Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-902 Filed 4 June 2025 Onslow County, Nos. 18CRS051275-660, 18CRS051276-660, 22CRS000487-660 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JONATHAN JERMANE HANNAH, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 16 March 2023 by Judge Thomas H. Lock in Onslow County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 20 March 2024. Attorney

799 F.Supp.2d 355 (2011) Abdus Salaam MALIK, Plaintiff, v. Lewis HANNAH, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-3901 (JBS/JS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 28, 2011. *356 Abdus Salaam Malik, White Deer, PA, pro se. Mark Cieslewicz, Esq., Office of the City Attorney, City Hall, Camden, NJ, for Defendant City

FILED Mar 28, 2022 10:31 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Wilbert Hannah (A-74/75-19) (084052) January 4, 2021 -- Reargued March 31, 2021 -- Decided August 18, 2021 ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-IA-00034-SCT UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER v. VINCENT KELLY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/21/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WINSTON L. KIDD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: PHILIP W. GAINES STEPHEN P. KRUGER T.L. “SMITH” BOYKIN, III

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 16, 2013 Session HANNAH ANN CULBERTSON v. RANDALL ERIC CULBERTSON An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-005484 James F. Russell, Judge No. W2012-01909-COA-R10-CV - Filed April 30, 2014 This is the second extraordinary interlocutory appeal in this divorce case and custody d

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 119 CA 12-01326 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. MARIA L. JAOUDE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER MATTHEW E. HANNAH, L.P. PARNASSOS AND RITA J. BIONDO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) LAWRENCE A. SCHULZ, ORCHARD PARK, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (A. VI

CIKLIN, J. The appellant, Eddie Rutledge, timely appeals his convictions and sentences for first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder.. Within a reasonable period of time of becoming aware of it, Rutledge’s court appointed attorney, Carey Haughwout, put the trial court on notice that she suspected the State Attorney’s Office was investigating her for witness tampering.

—Peters, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County (Main, Jr., J.), entered September 18, 2001, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate Hannah UU. a neglected child. Respondent is the mother of two children, Nathaniel (born in 1997) and Hannah (born in 2001). On June 21, 2000, petitioner commenced a proceeding pursuant t

SKOGLUND, J. ¶ 1. After a bench trial, the trial court concluded that defendant-attorney's failure to adequately inform plaintiff Hannah Sachs of the risks of delay in filing a parentage action "negligently fell short of the standard of reasonably competent legal representation." Despite the court's conclusion that defendant breached her professional duty of care, the trial court determ

In a child abuse proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated February 7, 2000, which, after a hearing, found that he had sexually abused his daughter, (2) so much of an order of disposition of the same court, also dated February 7, 2000, as placed his daughter in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services, and (3) an order of the same cour

59 Cal.Rptr.3d 321 (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1247 In re VINCENT M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Santa Cruz Human Resources Agency, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paz M., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. H030258. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. May 17, 2007. *322 Dana M

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James F. Martin, III and Renee Martin: : v. : : Zoning Hearing Board of West Vincent : Township : : v. : : Marc Duey and Maureen Duey, : No. 686 C.D. 2019 Appell

15 F.3d 1093NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Vincent MEO Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10197. United States Court of A

The parties to this action were married November 17, 1913. Appellee is 35 years of age, and is employed as a brakeman by the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railroad Company. Appellant is 28 years old. A daughter was born to said parties on March 28, 1916. The parties have lived in various places in this state, as appellee has been transferred in his work. Appellee's petition is based upon the charge of adultery, and appellant's cross-petition is predicated on a claim of cruel and inhuman treat

SELYA, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Michael Olusean Falae, a Nigerian national, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to remand proceedings to an immigration judge (IJ) in order to allow him to apply for adjustment of his immigration status. The proposed adjustment was based on the combined force of (i) the approval of a so-called

The plaintiff commenced an action in conversion against the defendants. Later she amended her complaint. The defendants appeared and answered the complaint as amended and the trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury. At the end of the plaintiff's case the defendants made a motion for a nonsuit. The court made an order granting the motion and the plaintiff has appealed, bringing up typewritten transcripts. In plaintiff's amended complaint she alleged that the defendants were pa

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: Appellants are inmates of the Attica Correctional Facility who have been segregated from the general inmate population of that prison in a special housing unit known as “A Block, 6 Company.” In a class suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 they contend that the segregation violates their Eighth and Four

Frederick Ford died the 10th of June, 1837, leaving a wife,' Hannah, who died the 19th of February, 1838, and two children, Emily Ford and Hannah F. Ford, now wife of William T. Vincent. Frederick Ford, by will dated 3d May, 1837, devised that his real estate be rented until his youngest child attained twenty-one, the rents to be divided between his wife, Hannah Ford, and his daughters Emily Ford and Hannah F. Ford, and if either of his children died before twenty-one, their portion to go to

232 F.3d 173 (3rd Cir. 2000) DOUG GRANT, INC., RICHARD ANDERSEN, JUDY L. BINTLIFF, LYNN V. BOHSEN, THOMAS M. BOLICK, MICHAEL BONN, ROLAND BRYANT, SR., EUGENE CLAUSER, ELMER CONOVER, SCOTT CONOVER, JOSEPH CURRAN, DINO D'ANDREA, MARK F. D'ANDREA, WARREN DAVENPORT, FRANK DELIA, KAREN DWYER, DENNIS F. FOREMAN, ROSEMARIE FRANCIS, STEPHEN FREEL, STAVROS GEORGIOU, KENNETH GROSS, ADIB HANNAH, G. HASSAN HATTINA, LEROY N. JORDAN, ROMAN KERN, RICHARD H. KESSE