Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 914 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 915 Rogers Willard, Inc. ("R W"), appeals from an order of the Baldwin Circuit Court denying its motion for an award of attor

404 B.R. 366 (2009) In re David S. HARWOOD xxx-xx-6244, 8452 CR 2301, Arp, Texas 75750, Debtor. FNFS, Ltd and B & W Finance Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. David S. Harwood, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-61254. Adversary No. 05-6064. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. April 28, 2009. *376 J. Keith Mayo, M

401 B.R. 782 (2009) In re David S. HARWOOD xxx-xx-6244, 8452 CR 2301, Arp, Texas 75750, Debtor. FNFS, Ltd and B & W Finance Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. David S. Harwood, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-61254. Adversary No. 05-6064. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. January 30, 2009. *792 J. Keith Mayo,

NUMBER 13-99-275-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ BAY AREA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD., D/B/A COLUMBIA BAYVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1090 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. JOHN B. HARWOOD, ET AL., Defendants, Appellants.

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _________________________ No. 95-1090 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, ET AL.,

874 F.Supp. 530 (1995) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John B. HARWOOD, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-0229 P. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. January 10, 1995. *531 *532 Amy Tabor, Pawtucket, RI, for plaintiffs. Richard Gonnella, Provid

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Over a century ago, Charles Dudley Warner, a nineteenth-century Connecticut journalist, earned a sliver of immortality by coining the phrase “politics makes strange bedfellows.” This appeal, which forges an improbable alliance among such disparate groups as the National Association of Social Workers, the Rhode Island State Rifle and Revolver Association, the Rhode Island Affiliate of the American Civil

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Netgear Inc. (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging patent infringement against Ruckus Wireless Inc. (“defendant”) on November 19, 2010. (D.I. 1) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 29, 2011, alleging infringement of four patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,812,531 (“the '531 patent”), 6,621,454 (“the '454 patent”

Lowy, J. Prior to 1999, the supply, transportation, and distribution of natural gas to consumers in the Commonwealth were “bundled” together and provided by a State-endorsed monopoly, referred to as a “local distribution company” or “LDC.” The Legislature “unbundled” these components, allowing private companies, referred to as “marketers,” to compete as suppliers of natural gas in

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The Government brought this action against Narco Freedom, Inc. (“Narco Freedom”). The Government alleges that Narco Freedom' is violating 42 U.S.C. *749§ 1320a-7b, the “Anti-Kickback Statute,” by providing below-market housing at Narco Freedom’s “Freedom Houses” only to persons that atten

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, plaintiff ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“Butamax”) filed suit in this district against defendant Gevo, Inc. (“Gevo”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent discloses and claims “a recombinant microorganism having an engineered isobutanol

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the second chapter of a lawsuit challenging the constitutional *37 ity of Maine laws imposing registration and disclosure requirements on entities that finance election-related advocacy. In a recent decision, we rejected claims made by one of the appellants he

892 So.2d 299 (2003) SHIV-RAM, INC., d/b/a Ramada Inn of Anniston v. Linda McCALEB. 1012112. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 30, 2003. Order Overruling Rehearing April 2, 2004. *303 Joe L. Leak and Robert G. Boliek, Jr., and James W. Moss of Friedman, Leak & Bloom, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant. K

ACCEPTED 05-15-00768-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/3/2015 3:25:42 PM LISA MATZ

913 So.2d 1070 (2005) FOX ALARM COMPANY, INC. v. Claude WADSWORTH. Claude Wadsworth v. Fox Alarm Company, Inc. 1020994 and 1021031. Supreme Court of Alabama. January 14, 2005. Opinion Overruling Second Application for Rehearing May 27, 2005. *1072 John S. Plummer and Jason J. Baird of Slaten & O'C

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 209 Lifestar Response of Alabama, Inc., d/b/a Care Ambulance ("Lifestar") appeals from an order entered on July 31, 2003, by Judge Charles Price (1) overruling Lifestar's motion to set aside a default judgment entered in the case styled "Mildred Lemuel,administratrix of the estate of Darnell Eugene

JOHNSTONE, Justice. Petitioners-defendants Sam Mclnnis, Michael Borka, and Tim Shingleton petition this Court for a writ of mandamus to direct the trial judge to vacate her order denying these defendants’ Rule 12(b)(2), Ala. R. Civ. P., motions to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction and to direct her to enter an order granting these motions. We deny mandamus relief to the defendants Mclnnis and Shingleton but grant man

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal invites us to revisit an increasingly important issue in the law of evidence, and one that has confused many courts. Today we clarify the circumstances under which scientifically conducted surveys may be admitted into evidence over a hearsay objection. The case comes to us on appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Sou

857 So.2d 97 (2003) ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., and John Mosley v. Willie D. LARKIN and Vivian M. Larkin. 1012181. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 7, 2003. *99 D. Taylor Flowers and Daniel F. Johnson of Lewis, Brackin, Flowers & Hall, Dothan, for appellants. J. Michael Rediker, Jr., and Patricia C. Diak of Haskell,