Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harris v. Coffee”
Kozma v. Starbucks Coffee Co.public domain
990 A.2d 679 (2010) 412 N.J. Super. 319 Philip KOZMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, Lionetti Enterprises, LLC, Pavers Plus Landscaping, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and Lionetti Enterprises, LLC, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Pavers Plus Landscaping, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. DOCKET NO. A-3908-08T3. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellat
United States v. John Joseph Coffee, Jr.public domain
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendant John Joseph Coffee, Jr., was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court denied defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 29.
The Coffee Beanery Ltd. v. WW LLCpublic domain
501 F.Supp.2d 955 (2007) THE COFFEE BEANERY LTD., Joanne Shaw, Julius Shaw, Kevin Shaw, Kurt Shaw, Ken Coxen, Walter Pilon, and Owen Steam, Petitioners, v. WW L.L.C., Deborah Williams, and Richard Welshans, Respondents. No. 06-10408. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 23, 2007. *956 Joshua R. Fink
S-Mart, Inc. v. Sweetwater Coffee Co., Ltd.public domain
744 N.E.2d 580 (2001) S-MART, INC., Appellant-Plaintiff, v. SWEETWATER COFFEE CO., LTD., Harry A. Wilson, Jr. and Betty A. Wilson, Appellees-Defendants. No. 29A05-0002-CV-79. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 28, 2001. *582 Casey D. Cloyd, Brooke & Cloyd, P.C., Muncie, Indiana, John T. Drics, O'Bryan, Brazill & Drics, In
COFFEE v. the STATE.public domain
Bethel, Judge. *443 This case turns on a fundamental principle essential to ensuring fair jury trials in Georgia. Our general rule is that a criminal defendant is entitled to a full panel of qualified jurors to which to direct his peremptory strikes. Because this case inv
Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 30, 2024 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00973-CR JOHNATHAN ROBERT COFFEE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.
Melinda Keeling v. Coffee County, Tennesseepublic domain
09/18/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 10, 2018 Session MELINDA KEELING V. COFFEE COUNTY, TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 40613 J. Curtis Smith, Judge No. M2017-01809-COA-R3-CV After a
OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: Petitioners, the people of the state of California through their Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, the California Public Utilities Commission, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, and Southern California Edison (“the California Parties”), seek review of a series of orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
77 B.R. 62 (1987) In re MORNING TREAT COFFEE COMPANY, INC., Debtor. FOSTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MORNING TREAT COFFEE COMPANY, INC. and Southern Coffee Company, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 84-00842, Adv. No. 85-0188. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana. June 5, 1987. *63 Jack P. Harris, Baton
852 F.Supp. 1235 (1994) CONTINENTAL COFFEE PRODUCTS CO., Plaintiff, v. BANQUE LAVORO S.A., BSI-Banca Della Svizzera Italiana, Pedro Uribe A. Sucesores LTDA, Banque Du Gothard, Banque Worms, Banque Bruxelles Lambert (Suisse) S.A., Bank Mees & Hope NV, Bayerische Vereinsbank S.A. (BV France), Bozzo USA Trading Inc., a Subsidiary of Bozzo Commerce De Cafe, Bozzo Commerce De Cafe and Bozzo Brazil S.A., and XYZ Corp., that name being fictitious, t
Harris v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Co
841 P.2d 333 (1992) COOK INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Colorado general partnership, Plaintiff, v. SEVEN-ELEVEN COFFEE SHOP, INC., a Colorado corporation, and Beverly Eberle, Third-Party Plaintiffs and Defendants-Appellants, v. HARRIS HOTEL, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. No. 91CA0970. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. April 23, 1992. Rehearing Denied May 28
State v. harrispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA [do not modify or remove this line] No. COA20-309 Filed: [do not modify or remove this line] Rowan County, No. 16 CRS 2384, 53102-03 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SINDY LINA ABBITT Rowan County, No. 16 CRS 54029, 54042-43 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DANIEL ALBARRAN Appeal by defendants from judgments entered 13 Mar
Spears v. Coffeepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 105 OPINION The underlying negligence lawsuit was brought by Walter and Connie Spears, individually and as next friends of their son, Michael Spears, for injuries suffered by Michael in the home of Darrell and Jennifer Coffee. Michael was injured when he was assaulted by anothe
Harris v. Turchettapublic domain
622 A.2d 487 (1993) Harold J. HARRIS et al. v. Alexander TURCHETTA d.b.a. Camille's Coffee Shop, Inc. et al. No. 91-566-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 31, 1993. *488 Robert S. Parker, Barry J. Kusinitz, Corrente, Brill & Kusinitz, Providence, for plaintiffs. Gerard M. DeCelles, Levitt & DeCelles, Prov
United States v. Coffeepublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0030p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNIT
Cotter v. Harrispublic domain
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING The opinion of December 20, 1991, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor. The plaintiff, Ross R. Cotter, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, William J. Harris, Ruth Harris, and Martin-Colley Drug Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Martin-Colley"), in a judicial foreclosure action. On February 22, 1977, William Harris, individually and as representative of Martin-
In Re Saxby's Coffee Worldwide, LLCpublic domain
436 B.R. 331 (2010) In re SAXBY'S COFFEE WORLDWIDE, LLC, Debtor(s). No. 09-15898 ELF. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 22, 2010. As Amended September 24, 2010. *332 Corinne Michele Samler, Paul J. Winterhalter, Paul J. Winterhalter, PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM<
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RICHARD HERMAN d/b/a H & H COFFEE AND WATER, Appellant, v. JOSEPH LOPEZ, SAN GIORGIO COFFEE, LLC, and MIA COFFEE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellees. No. 4D2023-2414 [January 22, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for th
United States v. Anthony Harrispublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1210 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Anthony Martinez Harris, also known as Maurice Terrell Williams