Cases

OPINION SCHELLHAS, Judge. Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. FACTS Appellant Hanover Investments Inc. is a Maryland corporation and the parent company and sole owner of One Call Concepts Inc. (OCC), a Maryland corporation. Hanover’s sole purpose is to own 100% of the stock of OCC. F

ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision (Doc. 355). For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND In 2008, Defendant Plaquemines Parish (“the Parish”) hired Cateo General Contractors to construct a community center in Boothville, LA. Plaintiff Hanover Insuran

Filed 2/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 37 Jason Balvitsch and Chad Weisgram, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Dakota Burger N Fries Co

Sclafani v Allstate Ins. Co. (2004 NY Slip Op 24084) Sclafani v Allstate Ins. Co. 2004 NY Slip Op 24084 [3 Misc 3d 634] March 19, 2004 Supreme Court, Richmond County, Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered January 7, 1991, which granted the motion of third-party defendant Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp. (sued herein as Allied Maintenance Corp.) to compel plaintiff Salvatore D’Amico ("plaintiff”) to submit to an examination by a licensed occupational therapist, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion denied, and the order directing plaintiff to appear for examination vacated, wi

929 F.Supp. 764 (1996) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Plaintiff, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil No. 95-5251(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 6, 1996. *765 *766 Thomas M. Kittredge, Princeton, New Jersey, for Plaintiffs, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP.

576 F.Supp. 837 (1983) MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of the Estate of Charlotte C. Wallace, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 82 Civ. 724 (CES). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 17, 1983. *838 Kelley, Drye & Warren by Robert E. Crotty, New York City, for plaintiff.</

138 N.J. 106 (1994) 649 A.2d 379 WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., AND ITS PRESENT AND FORMER SUBSIDIARIES, WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALABAMA, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ARIZONA, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CONNECTICUT, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ILLINOIS, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF KENTUCKY, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT OF MAINE, INC.; WASTE MANAGEMENT

MEMORANDUM FILIPPINE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits after trial to the Court. The parties have filed post-trial briefs and responses thereto. The Court adopts this memorandum opinion as its findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52. The plaintiff, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), brought suit against th

MEMORANDUM CAFFREY, Chief Judge. This is a civil action brought by the Secretary of Labor against Burger King Corporation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction against defendant continuing to violate the Act and other relief including an award of back wages to certain of defendant’s employees. Defenda

684 F.Supp. 46 (1988) Joffre C. BURGER, Plaintiff, v. HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW YORK, Gerard Lynham, and Jerry Pellegrino, Defendants. No. 87 Civ. 8238 (KC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 15, 1988. *47 Arthur Wisehart and Kirk Bigelow, Wisehart and Koch, New York City, for plaintiff.

15‐2844‐bk(L) In re Motors Liquidation Co. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015 (Argued: March 15, 2016 Decided: July 13, 2016) Docket Nos. 15‐2844‐bk(L), 15‐2847‐bk(XAP), 15‐2848‐bk(XAP)

127 N.J. Super. 342 (1974) 317 A.2d 398 THE AMELCO WINDOW CORP., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 13, 1974. Decided March 26, 1974. *344 Before Judges CARTON, SEIDMAN and DEMOS. <

*1006 ORDER DENYING BEIJING-MAT-SUSHITA COLOR CRT CO.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Samuel Conti, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is Defendant Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company’s (“Defendant” or “BMCC”) motion to dismiss certain Direct Action Plaintiffs’ (“Plaintiffs” or “DAPs”) co

86 F.2d 815 (1936) BURGER BREWING CO. v. MALONEY-DAVIDSON CO. et al. No. 7041. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. December 15, 1936. *816 Frank Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Murray & Zugelter, Alphonse G. Riesenberg, and Lawrence H. Steltenpohl, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Crawford, Middleton, Milner & Seelbach, o

Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. California imposes two insurance taxes on insurance companies doing business in the State. A premiums tax, set at a fixed percentage of premiums paid on insurance policies is*650sued in the State, is imposed on both foreign and domestic insurance companies and a “retaliatory” tax, set in response to the

726 F.2d 930 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,643CHEMICAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., Defendant-Appellant.MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY and First PennsylvaniaBank, N.A., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., Defendant-Appellant.SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 109, Docket 83-729

ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge: Appellants, 2 a reorganized Chapter 11 Bankruptcy debtor, filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that appellee’s claim stemming from an assumed contract was discharged in the debtor’s earlier bankruptcy proceedings. At summary judgment, the bankruptcy court determined that the claim w

428 F.Supp.2d 725 (2006) Melissa MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, CO. et al., Defendants, Casey FULLER,[1] Plaintiff, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH, CO. et al., Defendants. Nos. C2-04-306, C2-05-596. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2006. *726

461 F.Supp.2d 155 (2006) SIRIUS AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SCPIE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 05Civ.7923 (BSJ)(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 1, 2006. *156 Michael H. Goldstein, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, New York City, for Plaintiff. David John McLean, Latham &