Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harris v. Moore”
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
752 So.2d 1241 (2000) Katherine HARRIS, as Secretary of State, Appellant, v. Carlton MOORE, and Jane Carroll, as Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Appellees. No. 4D00-202. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 3, 2000. Rehearing Denied March 29, 2000. *1242 Robert A. Butterworth, Attor
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
912 S.W.2d 860 (1995) Russell HARRIS, Appellant, v. Dennis J. MOORE d/b/a Moore's Trucking, Appellee. No. 03-95-00146-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. December 20, 1995. *861 David L. Cunningham, John M. Killian & Associates, San Antonio, for Appellant. Darrell D. Gest, Hearne & Eppright, Austin, for Appellee
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
In re Harris, Harry H., Ill; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 367-917; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 95-CA-0710. Denied.
537 U.S. 1033 HARRISv.MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 02-6331. Supreme Court of United States. November 18, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
By JUDGE JAMES H. CHAMBLIN On January 5, 1990, counsel argued Harris’s motion for entry of a decree deeming his response to Moore’s second request for admissions as being timely filed. The responses were due under Rule 4:11(a) on or before September 29, 1989. The response was served upon Moore’s counsel in early November, 1989. After a review of the pleadings and other papers in the court file and consider
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
740 S.W.2d 14 (1987) Joann S. HARRIS, Relator, v. The Honorable Brunson MOORE, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, Respondent. No. 08-87-00219-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. September 23, 1987. Robert Earp, Schwartz, Earp, McClure, Cohen & Stewart, Gordon Stewart, Schwartz, Earp, McClure, Cohen & Stewart, El Paso, for respond
Moore v. Harrispublic domain
Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Harris v. Moorepublic domain
753 F.2d 1079 Harrisv.Moore 84-1273 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. 1/24/85 1 N.D.Ill. DISMISSED
In the Matter of the Marriage of Andrea Shawn Harris Moore and David Alan Moore v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 12-22-00286-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF THE § APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY MARRIAGE OF ANDREA SHAWN HARRIS MOORE AND DAVID ALAN § COURT AT LAW NO 2 MOORE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMO
Moore v. Harrispublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.
Harris Teeter, Inc. v. Moore & Van Allen, PLLCpublic domain
Justice KITTREDGE. This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment to the law firm of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC and attorney W. Howell Morrison (Respondents). We certified the appeal of Harris Teeter, Inc. pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genu
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-IA-01316-SCT COAHOMA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, GERALD JOHNSON, COREEN RICHARDSON, RICO SMITH, MILROY HARRIS AND JOHNNIE MOORE v. DARYL MOORE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/31/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. C. KENT HANEY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: OLIVER EARL CLARK, JR. LAURA FORD ROSE
Harris v. Harrispublic domain
PITTMAN, Judge. Kim Deloris Harris appeals from the dismissal of her divorce complaint against Vernon Lamont Harris. We reverse. On April 24, 2012, Kim filed a complaint alleging, among other things, that she and Vernon had been married on September 28, 1996; that they had lived together as husband and wife until their separation on November 28, 2010; and that one child, whose date of birth was February 17
State v. Moorepublic domain
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DARNELL MOORE (SC 19869) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins and Kahn, Js. Argued January 18—officially released December 24, 2019 Procedural History Substitute information charging the defendant with the crime of murder, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New London, where the court, Page 76 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL December 24,
State v. Harrispublic domain
STONE, J. *151Following a jury trial, the defendant, Danny Harris, was found guilty as charged of aggravated flight from an officer. Harris was sentenced to serve 3½ years at hard labor and now appeals his conviction. For the following reasons, Harris' conviction and sentence are reversed. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY</