Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Harvey Erwin Schlesinger”
632 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2009) S.D., individually and as Next Friend of A.J.D., and M.P., individually and as Next Friend of O.J.P., Plaintiffs, v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, George Leidigh, individually and in his official capacity as Principal of The Webster School; Dawn Caronna, individually and in her official capacity; and Debbie Moore, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants. Case No.: 3:09-cv-250-J-20T
Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBHpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 17-15737 Date Filed: 01/26/2021 Page: 1 of 43 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 17-15737 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-0
Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBHpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 17-15737 Date Filed: 01/26/2021 Page: 1 of 44 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 17-15737 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-0
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
In re KBR, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. On September 8, 2010, this Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF No. 99] denying the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Original Motion”) [ECF No. 21]. See In re: KBR Bum Pit Litig., 736 F.Supp.2d 954 (D.Md.2010). The Defendants have now filed a Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subj
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, Georgepublic domain
ROGERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I can join neither the reasoning of the court nor its conclusion that the federal courts lack power to consider the detainees’ petitions. While I agree that Congress intended to withdraw federal jurisdiction through the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (“MCA”), the court’s holding that the MCA is consistent with the Suspension Clause of A
Marshall v. Reinhold Construction, Inc.public domain
441 F.Supp. 685 (1977) Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Petitioner, v. REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent. No. 77-631-Civ-J-T. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. November 17, 1977. *686 Bobbye D. Spears, U. S. Dept. of Labor, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.</
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.public domain
489 U.S. 602 (1989) SKINNER, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. v. RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION ET AL. No. 87-1555. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 2, 1988 Decided March 21, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *605 Attorney General Thornburgh
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Flemingpublic domain
Appellant, an electric utility company, brought this suit to enjoin the City of West University Place and its officials from enforcing its newly-adopted ordinance No. 129 of January 4 of 1938, copy of which is appended hereto as Exhibit A, requiring all telegraph, telephone, electric, and gas companies furnishing their respective services in the City to pay four per cent of their annual gross-receipts from business done therein, as a "street-rental", and conditioning their future right to use
Scholle v. Secretary of Statepublic domain
360 Mich. 1 (1960) 104 N.W.2d 63 SCHOLLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE. Calendar No. 48,580. Supreme Court of Michigan. Petition for writ dismissed June 6, 1960. Rehearing denied July 11, 1960. Notice of appeal filed December 12, 1960. *3 Rothe, Marston, Mazey, Sachs & O'Co
383 F.Supp. 699 (1974) Jeffrey HART, as a minor by his parent and next friend Doris Hart, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICT #21, a body corporate, et al., Defendants. The COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICT #21, By its President and Member, Evelyn J. Aquila, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. John V. LINDSAY, Mayor of the City of New York, et
McConnell v. Federal Election Commissionpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu