Cases

PER CURIAM. Callie A. Harris appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of social security supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We must uphold the Commissioner’s disability determination if it is supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Hays v. Sullivan, 907 F.2

ORDER Arnold Harris appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his application for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROSEN, District Judge. On February 7, 2001, Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff filed objections to the R & R on February 20, 2001. The Court

PER CURIAM: John Zech appeals the magistrate judge’s award of-attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) after his successful appeal of the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Zech argues that the district court abused its discretion when it compensated him for the work of two non-admitted attorneys, Howard Olinsky and Paul Eaglin, at the

PER CURIAM: We have reviewed the briefs and the relevant parts of the record. Giving due deference to the Administrative Law Judge’s opportunity to make credibility determinations and responsibility for weighing the evidence, we conclude that the magistrate judge’s determination that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Miguel Lopez’s applications for a period of disability, disa

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. Co

PER CURIAM: Thomas Scott Henry appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Henry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by (1) refusing to give pr

601 F.3d 1268 (2010) Pervis L. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-12529. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 2, 2010. *1269 Richard A. Culbertson, Law Office of Richard A. Culbertson, Orlando, FL, for Jackson. Nadine DeLuca Elder, Christopher Gen

PER CURIAM: Cornelius Washington appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Mr. Washington primarily argues that the Appeals Council erred when it refused to consi

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Sonya Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for remand and affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. Hunter contends that the district court should have remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedin

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: I. Valinda S. Kornhauser brought this lawsuit to challenge the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for disability benefits. The District Court referred the case to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation (“R&R”) on the merits of Kornhauser’s challenge. On receiving the referral, the M

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant David A. Workman appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security. Workman filed his application on July 28,1998, alleging an inability to work due to a heart condition, rib surgery, right arm problems, dizziness, shortness of breath, fatigue, back pain and depression. After W

328 F.Supp.2d 703 (2004) Harry L. SNIDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 01-10012-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. July 19, 2004. *704 *705 Lewis M. Seward, Seward, Tally, Bay City, MI, for Plaintiff. William L. Woodard,

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two questions about Rachel Parks’s application for supplemental security income on behalf of her minor son, D.P.: (1) whether the administrative law judge’s denial of Parks’s application was supported by substantial evidence; and (2) whether the Social Security Appeals Council must make explicit findings of fact about new evidence

*928 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Stefania Harris applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denied Harris’s application. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined

265 F.Supp.2d 177 (2003) Harry RODRIGUEZ ROCHE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. CIV. 02-2047 HL-JAC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 24, 2003. *178 Oscar Crespo López, Ponce, PR, for Plaintiff. Camille L. Velez Rivé United States Attorney's Office, Torre Chardon, Hato Rey,

96 F.3d 1432 Carl Harrisv.Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social Security NO. 95-5875 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 15, 1996 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-cv-00406 1 AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM: Leticia Medina appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social .Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. She challenges the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) on several grounds. First, she contends that the ALJ erred in failing to find that all of her impairments were severe. Second, she argues that the ALJ did not adequately explain why he gave lit

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1394 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1394 DAWN M. DRUMGOLD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant –

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Phyllis Elam, on behalf of her minor daughter Kamea Golay, appeals a district court judgment affirming the Commission *125 er’s termination of supplemental security income benefits. The parties have waived oral argument and this p