Cases

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

952 So.2d 1197 (2006) BROWN v. HARTFORD No. 2D05-3797 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District November 3, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Dismissed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 27, 2014) [Dkt. ## 27, 29] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Thia Jai Brown (“plaintiff’ or “Brown”) brings this case against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“defendant” or “Hartford”), challenging the termination of her benefits under a Long Term Disability (“LTD”) insurance policy. See Compl. [Dkt

*144MEMORANDUM*** Dorothy Anne Brown appeals the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of her lawsuit against Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, her homeowners’ insurance carrier, for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The district court found that Hartford had no duty to defend or indemnify Brown in a bankruptcy adv

PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Dodson v. Persell, 390 So.2d 704 (Fla.1980). DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. *71Plaintiff-appellant Linneth A. Brown-Scott appeals from the January 31, 2001 grant of summary judgment for the Hartford Board of Education on Brown-Scott’s claim of retaliation in violation of the First Ame

ANNA J. BROWN, United States Senior District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Stephanie S. Vaughn's Motion (# 49) for Summary Judgment, Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Cross-Motion (# 53) for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's Motion (# 64) to Strike the Declaration (# 63) of Russell S. Buhite in Support of Defendant's Reply. The Court concludes the record is sufficiently developed, and,

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The current dispute arises out of an accident on March 25, 2005, in Collierville, Tennessee, where the driver of a 1990 Mack MR6 truck with an attached tree spade allegedly disregarded a red light and struck the driver’s side of DeShon Ewan’s car, causing her severe injuries. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartfo

606 So.2d 122 (1992) Helen BROWN and Eyvonne Ellis v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY and Lisa Stubbs. No. 89-CA-628. Supreme Court of Mississippi. August 31, 1992. *123 Mark W. Davis, Davis & Emil, Gulfport, for appellant. Lisa P. Dodson, Hopkins Dodson Wyatt & Crawley, Gulfport, for appellees. Before DAN M.

593 So.2d 1376 (1992) Sue Rae Sherman BROWN, et al., v. HARTFORD LIFE COMPANIES, et al. No. 91-CA-443. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. January 31, 1992. Walter F. Marcus, III, Lemle & Kelleher, New Orleans, for defendants, appellants. Maury A. Herman, John B. Loweb, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, New Orleans, for plaintiffs, appellees.

ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company (“Plaintiff’) brings this subrogation action against Defendant Kraus USA, Inc. (“Defendant”) seeking to recover costs it paid on behalf of its insured Susan Grandmaison (the “Ms. Grandmaison”) associated with damage to her home as a result of a water leak.

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment by defendant First Mercury Insurance Company (“First Mercury”) (DE 110); plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company. _ (“Harleys-ville”) (DE 111); defendant Assurance Company of America (“Assurance”) (DE 117); and defendant First Financial Insurance Company (“First Financial”) (DE 126). Also befo

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

Per Curiam: *114In this interlocutory appeal, we are called upon to address claims of First Amendment retaliation and violations of Connecticut state law, and defenses of qualified immunity and state sovereign immunity. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider the qualified immunity defense at this time-when we must accept plaintiff's

Cuyahoga App. No. 93291, 2010-Ohio-2346. On motion for immediate stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied as moot. Brown, C.J., and Cupp, J., dissent.

Opinion LIU, J. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford) issued a commercial general liability policy to Swift Distribution, Inc., doing business as Ultimate Support Systems (Ultimate), that covered “personal and advertising injury.” This term included claims arising from “[ojral, written, or electronic publication of material that slanders or libels a p

652 F.Supp.2d 220 (2009) John MILLER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-943 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 6, 2009. *224 William G. Madsen, Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau, LLC, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff. Gregory A. Brown, Wiggin & Dana, New Hav