Cases

581 N.W.2d 602 (1998) Donna Lou SHEETS, Appellant, v. RITT, RITT & RITT, INC., Appellee. No. 96-1981. Supreme Court of Iowa. July 1, 1998. Rehearing Denied August 11, 1998. *603 David S. Wiggins of Wiggins, Anderson & Conger, P.C., West Des Moines, for appellant. John A. Pabst of Pabst Law Firm, Al

486 F.Supp.2d 496 (2007) SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY and Sentry Insurance a Mutual Company, Plaintiffs, v. LBL SKYSYSTEMS (U.S.A), INC., St. Paul Guarantee Insurance Company, Solera Construction, Inc., DCM Erectors, Inc., Ernst & Young, Inc., Raymond Chabot Inc., Linda Angello as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor, Andrew W. Eristoff as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Laurentian B

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. This case involves a federal takings claim arising from the City of Rittman’s operation of water wells that allegedly caused damage to plaintiffs. In our initial review of the district court’s judgment, we requested that the Supreme Court of Ohio answer an important question of first impression involving a proper

OPINION CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge: Reynaldo Medrano Ayala appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. *1088 § 2254. Ayala was convicted of triple homicide in 1988, and he is currently on death row in California. He a

JACKSON, Justice. In this case we consider whether the North Carolina Utilities Commission (“the Commission”) erred by approving certain adjustments made by Dominion North Carolina Power (“Dominion”) to a study of the costs of providing retail electric service to a large industrial customer. In addition, we consider whether the order of the *432Commission, which autho

People v Lee (2020 NY Slip Op 07828) People v Lee 2020 NY Slip Op 07828 Decided on December 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431

People v Salone (2020 NY Slip Op 06903) People v Salone 2020 NY Slip Op 06903 Decided on November 20, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

364 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2005) In re XCEL ENERGY, INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Shareholder Derivative Action Edith Gottlieb v. Xcel Energy, Inc., et al. MDL No. 1511, No. 02-2677 (DSD/FLN), No. CIV.A. 02-2931. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 1, 2005. Guri Ademi, Not Admitted, for Max Bruckner, S

People v Santiago (2023 NY Slip Op 04035) People v Santiago 2023 NY Slip Op 04035 Decided on July 28, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Frey (2019 NY Slip Op 09150) People v Frey 2019 NY Slip Op 09150 Decided on December 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

Carlson v Manning (2022 NY Slip Op 04848) Carlson v Manning 2022 NY Slip Op 04848 Decided on August 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

People v Richards (2019 NY Slip Op 08031) People v Richards 2019 NY Slip Op 08031 Decided on November 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

OPINION COOK, Circuit Judge. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) regulates employer-administered retirement plans. To safeguard employees’ retirement assets, ERISA requires plan fiduciaries to, among other things, manage plan assets prudently and diversify investments “so as to minimize the risk of large losses.” 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1).

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. In this post-divorce modification suit affecting the parent-child relationship, appellant, Marca Mauldin, appeals the trial court’s final order awarding the paternal grandparents, appellees Jerry and Janet Clements, sole managing conservatorship of her two children, C.T.M. and H.T.M. In five issues, Marca argues that: (1)

574 F.3d 822 (2009) David HOLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Charles Libal, and Demetrius Ritt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-3505. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 10, 2009. Decided July 31, 2009. *825 Robert E. Barnes, Daniel Treuden (argued), The Bernhoft Law Firm,

51 S.W.3d 275 (2001) TXU ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, et al., Appellees. No. 00-0936. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued January 31, 2001. Decided June 6, 2001. Rehearing Overruled August 30, 2001. *276 Roy Q. Minton, Minton Burton Foster & Collins,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WISTRICH, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Before the court is defendant TRW, Inc.’s motion for a protective order regarding 29 inadvertently produced privileged documents.1 Specifically, defendant asks the court to direct plaintiff United States, its counsel, and counsel for r

ACCEPTED 03-14-00340-CV

552 F.3d 1062 (2009) David ENG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve COOLEY, District Attorney; Steven Sowders, Head Deputy District Attorney; Curt Livesay, former Chief Deputy District Attorney; Anthony Patchett, former Special Assistant to the District Attorney; and Curtis A. Hazell, Assistant District Attorney; in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-56055. United States Court of Appea

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction After receiving substantial discovery, both before and after abandoning an attempt to enjoin a tender offer and second-step merger between a corporation and an arm’s-length purchaser, the plaintiffs in this case filed a second amended complaint (the “Complaint”).1 The defendants have moved to dismiss the