Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harold Willis Brooks”
Willis v. Willispublic domain
In October 2006, Suzanne Glaze Willis ("the mother") filed a complaint seeking a *Page 348 divorce from Brandyn Lee Willis ("the father"). In her complaint, the mother sought, among other things, an award of custody of the parties' two minor children, an award of child support, and an equitable division of the marital property. The father answered and counterclaimed, seeking an award of custody of the children. On November 7, 2006, the moth
Brooks v. State Board of Electionspublic domain
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge. ORDER I. INTRODUCTION After nearly nine years of litigation in this Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) class action, the representative Plaintiffs now move, under F.R.Civ.P. 23(d) and 41(a)(2), to decertify the class and dismiss the case without prejudice. They concede that intervening law forecloses the remedy they have sought; hence, they “no longer
Brooks v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-843L (Filed: June 27, 2018) *************************************** ALEX BROOKS, JR. et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Taking; * Threshold Title Issues; Centerline v.
State of Tennessee v. Harold Francis Butlerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 22, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HAROLD FRANCIS BUTLER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 280013 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2014-00631-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 11, 2015 The defendant, Harold Francis Butler,1 appeals his Hamilton County Criminal
901 P.2d 1300 (1995) 79 Hawai`i 321 HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a public body and body corporate and politic, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAROLD K.L. CASTLE FOUNDATION, a Hawai`i non-profit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and Earl Leroy Walker, Gary Lynn Wiseman, Jane Saeko Ikeda, Kiyoshi Ikeda, Gwenette Ann Higa, Roland W. Eaker, Defendants-Appellants, and Jane Ann Wade Benouis; Mustapha Kemal Benouis
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Park Circle Motor Co. v. Willispublic domain
201 Md. 104 (1952) 92 A.2d 757 PARK CIRCLE MOTOR CO. v. WILLIS [No. 8, October Term, 1952.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 5, 1952. Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, filed December 30, 1952. Motion for reargument denied, motion for clarification granted, and opinion filed, February 12, 1953.</
United States v. Harold J. Jonespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 97-2176 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Harold J. Jones, * *
Brooks v. Wardpublic domain
ORDER McMILLAN, District Judge. On December 18, 1980, four prisoners, Wayne Brooks, Clarence Wheeler, Lee Roy Steele, and Kenneth Helms, filed this suit, pro se, against Jack Ward, Superintendent of the Union County Prison Unit, Subsidiary # 4550, of the North Carolina Department of Correction. They sought damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief, on behalf of themselves and all white pr
Allstate Insurance v. Estate of Hancockpublic domain
345 S.C. 81 (2001) 545 S.E.2d 845 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. ESTATE OF Thomas Adam HANCOCK, Estate of Johnny Blyther, Estate of James Brooks, Sr., James Brooks, Jr., and the Estate of Harold Connell Hancock, Willie K. Brooks, Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants, Of whom Estate of Thomas Adam Hancock and Estate of Johnny Blyther are Appellants. No. 3328.
People v. Brookspublic domain
37 Ill. App.3d 66 (1976) 344 N.E.2d 662 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAROLD LEROY BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 75-171. Illinois Appellate Court Third District. Opinion filed March 31, 1976. Braud, Warner & Neppl, of Rock Island (Dennis A. DePorter, of counsel), for appellant. David DeDoncker, St
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. In this consolidated appeal, Harold J. Jones, James O. Cashaw, and John L. Palmer appeal from their convictions and from the sentences imposed by the district court1 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l)-(b)(l) and 846. We affirm on all issues other than Cashaw’s four-level enhancement as a lead
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-EC-01526-SCT RICKEY W. THOMPSON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, LEE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, AND LEE COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, AND MARCUS CRUMP DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/21/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM A. GOWAN, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT
Pride v. Statepublic domain
Oliver Eugene Pride appeals the circuit court's summary denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief, in which he attacked his 1984 conviction for first-degree rape and his resulting sentence, as an habitual felony offender, of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. This Court affirmed Pride's conviction and sentence on appeal, Pride v. State, 473 So.2d 576 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984), and issued a certific
Roseburg Forest Products Company v. Barnespublic domain
Melton, Justice. On August 13, 1993, Willie Barnes suffered an amputation of his left leg below the knee in an industrial accident at the Georgia-Pacific (GP) wood processing plant where he worked. GP, its insurer Georgia Conversion Primary Insurance Company (Georgia Conversion), and its workers’ compensation servicing agent CCMSI, accepted the claim as catastrophic and began payi
Willis v. Hillpublic domain
*851Eberhardt, Judge. This case was tried and all rulings were made prior to the effective date of the Civil Practice Act; consequently its provisions have no application on appeal. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co., 116 Ga. App. 376 (157 SE2d 493). Because of provisions of the Act itself, e.g., § 86, the cases of Fulton County v. Spratlin, 210 Ga. 447
Juan Alaniz v. the O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Assoc., LLP, the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Abel Manjipublic domain
JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard
Foster v. Fulton Countypublic domain
223 F.Supp.2d 1301 (2002) Ruben FOSTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FULTON COUNTY, Georgia, et al., Defendants. No. 1:99-CV-900-MHS. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. July 12, 2002. Jerry Davis, Glennville, GA, movant pro se. Thomas McKee West, Office of Thomas M. West, Atlanta, GA, Brenda Loyce Gardner, Brenda Gardner & Associates,
Kinsey v. Kolberpublic domain
103 Ill. App.3d 933 (1982) 431 N.E.2d 1316 DAVID S. KINSEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WARREN J. KOLBER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 80-2723. Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division). Opinion filed January 18, 1982. *934 *935 Willis R. Tribler and Doug
Adams v. M.A. Hanna Co.public domain
603 S.E.2d 402 (2004) Carl ADAMS, Doyle Woodrow Alexander, Audrey Louise Allison, Albert William Arrington, Jr., James Ronnie Arrington, Judith Hope Arrington, Hoyt Jay Barnes, Sammy Barnett, Tommy Barnette, Roger Dean Beasley, Carroll Beck, Glenn Ray Beck, James Arthur Beck, Thurman Blaine, Trudie Marie Blaine, James Bolden, Terry Lee Browning, Grady Dallas Bryson, Mack C. Bryson, Verlin Leo Bryson, Gordon J. Buchanan, Harold Dempsey Buchanan, Nancy Buc