Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hawkins v. Jefferson Davis Parish”
Hawkins v. Willow Inc.public domain
MARC E, JOHNSON, Judge. | fiPlaintiffs/Appellants, Keela Hawkins, et al., appeal the sustaining of a declinato-ry exception of lack of jurisdiction, the granting of a motion .to strike and the denial of a motion for new trial-in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Willow Incorporated (hereinafter referred to .as “Willow, Inc.”) and National Home Insurance Company (A Risk Retention Group) (hereinafter referred to as “NHIC
Hawkins v. Josephpublic domain
AMY, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Hawkins v. City of Jennings, 97-1291 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), 709 So.2d 292, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part. Costs of this appeal are assigned fifty percent to the plaintiff and fifty percent to the defendants in the above-cited consolidated opinion. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
Hawkins v. Josephpublic domain
AMY, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Hawkins v. City of Jennings, 97-1291 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), 709 So.2d 292, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part. Costs of this appeal are assigned fifty percent to the plaintiff and fifty percent to the defendants in the above-cited consolidated opinion.
Hawkins v. City of Jennings Police Departmentpublic domain
AMY, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated ease of Hawkins v. City of Jennings, 97-1291 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), 709 So.2d 292, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part. Costs of this appeal are assigned fifty percent to the plaintiff and fifty percent to the defendants in the above-cited consolidated opinion. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
State v. Hawkinspublic domain
968 So.2d 1082 (2007) STATE of Louisiana v. Irvin HAWKINS. No. 06-KA-739. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. September 25, 2007. *1084 Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Thomas J. Butler, James W. Adair, Assistant District Attorneys, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Parish of Jefferson, Gretna,
In re Jefferson Countypublic domain
Memorandum Opinion (as amended with respect to Footnote 9) THOMAS B. BENNETT, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Overview: The Parties, Positions Taken, Relief Requested, and Outcome This Court is confronted by motions filed by The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Indenture Trustee for holders of warrants (Indenture Trustee) issued by Jefferson County, Alabama (here
In Re Jefferson County, Ala.public domain
469 B.R. 92 (2012) In re JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, a political subdivision of the State of Alabama Debtor. No. 11-05736-TBB. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 4, 2012. *94 Ann E. Acker, Chicago, IL, Laura E. Appleby, New York, NY, Stephen B. Porterfield, Birmingham, AL, James Spiotto, Chicago, IL, fo
Matter of Hawkinspublic domain
224 B.R. 334 (1998) Raymond A. HAWKINS and Brunilda Hawkins, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 97-15883. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana. September 8, 1998. *335 William A. Neilson, New Orleans, LA, R. Travis Douglas, Fort Smith, AR, for Debtor. Stevens E. Moore, Asst. U.S. Attorney, New Orleans, LA, Claude C. Lightfoot, Jr.,
State v. Hawkinspublic domain
In re Hawkins, Emile; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st Judicial District Court, No. CR-3243-96; to the Court of *231Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. CR97-0727, CR97-0726. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Bucklew, Stephen L. v. Hawkins Ash Baptiepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 02-2244, 02-2299 STEPHEN L. BUCKLEW, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. HAWKINS, ASH, BAPTIE & CO., LLP, and HAB, INC., Defendants-Appellants,
Hawkins v. City of Jenningspublic domain
709 So.2d 292 (1998) Emile Joseph HAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF JENNINGS, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-1291. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 6, 1998. Emile Joseph Hawkins, pro se. John Fayne Wilkes, III, Lisa Mayer, Lafayette, for City of Jennings Jailhouse, et al. Andre Joseph Buisson, Jennings, for Jefferson Da
State v. Davispublic domain
11 GRISBAUM, Judge. Ronnie C. Davis, the defendant herein, appeals his conviction of second degree murder (La. R.S. 14:30.1). We remand the matter and affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On January 24, 1994, Linda Robinson, John Hawkins, Shawn Brown, Roy Johnson, and Ms. Robinson’s 12-year-old niece, Cynthia, were at 1348 Myrtle Street, a home rented by Linda Robinson’s siste
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Stephen Bucklew brought this suit in a federal district court in Wisconsin against two affiliated companies that we’ll call “HAB.” The suit charges copyright infringement, fraud, conversion, and violation of RICO. The district judge dismissed all but the copyright claim, which was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for Buck-lew of $660,000, which the
Davis v. Statepublic domain
611 So.2d 906 (1992) Charles Ralph DAVIS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 90-KA-0560. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 17, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1993. *907 Michael Adelman, Adelman & Steiner, Hattiesburg, for appellant. Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., John R. Henry, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. G
People v. Hawkinspublic domain
196 Cal.App.2d 832 (1961) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EUGENE VENCIL HAWKINS, Appellant. Crim. No. 7433. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Four. Nov. 14, 1961. Frank Duncan for Appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Herbert Davis, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. BURKE, P.
Hawkins v. Costonpublic domain
The appeal is from a final decree dismissing complainant's bill. The appellant filed bill against appellee, alleging, among other things, that the parties entered into a contract in writing as to the purchase of lands described on the terms indicated. The consideration was averred to have been $100 cash and the execution of fifty-odd promissory notes of $20 each, payable monthly with interest. It is further averred that appellant paid 52 of said notes, the last date of payment being February
Gainer v. School Board of Jefferson County, Ala.public domain
135 F.Supp. 559 (1955) Ruby Jackson GAINER, Member of Class Represented by William J. Bolden, Plaintiff, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, and J. E. Bryan, Superintendent of Schools of Jefferson County, Alabama, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 5339. United States District Court N. D. Alabama, S. D. November 4, 1955. *560 Cram
Ceylon Co. v. Hawkinspublic domain
The bill challenges the validity of assessment for taxes on the stock of Ceylon Company, a corporation. The alleged assessment is averred to have been made by the board of tax adjusters of Jefferson county, and not pursuant to section 12 of the Revenue Act. A tax of $2,017.81 was assessed against the 977 shares of capital stock in said corporation, and it is alleged that, unless restrained, the tax collector will proceed to levy on said shares and sell the same pursuant to the provisio
McNair v. Davispublic domain
WALKER, Circuit Judge. By his bill in equity against the receiver of the First National Bank of St. Augustine, Fla., the appellee asserted a claim to $35,000 of Liberty bonds, alleged to have been bought for the appellee by that bank before it closed its doors and suspended business on July 24, 1929. The ease was heretofore in this court on an appeal from a decree sustaining a motion to dismiss the bill. For a statement of the
Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. Hewittpublic domain
The bill was filed against the members of the board of revenue of Jefferson county, Ala., to enjoin the issuance of county warrants. Demurrer thereto and motion to dissolve were overruled. The practical phase of the case for the county is well stated by its counsel: "The county of Jefferson, at the time of the sale of the bonds, was in this predicament: The law at that time forbade the sale of the bonds at less than par. The rate of interest authorized by law was such that no pu