Cases

THIRD DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., DOYLE, P. J., and HODGES, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. A

517 S.W.2d 361 (1974) W. W. HARRIS et al., Appellants, v. PHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 12172. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin. December 4, 1974. Rehearing Denied January 8, 1975. *362 John W. Harris, Austin, for appellants. John W. Stayton, Stayton, Maloney, Hearne, Babb & Cowden,

949 So.2d 916 (2006) HARRIS MORAN SEED COMPANY, INC. v. Edward A. PHILLIPS, individually, and Eddie Phillips, individually, and Edward A. Phillips and Eddie Phillips d/b/a Phillips Tomato Farms Edward A. Phillips, individually, and Eddie Phillips, individually, and Edward A. Phillips and Eddie Phillips d/b/a Phillips Tomato Farms v. Harris Moran Seed Company, Inc. 2040746. Court of Civil Ap

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Linda Kay Jones Phillips sued Edgar E. Harris and other property owners, seeking to have the trial court determine the ownership of minerals found within 160 acres of real property.1 The defendant property owners moved for a summary judgment, arguing that the deed under which both sides claimed their interests unambiguously reserved the minerals at issue for them. In her response to the motion, Phillips presented affidavit testimony f

OPIÑION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice A jury convicted appellant, Joseph Jamal Phillips, of the third-degree felony offense of evading arrest with a motor vehicle and, .after appellant pleaded true to the allegations in two enhancement paragraphs, assessed his punishment at fifty years’ confinement,1 In three issues, appellant contends that (1) the State failed to present sufficien

7 F.3d 241 Phillipsv.Harris NO. 92-8036 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Oct 07, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ga.; Appealing after remand 908 F.2d 979 2 AFFIRMED.

Opinion FYBEL, J. INTRODUCTION Kimberly Kirchmeyer (the Director), as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California (the Medical Board), launched an investigation of *1398 Geoffrey Phillips, M.D., a licensed psychiatrist, based on a complaint

PERRY, Judge. *183Defendant, Antonio Merquis Harris ("Defendant"), appeals his conviction for armed robbery, a violation of La.R.S. 14:64 ; possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, a violation of La.R.S. 14:95.1 ; attempted second degree murder, two counts, violations of La.R.S. 14:27 and 14:30.1 ; intimidating a witness, a violation of L

PERRY, Judge. *183Defendant, Antonio Merquis Harris ("Defendant"), appeals his conviction for armed robbery, a violation of La.R.S. 14:64 ; possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, a violation of La.R.S. 14:95.1 ; attempted second degree murder, two counts, violations of La.R.S. 14:27 and 14:30.1 ; intimidating a witness, a violation of L

*238Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Aaron Hayes appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for ap

908 F.2d 979 Phillipsv.Harris NO. 88-8911 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUN 21, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ga. 2 REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART.

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Timothy Scott Harris ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment entered upon his convictions for identity theft and having attained the status of a habitual felon. Defendant argues the trial court erred by denying his request for an instruction on the lesser-included offense of attempted identity theft. After review, we find no error. I. Factual and Procedural History

GRAEFF, J. This appeal involves Baltimore City’s Gun Offender Registration Act (the “Act” or “GORA”), a local ordinance that requires persons convicted of delineated gun offenses to register with the Police Commissioner of Baltimore City. Balt. City Code, art. 19, §§ 60-1(d)(1), 60-(f), 60-3(a)1 Appellee, Adrian Phillips, a convicted gun offender, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City

*1485Justice THOMAS, concurring. I join the opinion of the Court because it correctly applies our precedents under the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 52 U.S.C. § 10301 et seq . I writ

ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. Plaintiff, Sonja M. Phillips (“Ms. Phillips”), requests judicial review of the decision of Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”), denying Ms. Phillips’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision is AFF

Taylor, Bankruptcy Judge: INTRODUCTION Appellants, Tammy R. Phillips and Tammy R. Phillips, a Professional Corporation (jointly, "Creditors"), obtained an $8,250 judgment against debtor, Kevan Gilman. Under California law, they were entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees in obtaining and collecting this amount, and the state court awar

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge Gary Phillips appeals the Mississippi County Circuit Court's denial of his motion to set aside summary judgment in favor of DeLage Landen Financial Services ("DeLage"). On appeal, Phillips argues that (1) he was entitled to relief pursuant to Rules 55 and 60 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure ; (2) the circuit court lacked jurisdiction; and (3) the city of Blytheville's ("the city's") original answer deny

JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS liDan Freeman appeals the trial court’s November 24, 2015 judgment, rendered after a jury verdict in favor of defendants/appellees Union Carbide Corporation (“Union Carbide”) and Montello, Inc. *440(“Montello”), dismissing all claims against appellees, with prejudice. For the reasons that follow, we convert the appeal to

MEMORANDUM OPINION Roger L. Gregory, United States Circuit Judge Circuit Judge Roger L. Gregory wrote the majority opinion, in which District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr., joined and filed a separate concurrence. District Judge William L. Osteen, Jr., joined in part and filed a dissent as to Part II.A.2: “[T]he Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment ... desired to place clear limits on the S