Cases

770 F.Supp.2d 452 (2011) David G. HATCHER, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 10-1558 (JA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 14, 2011. *453 Salvador Medina-De-La-Cruz, Salvador Medina-De-La-Cruz Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Ginette L. Milanes, U.S. Attorney's O

LOKEN, Chief Judge, dissenting. Like the district court, I conclude that substantial evidence on the administrative record as a whole supports the Commissioner’s decision to deny Sharon Hatcher’s application for Social Security disability benefits. In my view, it is inherently contrary to our obligation to apply the substantial evidence standard of review to reverse because this case is “remarkably similar” to

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff appeals from a denial of Supplemental Security Income and disability insurance benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). The action is one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner. On August 1, 2006, plaintiff filed an application for Sup

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”) recommending the dismissal of this action. ECF No. 11. Objections have not been filed to the R & R. I. Procedural History On December 17, 2013, plaintiff Santiago Eduardo Padilla-Gómez

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”), recommending that plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos-Rodriguez’s (“plaintiff’) complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed and the decision of defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), be affirmed. ECF No. 20. The R & R was filed

167 F.Supp.2d 1231 (2001) Herbert HATCHER, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 99-4096-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 1, 2001. *1232 Joseph A. Desch, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff. Jackie A. Rapstine, Office of U.S. Atty., Topeka, KS, for Defendant. <

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. On August 10, 2012, plaintiff filed this petition for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied her application for a period of disability and Social Security disability insurance benefits. The answer to the complaint was filed on January 15, 2013 (Docket No. 7). Plaintiff filed a memorand

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff suffered a fall at his home on September 21, 2007 and broke his left wrist. He was operated on four days later. Because of complications, a fracture malformation, another operation was performed and a metal plate surgically inserted weeks later. Plaintiff, who is right handed, filed for social security disability benefits

GANTS, C.J. *323 **543 In 2016, Fred Basile, a property manager, brought a summary process action in the Housing Court in the name of his sole proprietorship, seeking to evict a tenant from a p

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence and upon reconsideration, the Full Commission reverses in part and affirms in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge’. Simone R. Taylor sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) to pay benefits to which she claims entitlement. The district court1 denied her motion. We affirm, although we note that an unexplored avenue of possible relief for Taylor remains available. I. Taylor was born in the United Kingdom in 19

74 F.3d 1230NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Glenda J. BRIM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-2178.

57 F.3d 1065NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Mary Jane BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-1089.

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Pfeiffer and the briefs of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award except with the modification of the Deputy Commissioners Finding of Fact #15 and other general modifications.

POSNER, Chief Judge. Three years ago almost to the day, we reversed the denial of social security disability benefits to Rosie Wilder, Wilder v. Chater, 64 F.3d 335 (7th Cir.1995), holding that the decision of the administrative law judge was unreasonable in light of the record before him. On remand, further evidence was taken, benefits were again denied (by a.

571 S.E.2d 20 (2002) Marion I. HATCHER, Executor of the Estate of Norman Hatcher, Deceased Employee, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORP., Employer, and Kemper Insurance Co., Carrier, Defendants. No. COA01-1342. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 5, 2002. *21 Scudder & Hedrick, by Samuel A. Scudder, Rale

655 N.E.2d 1229 (1995) John M. HATCHER, as Trustee of Whitley County Memorial Hospital Retirement Plan, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Dale HAUPERT and John Mortell, as Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Insurance, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-9412-CV-726. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 25, 1995. Thomas R. Lemon, Michael E. Armey, Lemon, Armey, Hearn &

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT ) OF FAMILY & COMMUNITY ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18249/18259 SERVICES,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3459 ___________ Sharon Hatcher, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the E

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge WILLIAMS Joined. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Ronda S. Craig appeals from a judgment of the district court upholding the determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that she was inel