Cases

831 So.2d 21 (2002) Sue RYAN and Willard Ryan v. Jim HAYES et al. Karl Franklin Smith, individually and as next friend of William Frank Smith III, a minor v. Jim Hayes et al. Michael Peden and Harold Peden v. Jim Hayes et al. 1001578, 1001630 and 1001631. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 22, 2002. *22 Randa

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge. | j Appellant Michael A. Hayes and appel-lee Sandra L. Otto were divorced in 1998, and the parties had two minor children. Since then, the parties have on numerous occasions been back before the trial court as well as the court of appeals with various controversies, including issues relating to child support. The most recent appeal now before this court relates only to Rule 11 s

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County denied.

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. After a three-day trial, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Lance William Hayes, the appellant, of attempted first-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, first-degree assault, second-degree assault, use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence, and wearing and ca

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-25-00103-CV ICONIC, LLC; REGICON, LLC; RJH I, LLC; RODNEY J. HAYES; AND RYAN J. HAYES, Appellants V. SANGALLI PRIVATE VENTURES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 342nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 342-358422-24 Before Steven

Orme, Judge: ¶1 Plaintiffs Kim and Nancy Hayes appeal the district court's dismissal of their claims against defendant Intermountain GeoEnvironmental Services Inc. (IGES). IGES is one of three defendants against whom the Hayeses brought suit. In response to a motion brought by IGES pursuant to rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, the district court entered an order characte

ORDER LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge. AND NOW, this 28th day of June 2012, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants Kenneth Easterday and Patricia Easterday for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47), Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50), Exhibits to Response to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 52), Reply of' Defendants Kennet

UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Thomas J. HAYES, Midshipman U.S. Navy, Appellee No. 11-5003 Crim. App. No. 201000366 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued November 2, 2011 Decided February 13, 2012 BAKER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in

Chief Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant brings this appeal from a United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) decision affirming his conviction for, among other things, violation of Article 92(3), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892(3) (2006), dereliction of duty in that he willfully failed to refrain

344 S.W.3d 689 (2009) 2009 Ark. App. 654 Michael A. HAYES, Appellant, v. Sandra L. OTTO, Appellee. No. CA 08-1486. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. October 7, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 18, 2009. *690 Michael A. Hayes, pro se appellant. Dodds, Kidd & Ryan, by: David W. Kamps,

BERGER, Justice: This is an interlocutory appeal from entry, by the Court of Chancery, of a preliminary injunction halting consummation of a stock purchase agreement under which Vi-vendi, S.A. would have divested itself of its controlling interest in Activision Blizzard, Inc. Appellee, an Activision stockholder, convinced the trial court that the company’s charter requires that a majority of the public stockholders vote in f

Mr. Justice Dove delivered the opinion of the court.

MEMORANDUM * Joseph Hayes appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Hayes contends that he was convicted of robbery and murder in violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. We AFFIRM. Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), a federal court cannot grant an application for a writ of habeas c

HASELTON, P. J. The state appeals from an order allowing suppression of evidence of possession of a controlled substance seized during a search of defendant’s home. ORS 138.060(l)(c). The state argues that (1) the officers’ approach to the back door of the residence was not a trespass under the analysis of State v. Somfleth, 168 Or App 414, 8 P3d 221 (2000); and (2) even if the police approached and entered defendant’s

780 N.E.2d 1098 (2002) 201 Ill.2d 529 269 Ill.Dec. 374 Michael LYONS et al., Appellants, v. George H. RYAN et al., Appellees. No. 92503. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 19, 2002. *1100 Robert S. Atkins, Jay Stewart, Terrance Norton, Chicago, for appellants. James R. Thom

207 F.Supp.2d 944 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jason Anthony HAYES, Defendant. No. CRIM.01-155. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. June 5, 2002. *945 Debra L. Scorpiniti, U.S. Atty., Des Moines, IA, for U.S. Thomas D. Hanson, Hanson, Bjork & Russell LLP, Des Moines, IA, B. John

72 F.Supp.2d 635 (1999) Albert MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. Robert HAYES, D.O., Defendant. No. 1:98CV00180. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. November 1, 1999. *636 Michael A. Kernbach, Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, Falls Church, VA, Karel Brown Ryan, Ryan Law Firm, P.C., Tazewell, V

756 N.E.2d 396 (2001) 324 Ill. App.3d 1094 258 Ill.Dec. 414 Michael LYONS, a State of Illinois taxpayer, and the Better Government Association, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of and for the benefit of the State of Illinois, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George H. RYAN, Citizens for Ryan, a State political committee, Scott Fawell, Mark Sniegowski, Mike Chamness, and John Chychula, Defe

768 N.E.2d 899 (2002) Sheila RAY-HAYES, As Parent and Natural Guardian of Amanda K. Ray, Appellant (Plaintiff Below), v. Ryan S. HEINAMANN, Nissan Motor Company, Ltd., and Nissan North America, Inc., Appellees (Defendants Below). No. 89S05-0201-CV-306. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 29, 2002. *900 Thomas C. Doehrman, Indianapolis,