Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hartman v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company”
691 F.Supp.2d 946 (2010) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 06-110-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. March 8, 2010. *947 Aaron
07-17-00458CV ACCEPTED SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/23/2018 4:00 PM Vivian Long, Clerk APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS
Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.public domain
JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, James L. Hartman, filed this action against numerous defendants involved in mining, manufacturing, processing, selling, and/or distributing asbestos products. The complaint, filed in the circuit court of Madison County on August 10, 1988, contained counts of negli
Jones v. National Council of Young Men's Christian Associations of the United States of Americapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiffs James Jones, Nicole Steels, Kavon Ward, and Iona Toles have filed this suit on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated employees of the National Council of Young Men’s Christian Associations of the United States of America (the ‘Y”), alleging claims of race discrimination and retaliation against the Y and
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Wardpublic domain
470 U.S. 869 (1985) METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. WARD ET AL. No. 83-1274. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 1984 Decided March 26, 1985 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA *870 Matthew J. Zinn argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Steven Reed.
Catchings v. Hartmanpublic domain
Appellant's decedent brought an action of slander against appellee, but before the cause could be brought to trial the plaintiff died. Appellant, as administratrix of the estate of the plaintiff, sought to prosecute the cause under section 1714, Code 1930, which provides as follows: "When either of the parties to any personal action shall die before final judgment, the executor or administrator of such deceased party may prosecute or defend such action, and the court shall render judgment for
Federal Deposit Insurance v. British-American Corp.public domain
755 F.Supp. 1314 (1991) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Receiver of Western National Bank of Lovell, Wyoming, and Gerald L. Bass, Receiver pendente lite of Fort Lincoln Life Insurance Company and Fort Lincoln Assurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. BRITISH-AMERICAN CORPORATION, (a North Carolina corporation, the surviving corporation of the merger of British-American International Corporation a Florida corporation, and British-American Corporati
Schoen v. American National Insurancepublic domain
This is an action on an insurance policy for disability benefits (Count 1) and to recover premiums paid (Count 2) after commencement of disability. Plaintiff had a verdict on both counts, for the full amount claimed but later entered a remittitur to cover the six months waiting period of the policy and certain items of interest. The court sustained defendant's motion for new trial on the grounds that it should have directed a verdict for defendant and because of error in plaintiff's instructi
La Quay v. Union Fidelity Life Insurancepublic domain
MOORE, Judge. The appellant, Ray La Quay, is the named beneficiary on a life insurance policy issued by the appellee, Union Fidelity Insurance company, to his deceased spouse. La Quay appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of Union Fidelity- Patricia La Quay, appellant’s deceased spouse, died on May 2, 1975, the same day on which the insurance policy was issued. Union Fidelity contends t
316 Ga. 44 FINAL COPY S22A1060, S22X1061. TAYLOR v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. et al.; and vice versa. WARREN, Justice. This appeal and cross-appeal stem from the sexual assault of a 15-year-old girl, Tia McGee (whose interests are represented by Jo- Ann Taylor, the executor of her estate), while McGee was living in a behavioral health facility that was operated by the Devereux Foundation (“Devereux”).1 The sexual assault was perpetrated by Jimmy Sing
Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.public domain
210 F.Supp.2d 330 (2002) Kyle H. LITTLE, Julie Anna Perez, John Rivera, Marta Hogan, Gilbert Muro, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Nos. 00 Civ. 3609(SAS), 00 Civ. 3612(SAS), 00 Civ. 3616(SAS), 00 Civ. 5771(SAS), 00 Civ. 5774(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 22, 2002. *331
Affirmed and Opinion Filed August 15, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01727-CV CLUB VISTA DEVELOPMENT II, INC., Appellant V. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Apartment Association of Metropolitan : Pittsburgh, Inc. : : v. : No. 528 C.D. 2018 : ARGUED: February 11, 2020 The City of Pittsburgh, : Appellant : BEFORE: HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge HONORABLE CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge
73 Ill. App.3d 816 (1979) 392 N.E.2d 295 NATIONAL CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Defendant-Appellee. (ILLINOIS VISION SERVICES, INC., Intervenor-Defendant-Cross-Appellant.) No. 78-703. Illinois Appellate Court First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed June 26, 1979. <
Caviata Attached Homes, LLC v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n (In Re Caviata Attached Homes, LLC)public domain
KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge. *36 Appellant, chapter 11 1 debtor Caviata Attached Homes, LLC (“Caviata”), appeals an order from the bankruptcy court dismissing its second chapter 11 case due to Caviata’s inability to show that an extraordinary change
Brown v. International Service Insurance Companypublic domain
STEPHENSON, Justice. This is an action brought by plaintiff upon defendant’s Scheduled Property Floater Policy of Insurance. The parties submitted this case to the trial court as an agreed case under Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 263. Judgment was rendered that plaintiff recover $250.00, as shown below, and plaintiff appealed. The parties will be referred to here, as they were in the trial court. The agreed
Mindgames, Inc. v. Western Publishing Company, Inc.public domain
POSNER, Chief Judge. This is a diversity suit for breach of contract, governed by Arkansas law because of a choice of law provision in the contract. The plaintiff, MindGames, was formed in March of 1988 by Larry Blackwell to manufacture and sell an adult board game, “Clever Endeavor,” that he had invented. The first games were shipped in the fall of 1989 and by the end of the year, 75 days later, 30,000 had been sold. In Mar
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. Hartmanpublic domain
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge. This action was instituted for the cancellation of three policies of insurance for disability from bodily injury or from sickness, the recovery of the sums theretofore allegedly mistakenly paid the respondent, the restraining of respondent from commencing or proceeding in any further action against complainant upon the policies, and for enjoining the respondent from asserting any claims
National Labor Relations Board v. Pepsi-Cola Distributing Company of Knoxville, Tennessee, Inc.public domain
BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The precise issue before the Board was whether Pepsi-Cola, as a successor employer that adopted the existing collective bargaining contract effective November 1976-No-vember 1977, committed an unfair labor practice under Section 8(a)(5) by its failure to bargain with respect to the payment of the 1977 Christmas bonus. I rec
Laustrup v. Bankers Life Co.public domain
Suit to recover death benefits under an insurance policy for $5,000.00 on the life of Louis Ringe, who died on April 8, 1932. In May, 1945, judgment for plaintiff was appealed by defendant to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. That court adopted an opinion, but later entered an order withdrawing it and transferring the case to the Supreme Court because the amount involved, including interest, places jurisdiction here. The case was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of fac