Cases

OPINION Thomas P. Griesa, United States District Judge Plaintiff Sharon Sullivan brings claims of employment discrimination and retaliation against her former employers, defendant New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”) and defendant New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiff Collette Henry (“Henry”), an employee of the New York City Health & Hospital Corporation (“HHC”), brings claims of discrimination and retaliation against HHC and several former supervisors (collectively, “defendants”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C.

43 F.Supp.2d 407 (1999) Ade A. ADENIJI, Plaintiff, v. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN SERVICES, NYC, Defendant. No. 97 Civ. 5827(KMW). United States District Court S.D. New York. March 30, 1999. *408 *409 *410 *411 Ade A. Ad

302 F.Supp.2d 256 (2004) Donovan HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, and New York City Human Resources Administration, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 5817(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 29, 2004. *257 Donovan Howard, Haverhill, MA, Pro se. *258 Donald Christ

179 F.Supp.2d 177 (2001) HOUSING WORKS, INC., Bruno Alicia, James Arnold, Paul Alston, Douglas Cho-Hill, Reyes Cruz, Patrick D. Dolby, Dexter C. Duskin, Earl C. Ellis, Yvette Gregory, Barry Harris, Iesha Jackson, Donile Knight, Takeasha Newton, Laverne Patent, Tatia Smith, Velisa Green Summerlin, Jan Thurman, Robert Tolbert, Roberto Valderrama, Plaintiffs, v. Jason TURNER, Human Resources Administration (HRA) Administrator/Department of Social Se

OPINION OF THE COURT Wilson, J. New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA, or the Union) filed an improper practice petition with the Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York (the Board), alleging that it had a right to information, under Administrative Code of the City of New York (New York City Collective Bargaining Law [NYCCBL]) § 12-306 (c) (4), in connection with disciplinary proceedings br

Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge This case is brought by the National Restaurant Association - a foodservice trade association - and its legal arm, the Restaurant Law Center. Plaintiffs claim that a recently enacted New York City law and regulation requiring fast food employers in the City to create and administer a payroll deduction scheme - under which employees can donate a portion of their wages to certain non-prof

Rivera, J. (dissenting). Defendant Jose Aviles claims the New York Police Department (NYPD) violated his federal and state equal protection and due process rights when it denied him a physical coordination test based solely on his language skills. The People defend the NYPD policy of offering the coordination test to everyone except those persons who are *507perceived to be

*379MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs, Benjamin Case, Elizabeth Catlin, Jennifer Klein, and Mark Kushneir, bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (the “City) and nine individual defendants employed by the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), alleging that their constitutional righ

414 F.Supp.2d 193 (2006) Sharon HAYES, Plaintiff, v. Bernard KERIK, Commissioner, New York City Department of Corrections and New York City Department of Corrections, Defendants. No. CV-99-5725(SJF)(CLP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 8, 2006. *194 *195

OPINION & ORDER GERSHON, District Judge: Plaintiff Steven Castro brings this action seeking damages and equitable relief pursuant to Titles I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794); 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws (New York State Executive Law § 296 and N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107, res

633 F.Supp.2d 42 (2009) Robin WINSTON, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP., Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 4072(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 16, 2009. *44 Nils C. Shillito, Stephen D. Hans & Associates, P.C., Stephen D. Hans, Stephen D. Hans & Associates, P.C(LIC), Long Island City, NY, for Plaintiff.<

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLASSER, Senior United States District Judge: Nyahali Pediford-Aziz ' (“Plaintiff’), alleging unlawful retaliation, brings suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12203(ADA), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 (N.Y.SHRL), against five defendants: the City of New York, the NYC Department of Education (DOE), the Office of Safety and Youth D

21-1527-cv Allison Williams v. New York City Housing Authority 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2021 7 8 (Argued: June 10, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2023) 9 10 Docket No. 21-1527-cv 11 12

People v Watkins (2024 NY Slip Op 02842) People v Watkins 2024 NY Slip Op 02842 [42 NY3d 635] May 23, 2024 Halligan, J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge. This case — filed shortly after Hurricane Irene in 2011 — raises the question of whether the City of New York’s emergency preparedness plans adequately address the needs of people with disabilities. Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled (“BCID”) and the Center for the Independence of the Disabled, New York (“CIDNY”), two non-profi

City of New York v Exxon Mobil Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 25011) [*1] City of New York v Exxon Mobil Corp. 2025 NY Slip Op 25011 Decided on January 14, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Patel, J. Published b

City of New York v Exxon Mobil Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 25011) [*1] City of New York v Exxon Mobil Corp. 2025 NY Slip Op 25011 Decided on January 14, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Patel, J. Published b

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: This case—filed shortly after Hurricane Irene in 2011—raises the question of whether the City of New York’s emergency preparedness plans adequately address the needs of people with disabilities. Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled (“BCID”) and the Center for the Independence of the Disabled, New York (“CIDNY”), two no

688 F.Supp.2d 317 (2010) Harbans KAUR, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION (A.K.A. Harlem Hospital), Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 6175(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2010. *321 Walker Green Harman, Jr., The Harman Firm PC, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.