Cases

Appellate Case: 22-1098 Document: 010110810667 Date Filed: 02/09/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 9, 2023

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Supplemental Class Action Complaint for Violation of ERISA. Defendants Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan”) and Morgan Asset Management (“MAM”) filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 10, 2009. Also on April 10

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff Sharon Harrison, an employee of Defendant the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, filed suit alleging the Defendant' subjected the Plaintiff to a hostile work environment and retaliated against the Plaintiff for engaging in protected ac

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ZYNC, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2025-0284-JTL PORSCHE INVESTMENTS MANAGEMENT, S.A., PORSCHE DIGITAL, INC., CHRISTIAN KNÖRLE, and ULRICH THIEM, Defendants. OPINION DENYING RULE 12(B)(6) MOTIONS Date Submitted: February 11, 2026 Date Decided: May 29, 2026 Christopher H. Lyons, Jason M. Avellino, ROBBINS GELLER RU

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091545 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091444 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

942 A.2d 59 (2008) 398 N.J. Super. 361 HARRISON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony J. DeROSE, Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Town of Harrison and Planning Board of the Town of Harrison, Third-Party Defendants-ReSpondents. Harrison Redevelopment Agency, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony J. DeRose, Defendant-Appellant, and Office of the Public Defender

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN JACOBS, ALAN JACOBS, THE ) BERNARD B. JACOBS AND SARA JACOBS ) FAMILY TRUST, JEAN-LOUIS VELAISE, ) DALE KUTNICK, TOREN KUTNICK, ) EDWARD B. ROBERTS, JOHN DENNIS, ) SHLOMO BAKHASH, and JOAN RUBIN, ) ) Plaintiffs, )

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0186p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TANIKA PARKER and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN SEAVITT, on behalf of himself ) and all other similarly-situated ) stockholders of N-ABLE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0326-JTL ) N-ABLE, INC., ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., a ) Delaware corporation, and SCILEX ) PHARMACEUTICALS INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0210-PAF )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOE I; DOE II; IVY HE; DOE III; No. 15-16909 DOE IV; DOE V; DOE VI; CHARLES LEE; ROE VII; ROE VIII; D.C. No. 5:11-cv- LIU GUIFU; DOE IX; WEIYU 02449-EJD WANG, and those individuals similarly situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; JOHN CHAMBERS; FREDY CHEUNG, AKA Zhang Sihua; DOES, 1-

ACCEPTED 01-14-00906-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/20/2015 7:28:25 PM

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 14-0293 444444444444 JASON R. SEARCY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE EXEMPT ASSETS TRUST, PETITIONER, v. PAREX RESOURCES, INC., RESPONDENT -consolidated with- 44444444

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge THIS MATTER came on for trial on January 9, 2018, before the Court, sitting without a jury. Seattle Times Company ("Seattle Times") was represented by Jeff Kray and Jessica Ferrell of Marten Law PLLC. LeatherCare, Inc. ("LeatherCare"), Steven Ritt, and the marital community composed of Steven Ritt and Laurie Rosen-Ritt were represented by Jo Flannery and Kristin Meier of Ryan, Swanson &a;