENTERPRISE and/or ORIENTAL FAITH, their engines, boilers, etc., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. 88 Civ. 1673 (KMW). United States District Court, S.D. of New York.

MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, JUDGE. Congress requires liability for negligence allegedly causing injuries to a longshoreman during stevedoring operations be governed by a federal workers’ compensation act known as the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (“Act”). We often must sort out liability when the injured workman sues several parties with some contact with the Vessel. Defendants seeking an early dismissa

307 F.Supp.2d 621 (2003) CHISSO AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. M/V HANJIN OSAKA, her engines, boilers, etc., in rem, Laysan and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendants. No. 2:01-CV-1867(AMW)(SDW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 10, 2003. *622 Charles A. Johnson, Hill Rivkins & Hayden, LLP, Hoboken, NJ, for Pla

756 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2010) Allen LORETZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. REGAL STONE, LTD., Hanjin Shipping, Co., Ltd., Synergy Maritime, Ltd., Fleet Management Ltd., and John Cota, In Personam, M/V Cosco Busan, their engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, freights, and cargo, In Rem, Defendants. Case No. 07-5800 SC. United States District Court, N.D. Cali

347 F.Supp.2d 749 (2004) AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY; AIU Company, Plaintiffs, v. TGL CONTAINER LINES, LTD.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd.; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd.; M/V Hanjin Pennsylvania, Defendants. TGL Container Lines, Ltd.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. The Hanjin Pennsylvania; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd., Third-Party Defendants. No. C 03-5190MHP.

OPINION & ORDER JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge: Before the Court is a motion by Garnishee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), for the release of funds presently restrained under Rule B of the Supplemental Rules of Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (“Rule B”). For the reasons that follow, the Rule B attachment is vacated but the order of vacatur is stayed pending additional discovery.

162 F.3d 571 1999 A.M.C. 650, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9129,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,762 AKIYAMA CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a corporation; VigilantInsurance Company, a corporation and a member ofthe Chubb Group of Insurance Companies,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.M.V. HANJIN MARSEILLES, her engines, tackle, machinery,etc.; Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd., a corporation; TotalTerminals, Inc., a corpor

FITZGERALD, District Judge: The Carriage of Goods by the Sea Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 1300, et seq. (COGSA), governs the liabilities of parties to a bill of lading for the carriage of goods by the sea. COG-SA strictly limits a carrier’s liability, and provides: “Neither the carrier nor the ship shall in any event be or become liable for any loss or damage to or in connection with the transportation of goods in an amount

206 F.Supp.2d 927 (2002) INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, as subrogee of Lowe's Companies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. HANJIN SHIPPING COMPANY; Fritz Companies, Inc.; O'Hare Services; and Channel Distribution, Defendants. No. 00 C 5226. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 14, 2002. *928

7 F.3d 1427 1994 A.M.C. 365 ALL PACIFIC TRADING, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff,andTokio Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.; Fireman's FundInsurance Co.; International Cargo & Surety InsuranceCompany; Malayan Overseas Insurance Corporation; Shin KongFire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.; Compass International,Janka, Ltd.; Rockwell International Corp.; USA Maxam,Inc.; A.O.K. Internat

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge: MTV Hanjin Yosu (formerly the Korea Wonis One), a vessel under Korean flag, and its owner, the Hanjin Container Line, Inc. (formerly the Korea Shipping Corp. and hereinafter referred to as Hanjin, Inc.), seek to appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of numerous Plaintiffs in an admiralty action.1 The Plaintiffs are the owners of goods, or their subrogated

(2008) GLORY WEALTH SHIPPING SERVICE LTD., Plaintiff, v. FIVE OCEAN CORPORATION LTD., Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 1102(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 4, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. On February 5, 2008, plaintiff Glory Wealth Shipping Service Ltd. ("Glory Wealth") applied ex parte for an

890 F.Supp. 308 (1995) In the Matter of the Complaint of AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., as Owner of M/V President Washington, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability, In re the Complaint of HANJIN SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., as Bareboat Charterer, and Highlight Navigation Corporation, as the sole owner of the vessel Hanjin Hong Kong, Lloyd's and IMO No. 8502896, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. Nos. 94 Civ.

ORDER EDENFIELD, Chief Judge. At the pretrial conference the parties asked the Court to decide whether this case should be tried by a jury. The third party plaintiff, relying on the demand made by the plaintiff in the original claim, seeks a jury trial. The third party defendant disputes the applicability of the original plaintiff’s jury demand to the third party claim. In the original

131 F.Supp.2d 787 (2000) ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Plaintiff, v. CHO YANG SHIPPING CO., LTD., and Cho Yang (America), Inc., and D.S.R. America, her engines, machinery tackle, furnishings, apparel, etc.,in rem, Defendants. No. 2:00CV400. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. September 15, 2000. *788

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: U.G. Co., Inc. (U.G.) and Kamdar Global LLC (Kamdar) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of APL Co. Pte. Ltd. (APL), based on the district court’s holding that U.G. and Kamdar have indemnification obligations to APL under the parties’ bill of lading. APL appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees