Cases

OPINION Chief Justice SAYLOR. We accepted certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to address whether the primary term of an oil-and-gas lease should be equitably extended by the courts, where the lessor has pursued an unsuccessful lawsuit challenging the validity of the lease. The

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/22/2020 09:07 AM CDT - 837 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 28 Nebraska Appellate Reports HARRISON v. HARRISON Cite as 28 Neb. App. 837 Cantrell R. Harrison,

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, and Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion filed November 23, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00125-CV TARGET CORPORATION, Appellant V. D&H PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This is the final case in a series of cases seeking, damages against the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) and individual officers for allegedly searching private homes without probable cause.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S.H., a minor child, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 14-1317 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This is the final case in a series of cases seeking damages against the

FILED May 16, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE VEREIT REAL ESTATE, LP, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 22-0402 FILED 4-11-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2020-016464 The Ho

Rel: March 6, 2026 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,

In this appeal, K.D.H., the mother, challenges the custody, visitation, child-support, and attorney-fee provisions of a judgment divorcing her from T.L.H. III, the father. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. Background In March 2006, the father filed a complaint seeking a divorce from the mother on the ground of incompatibility. He asserted that they had married in 1998; that they had three children, born on September 22, 1999, March 11, 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. No. 25-00187 (EGS) DALONTE HARRISON, Defendant. MEMORNDUM OPINION On July 14, 2025, the Court held a hearing (“July 14, 2025 Hearing” or “Hearing”) on Defendant Dalonte Harrison’s (“Mr. Harrison”) Motion for Reconsideration and Memorandum in Sup

Appellate Case: 23-6028 Document: 80-1 Date Filed: 08/26/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH August 26, 2025 U

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, Senior District Judge This lawsuit was commenced by Dr. John Doe and Dr. Doe’s limited liability company (“the plaintiffs”) to recover damages and secure declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Practitioner Data Bank, and three of

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART [113] PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S CONVERSION CLAIM AND FRAI’S UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS DAVID NUFFER, District Judge. This case is a dispute between a former owner of physical fitness clubs and one of its billing services providers regarding the parties’ obligations to each other

Opinion issued June 23, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00723-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF H.D.D.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Re: ECF Nos. 121, 133, 134 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1055 II. Procedural History.. .1056 III. Jurisdiction... 1056 IV. Facts... 1056 A. Arrest a

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Corizon Health, Sancho, and Orr. ECF No. 46. I. FACTS The Court accepts the following allegations as true for the purpose of resolving this motion. Cahill v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 336, 337-

Chambers v. Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp., 2017 NCBC 22. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF GUILFORD 12 CVS 6126 CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERS, on ) behalf of himself and all others) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00715-CV IN THE INTEREST OF H.P.J., A CHILD On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-27477 MEMORANDUM OPINION Gregory Thomas Josefsberg (“Father

BRYANT, Judge. *8 Where the sole representative in a class action lacked a genuine personal interest in the outcome of the case and the unifying interests of the class was not temporary or *866 unl

MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Deputy Sharkey’s Motion to Dismiss No. II: Dismissal of Fourteenth Amendment Substantive Due Process Claim, filed January 16, 2013 (Doc. 53)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff J.H., on behalf of her d