Cases

994 A.2d 411 (2010) 413 Md. 606 WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION v. Shaaron PHILLIPS, et al. James K. Sillers v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. Allen W. Cartwright, Jr. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. Nos. 85, September Term, 2009, 154, September Term, 2008. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Argued June 5,

Talbott, J. C. C., Temporarily Assigned. Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (Liberty) moves for summary judgment against plaintiff, plain tiff Clarence S. Frazier to *129compel Mm to accept $15 a week on an income continuation claim made under his automobile insurance policy. The underlying suit is based upon an accident which occurred on August 23,

150 N.J. Super. 123 (1977) 374 A.2d 1259 CLARENCE S. FRAZIER, PLAINTIFF, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided April 7, 1977. *128 Mr. Joseph Asbell for plaintiff (Messrs. Joseph Asbell & Associates, P.A., attorneys). Mr. Bruce M. Gun

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2347 MATTHEW A. COPLEY; JOLINDA M. COPLEY, Debtors - Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellant, and USBC-RICHMOND (UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT) Party-in-Interest. Appeal from the Unit

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES MCRITCHIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0890-JTL ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL K. ) SANDBERG, ROBERT M. KIMMITT, ) PEGGY ALFORD, MARC L.

ORDER H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff move for summary judgment.1 This motion is opposed and defendants and intervenor-defendants cross-move for summary judgment.2 The cross-motions are opposed.3 Oral argument was

OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Kings Local School District Board of Education, Jerry Gasper, and Shelley Bogaert (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 17). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition (Doc. 20) and subsequently filed an amended response in opposition (Doc. 26). Defendants have filed a rep

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-757L (Filed: May 18, 2018) ********************** GADSDEN INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC, Takings Clause; inverse condemnation; Plaintiff, U.S. Const. amend. V; cognizable property v.

MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J. ¶ 1. This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, which affirmed in part and reversed in part the Milwaukee County Circuit Court's1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Milwaukee Police Association ("Police Association") and the Milwaukee Professional Fire Fighters Association Local 215 ("Fire Fighters Association"). Black v. City of Milwaukee,

117 P.3d 227 (2005) Frank KAHN, As Personal Representative for William Kahn, Deceased, and Christine Kahn, Individually and as Trustee of the Kahn Family Trust, Appellants, v. MORSE & MOWBRAY, a Nevada Professional Corporation; and Christopher H. Byrd, Individually, Respondents. Nos. 41148, 41508. Supreme Court of Nevada. August 11, 2005.

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: Because these three appeals raise common questions of law, we dispose of them in a single opinion. Plaintiffs, Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers — Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust (“Operating Engineers”), New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, and Boilermakers-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (collectively, “Union Plaintiffs”); Wyoming State Treasu

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE SEARS HOMETOWN AND OUTLET ) CONSOLIDATED STORES, INC. STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2019-0798-JTL POST-TRIAL OPINION Date Submitted: November 4, 2023 Date Decided: January 24, 2024 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Michael C. Wagner, Jiahui (Rose) Wang, LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Peter B. Andre

Stec v. Fuzion Inv. Capital, LLC, 2012 NCBC 24. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE MECKLENBURG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 11 CVS 4241 JEFFREY R. STEC, Plaintiff, v. FUZION INVESTMENT CAPITAL, LLC, FUZION CAPITAL, LLC, FUZION CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, EDWARD F. SAMPSON, Individually and on behalf of SAMPSON F

610 F.3d 452 (2010) Deborah A. KENSETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-3219. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 27, 2009. Decided June 28, 2010. *455 Lisa C. Goldman, Attorney (argued), Lawton & Cates, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appella

832 A.2d 207 (2003) 377 Md. 115 ATLANTIC GOLF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. MARYLAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. No. 64, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 11, 2003. Jeff Evan Lowinger, Vincent C. Burke, III (Furey, Doolan & Abell, LLP, on brief), Chevy Chase, for petitioner. George A. Nilson (Natalie F

*430ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, Senior Judge. This case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Cla

229 F.Supp.2d 43 (2002) Stephen PAYNE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., Defendant. No. CIV.A.01-10118-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 7, 2002. *44 *45 Kevin T. Peters, Todd & Weld, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs. James K. Archibald,

689 F.Supp.2d 910 (2010) John T. VALENTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-225. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. January 4, 2010. *914 John Valente, Dayton, OH, pro se. Jennifer Nicole Fuller, Paul Gerard Hallinan, Dayton, OH, for Defendant.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman