Cases

153 B.R. 84 (1993) In the Matter of Quinton B. HARPER, Carlette M. Harper, Debtors. Quinton B. HARPER, Carlette M. Harper, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. A92-67697-ADK, Adv. No. 92-6492. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 20, 1993. Lawrence R. Landry, Decatur, GA, for plaintiffs. Joe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MONTE SILVER, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 20-1544 (CKK) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 7, 2022) This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ 1 [9] Motion to Dismiss.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James Harper v. Civil No. 1:20-cv-00771-JL Opinion No. 2023 DNH 066P Charles P. Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service, et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER This case concerns the constitutionality of the Internal Revenue Service’s u

285 B.R. 284 (2002) In re William D. WOODS, Debtor. William D. Woods, Plaintiff, v. Internal Revenue Service and Indiana Department of Revenue, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-01694-JKC-7, Adversary No. 01-212. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. August 30, 2002. *285 Michael F. Harper, Indianap

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: The Harper Group (Harper) and certain of its domestic subsidiaries purchased insurance policies from Rampart Insurance Co., Ltd. (Rampart) and deducted the premiums for income tax purposes. Rampart is a wholly owned subsidiary of two of Harper’s subsidiaries. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) determined that because of the relationsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James Harper v. Civil No. 20-cv-771-JD Opinion No. 2021 DNH 056 Charles P. Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, et al. O R D E R James Harper brought this civil rights suit against Commissioner Charles Rettig, the IRS, and various u

2023 IL App (1st) 220078 Opinion filed: May 4, 2023 FIRST DISTRICT FOURTH DIVISION No. 1-22-0078 KATHLEEN HARPER, as a Taxpayer of the City of ) Appeal from the Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, and as a ) Circuit Court of Taxpaye

THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent because I have a different view of appellant’s contentions and a different view of how the law should be applied in this particular type of tax subpoena enforcement action. The district court erred, in my opinion, in ruling during the hearing that appellant-taxpayer was not entitled to an adversary hearing. Adm

CARNES, Circuit Judge: Billie Vester Rasbury and Bill’s Forestry Service, Inc. (“Bill’s Forestry”), appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion under 26 U.S.C.A. § 7430 (1989) for recovery of costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in their successful defense of an Internal Revenue Service claim for federal withholding taxes, interest, and penalties in a bankruptcy procee

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Appellant Donald M. Fitzpatrick appeals from a district court judgment granting him the statutory minimum $1,000 damages for injuries from violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and awarding $3,000 of a requested $19,700 in attorneys’ fees. Appellant contends that the district court erred in not gra

USCA11 Case: 20-11050 Date Filed: 06/23/2021 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-11050 ________________________ Agency No. 005600-17 TOT PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, TOT LAND MAN

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-2064 Filed November 25, 2015 FIRST MIDWEST BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TED BRECKENFELDER, Defendant-Appellant. and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and MICHELE R. WHITE, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Marlita A. Greve (foreclosure) and Paul L. Macek (jury

279 S.W.3d 251 (2009) Riley Calvin HARPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent. No. SD 29180. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. April 1, 2009. *252 Justin H. Nelson, Garrett & Silvey, West Plains, Missouri, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, and Jere

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1565 JAMES HARPER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOHN DOE IRS AGENTS 1-10. Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1316 JAMES HARPER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CHARLES P. RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOHN DOE IRS AGENTS 1-10, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

260 B.R. 806 (2001) In re Pendleton C. WAUGH, Debtor. Pendleton C. Waugh, Appellant, v. Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. Bankruptcy No. 396-35759-SF-7. Adversary No. 398-33721. Civ.A. No. 3:99-CV-1260-L. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 28, 2001. *807 Steven A. Felsenthal, Dallas, TX, pro

TACHA, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Theresia and Larry Frazee and their childr

118 S.W.3d 195 (2003) Stephen Paul HARPER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent. No. WD 62533. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 2, 2003. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied October 28, 2003. *197 Robert H. Martin, Independence, MO, for Appellant. James R. Layton, Jeff

MEMORANDUM ** Charles C. Douglass, Jr., M.D., appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the underlying judgment dismissing his action for failure to serve defendants. We grant Crellin Derrick Douglass’ request for joinder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Harman v. Harper, 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1993), and we affir

No. 127,390 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel. KRIS KOBACH, Attorney General, Petitioner/Appellee, v. DAVID HARPER, Director of Vehicles, Department of Revenue, in His Official Capacity, and MARK BURGHART, Secretary of Revenue, in His Official Capacity, Respondents/Appellees,