⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Harris v. Meulemans”

Harris v. Meulemanspublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005-09-23 · Published · cited 1× · 389 F. Supp. 2d 438; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22087; 2005 WL 2338882
389 F.Supp.2d 438 (2005) Willie HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Lt. R. MEULEMANS, Warden Leslie Brooks, Vincent Santopietro, and Peter Matos, Defendants. No. 3:02 CV 1580 JBA. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 23, 2005. *439 Willie Harris, Somers, CT, pro se. Neil D. Parille, Attorney General's Office, Hartford
California Supreme Court · 2011-12-29 · Published · cited 46× · 266 P.3d 953; 53 Cal. 4th 170; 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 247
53 Cal.4th 170 (2011) 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 247 266 P.3d 953 FRANCES HARRIS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; FRANCES HARRIS et al., Real Parties in Interest.<
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 580 So. 2d 561; 1991 La. App. LEXIS 1386; 1991 WL 86211
GUIDRY, Judge. Joseph Tommy Deville, who allegedly sustained a work-related knee injury, instituted this worker’s compensation suit against his former employer, the State of Louisiana, T.H. Harris Vocational Technical School. The trial court sustained defendant’s peremptory exception of prescription and dismissed plaintiff’s suit. Plaintiff appeals. FACTS Joseph Tommy Deville (Tommy) i
Meikle v. Watsonpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 2003-04-18 · Published · cited 4× · 69 P.3d 100; 138 Idaho 680; 2003 Ida. LEXIS 67
69 P.3d 100 (2003) 138 Idaho 680 Robert MEIKLE, an individual; Rex and Vernita B. Meikle, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Torry WATSON, an individual, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27408. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2003 Term. April 18, 2003. *101 Cooper & Larsen, Pocatello, for appell
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012-05-22 · Published · cited 2× · 42 A.3d 494; 135 Conn. App. 735; 2012 WL 1673624; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 245
42 A.3d 494 (2012) 135 Conn.App. 735 Frank VANDEVER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 30646. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 13, 2012. Decided May 22, 2012. *495 Frank Vandever, pro se, the appellant (petitioner). Madeline A. Melchionne, assistant attorney general, wit
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 3× · 260 B.R. 158; 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 323; 2001 WL 310620
260 B.R. 158 (2001) In re Joseph L. MILLER, Debtor. Lois Murphy, Plaintiff, v. The Provident Bank, an Ohio Banking Corporation; and Household Finance Corporation, lii, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 99-03410. Adversary No. 00-6319. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. March 26, 2001. *159 Jed W. Manwa
California Court of Appeal · 2001-01-23 · Published · cited 11× · 103 Cal. Rptr. 2d 421; 86 Cal. App. 4th 486; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 692; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 849; 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 33
103 Cal.Rptr.2d 421 (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 486 The NIPPON CREDIT BANK, LTD., Los Angeles Agency, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. 1333 NORTH CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD et al., Defendants and Appellants. Nos. A084401, A086021. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. January 23, 2001. Review Denied May 16, 2001.
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007-12-18 · Published · cited 12× · 936 A.2d 665; 105 Conn. App. 65; 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 463
936 A.2d 665 (2007) 105 Conn.App. 65 Eduardo MARTINEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 27798. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 21, 2007. Decided December 18, 2007. *667 Christopher M. Neary, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner). Madeline A. Melch
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990-03-14 · Published · cited 39× · 897 F.2d 1457; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725; 1990 WL 26463
BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge. Luis Rosario appeals the district court’s 1 judgment subjecting $91,960.00 in seized currency to forfeiture as drug proceeds under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) (1982). Rosario contends that the judgment should be reversed because DEA agents seized the money in violation of his fourth amendment ri
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985-04-16 · Published · cited 3× · 468 So. 2d 1382
468 So.2d 1382 (1985) Nelson DEROUSELLE, Plaintiff, v. George K. KONECNY, Defendant. No. 84 CA 0189. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 16, 1985. *1383 Edward J. Milligan, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiff Nelson Derouselle. Robert L. Ellender, Lafayette, for intervenor-appellee Audubon Ins. Co. Sera H.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-11-22 · Published · cited 302× · 70 F.3d 1507
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. The United States presented evidence at the appellants’ trial tending to show that Jerry Lee Lewis participated in and became the leader of a powerful criminal racketeering enterprise that for over ten years controlled a large percentage of the market for T’s and Blues (a heroin substitute), heroin, and cocaine in north St. Louis. Lewis obtained and maintained his position by murdering competitors an
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 228 So. 2d 508; 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5665
CULPEPPER, Judge. Plaintiff seeks workmen’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability. He injured his wrist while working for the defendant, Sterling Gachassin Beer Distributor. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appealed. The sole issue is whether plaintiff suffered any work-connected disability beyond the period of about one month for which compensation was paid. The
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-11-22 · Published · cited 245× · 70 F.3d 1507; 43 Fed. R. Serv. 321; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32696
70 F.3d 1507 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 321 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carlton DARDEN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carla Simone SEALS, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Michael WILLIAMS, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Raymond AMERSON, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Gerald Douglas HOPKINS, Appella
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961-11-06 · Published · cited 3× · 134 So. 2d 665; 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1455
134 So.2d 665 (1961) Elton DOUCET v. ASHY CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc. No. 337. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 6, 1961. Rehearing Denied December 4, 1961. Certiorari Denied January 15, 1962. Guillory & Guillory by Isom J. Guillory, Jr., Eunice, for defendant-appellant. Sandoz & Sandoz by William C. Sa
Larned v. Wallacepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962-11-05 · Published · cited 7× · 146 So. 2d 434
146 So.2d 434 (1962) Arthur Fred LARNED, III., Plaintiff & Appellant, v. E. M. "Hy" WALLACE, d/b/a Hy's Casing Crew and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Defendants and Appellees. No. 653. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 5, 1962. Rehearing Denied November 28, 1962. Certiorari Denied January 25, 1963.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 103 So. 2d 292; 1958 La. App. LEXIS 888
ELLIS, Judge. In this suit for workmen’s compensation benefits, the plaintiff, Huey Vidrine, sued Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, the compensation's insurer, Central Excavating Company, Inc. The plaintiff was employed by Central Excavating Company, Inc., on November 23, 1956, when he was allegedly injured during the course and scope of his employment. Vidrine claims that he is totally and permanent
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1972-12-29 · Published · cited 0× · 364 F. Supp. 134; 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 405; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10526
364 F.Supp. 134 (1972) NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The SWISS COLONY, INC., Defendant. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY CHEESE CO., INC., Defendant. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ARMOUR AND COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 3555, 3637, 3639. United States District Court, W. D. Wisconsin.