Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM. Mario Hawkins appeals from a sentence and judgment of two counts of sodomy in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Warren Pumps, LLC (“Warren Pumps”), Crane Company (“Crane”) and Westinghouse Company (n/k/a CBS Corporation)(‘Westinghouse”)[ECF Nos. 105, 108 and 109]. For reasons outlined below, the court has determined to grant the motions.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge. Defendant Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (“Foster Wheeler”) has moved for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs. (Doc. 229). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Pl

MARK P. PAINTER, Judge. I Facts and Introduction This opinion consolidates several cases in which defendants, licensed street peddlers, were charged with “selling or offering for sale tickets to a sporting-type event at greater than face value within twenty feet of a crosswalk” in violation of Cincinnati Municipal Code (“C.M.C.”) 839-ll(e). This opinion will address in order the following

SUMMARY ORDER Hawkins, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Siragusa, J.), following the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Wegmans. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts. Hawkins has filed three documents in support of his appeal. The first is attached to Hawkins’s notice of appeal and specifica

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 11:05:49 2019.01.23 Certiorari Granted, December 3, 2018, No. S-1-SC-37343 IN THE COUR

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

VIGIL, Judge. {1} This is a condemnation case brought by the City of Albuquerque (City) to acquire a thirty-foot wide strip of land to build a road on property operated as a freight truck terminal by tenants. The issues are (1) whether lease payments from a tenant may be considered in computing just compensation when the City's precondemnation actions caused the tenant not to renew its

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0864 ══════════ City of San Antonio, Petitioner, v. Nadine Realme, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated April 2, 1998, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel them to disclose video surveillance tapes pursuant to CPLR 3101 (i), and denied their cross motion to compel the injured plaintiff to appear for a further examination before trial and for a protective

58 F.Supp.2d 1013 (1999) James LARSON, Plaintiff, v. FARMERS COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR OF BUFFALO CENTER, IOWA, an Iowa cooperative, and Farmers Co-operative Company, Ledyard, Iowa, an Iowa cooperative, Defendants. No. C 96-3138-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 5, 1999. David L. May, Hawkins & Norris, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintif

OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Curran, J. Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review and annul the February 14, 2011 decision and order of the New York Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) relating to PERB case Nos. C-5672, E-2429, and C-5878 (Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm’rs, Local 1 AFSA [Brooklyn Excelsior Charter School], 44 PERB ¶ 3001 [2011]). Petitio

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. The Fond du Luth Casino in downtown Duluth, Minnesota opened in 1986 as a joint venture between the City of Duluth and the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and is today a profitable tourist attraction owned and operated by the Band. Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) in 1988 which changed the legal framework underlying th

Callahan, J. (dissenting). I respectfully disagree and vote to affirm for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Erie County (see, Matter of Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. Dev. Corp., 148 Misc 2d 657). Under the Federal Freedom of Information Act or FOIA (5 USC § 552), a FOIA agency is defined as a "Government controlled corporation” (5 USC § 552 [f]). The New York statute (Public Officers Law art 6) was patterned after the

OPINION OF THE COURT Jerome C. Gorski, J. This controversy is before this court pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Public Officers Law § 84, wherein petitioner, The Buffalo News (News), is seeking review of an earlier "administrative” decision of the Buffalo Economic Development Corporation (BEDC). The BEDC denied petitioner access *658to information with

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judges GOULD and TALLMAN join, dissenting: Seattle Center is an astonishing cultural achievement. Just minutes from downtown on foot or by monorail, it is home to a *1060dizzying array of entertainment venues, sporting events, festivals, educational and community programs, restaurants, museums

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL JAMES BERGER, a single  man also known as Magic Mike, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE; VIRGINIA No. 05-35752 ANDERSON, Director of Seattle Center; MICHAEL ANDERSON,  D.C. No. CV-03-03238-JLR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TOWNES, District Judge. Substitute plaintiff Cecil Lewis, (“Mr. Lewis” or “plaintiff’), brings this action as administrator of the estate of former-plaintiff Stephanie Lewis, (“Lewis”), his deceased wife. Plaintiff alleges that the New York City Transit Authority (“the Transit Authority”) discriminated against Lewis, formerly a Transit Authority bus driver, on account of her r

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter