Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harvey v. Addison”
Harvey v. Addisonpublic domain
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Bobby Lynn Harvey, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The court held that the app
Susan C. Harvey v. Addison H. Furrow Jr.public domain
Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. Concurrence: ALEXANDER, J. SILVER, J. [¶ 1] Addison H. Furrow Jr. and Karen R. Lane appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Anderson, J.) in favor of Susan C. Harvey on her claims of title by adverse possession and boundary by acquiescence. Harvey cross-appeals from the court’s
CHAISSON, J. On October 8, 2014, Beatrice Addison, individually and in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of Marshall Miller (her brother), filed a petition for damages in the 24th Judicial District Court against *1200Maison Deville Nursing Home of Harvey, LLC, and its insurer. According to the petition, the decedent, Mr. Miller, w
United States v. Addisonpublic domain
DETENTION MEMORANDUM G. Michael Harvey, United States Magistrate Judge This matter comes before the Court upon the application of the United States that Defendant, Anthony Addison, be detained pending trial. Defendant has been charged by Indictment with three counts of Engaging in the Business of Dealing with Firearms without a License, in violation of 1
Addison-Taylor v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER RADER, Circuit Judge. The parties move to “dismiss this case and remand” for further proceedings, in view of this court’s recent decisions in Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002) and O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed.Cir.2002). This court cannot both dismiss and remand an appeal because those are mutually exclusive disposit
Stepak v. Addisonpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge:- I. INTRODUCTION Appellants Barnett Stepak and Roger Mondschein are shareholders of the Southern Company (“Southern”), a major public utility holding company whose subsidiaries provide electricity to consumers in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi. Stepak demanded that the company bring suit to recoup losses allegedly caused by a breach of fiduciary duty by certain directors an
MAIN, Justice. Lt. Harvey Ruffin, a correctional officer at the Bullock Correctional Facility (“the facility”); Sgt. Shelton Patterson, a correctional officer at the facility; Sandra Giles, the deputy warden of the facility; and Kenneth Jones, the warden of the facility (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the petitioners”), the defendants in an action filed by Thomas Donah
State v. Addisonpublic domain
788 So.2d 608 (2001) STATE of Louisiana v. Ted ADDISON. No. 00-KA-1730. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 16, 2001. *611 Kevin V. Boshea, New Orleans, LA, Margaret S. Sollars, Louisiana Appellate Project, Thibodaux, LA, Attorneys for Appellant Ted Addison. Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Rebecca J.
Stepak v. Addisonpublic domain
20 F.3d 398 62 USLW 2662 Barnett STEPAK and Roger Mondschein, derivatively and onbehalf of The Southern Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Edward L. ADDISON; William J. Cabaniss, Jr.; Charles H.Chapman, Jr.; William P. Copenhaver; A.W. Dahlberg; JackEdwards; Joseph M. Farley; H. Allen Franklin; Arthur M.Gignilliat, Jr.; L.G. Hardman, III; Elmer B. Harris;Douglas L. McCrary; Earl D. M
Addison-Taylor v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is an action brought by present and former employees of the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) for the alleged wrongful denial of overtime pay pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207 (1994). Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The matter has been exten
Dean v. Town of Addisonpublic domain
534 S.E.2d 403 (2000) 207 W.Va. 538 William R. DEAN, et al., Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. TOWN OF ADDISON, Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 27463. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted June 13, 2000. Decided July 10, 2000. *404 William W. Talbott, Esq., Webster Springs, West
Addison v. Division Transport, Inc.public domain
In re Ensco Inc.; Smith, Harvey E.;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Alen, 33rd Judicial District *292Court, No. C-93-754; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW95-1184. Denied. WATSON, J., recused.
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed May 9, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00479-CV AIMEE HARVEY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF TALISA PHILLIPS, AMANDA HARVEY, HENRY WILSON, III, AS NEXT FRIEND OF AALEISA PHILLIPS (A MINOR), AND GWENDOLYN WILSON, Appellants V. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC., KINDRED HOS
CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, C.P.A., P.C.public domain
7 P.3d 979 (2000) 198 Ariz. 173 CDT, INC., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ADDISON, ROBERTS & LUDWIG, C.P.A., P.C., an Arizona professional corporation; C. Wesley Addison and Susan U. Philips, husband and wife; D. Jack Roberts and Mary T. Roberts, husband and wife; Christopher William Ludwig and Lore L. Ludwig, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. No. 2 CA-CV 99-0048. <
Fitzgerald v. Addisonpublic domain
BOARDMAN, Judge. This is the second appearance of this case before this court.1 Here appellants appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees, Clarence Addison and Barbara Addison, in a personal injury action on the issue of liability. The case was tried before a jury on the issue of damages. Verdicts were returned in favor of Barbara Addison in the amount of $23,000 and in favor of Cl
Addison v. Hamptonpublic domain
Judgment affirmed. Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
United States v. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy for John Milton Addison, Bankruptpublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Is money obtained from a swindle taxable income to the swindler? We hold that it is. And it makes no difference if the swindle is in the form of a loan and the “lenders” so beguiled that they really believe that they made bona fide loans. * * * Once again the fin
Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Mrs. Cecil Harvey (Betty) Allen, a Feme Solepublic domain
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (Southern Farm) brings this diversity suit for a declaratory judgment that an automobile liability insurance policy it had issued to George Jezisek covering a 1960 model Chevrolet was void and that Southern Farm was relieved of all liability in connection with th
Harvey v. Pealerpublic domain
Champlin, J. Eelator asks for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge of St. Joseph county to vacate an order dismissing an appeal in proceedings to dissolve an attachment. By an act of the Legislature passed in 1851 provision was made that a defendant whose property had been attached might apply to a circuit judge or to a circuit court commissioner for a dissolution. This act did not provide for an a
Harvey v. Gallowaypublic domain
Graves, O. J. The complainant filed his bill herein to obtain a decree of sale of certain premises, being forty acres in the county of St. Joseph, on the ground that’ he held an equitable mortgage on the property, on which there was a large amount due and unpaid. The suit was-defended by Mrs. Galloway, who denied that a.ny debt existed, and after hearing on pleadings and proofs the court' dismissed the bill and complainant appea