Cases

Landau, J. The plaintiff, Reginald Hayes, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his request for an order directing the defendant, The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, to proceed with a second arbitration pursuant to an uninsured motorist provision contained in the insurance policy issued to him by the defendant. We reverse the judgment of the trial court. The parties have stipulated to the foll

389 N.W.2d 257 (1986) The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent, v. HAYES CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellants. No. C9-86-141. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. June 24, 1986. *258 M.T. Fabyanske, David D. Hammargren, Fabyanske, Svoboda and Westra, P.A., St. Paul, for respondent. Jon G. Sarff, Elmquist and Sarff, P.A., Minneapolis

216 S.W.3d 302 (2007) THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al. v. MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 6, 2006 Session. March 7, 2007. *303 Kenneth S. Schrupp, Nashville, Tennessee, and Linda B. Foster and Paul Owens, Atlanta, Georgia, for the appellants, The Travelers Indemnity

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY § COMPANY, § § No. 420, 2017 Defendant-Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. §

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR., CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by one of the defendants, Arch Insurance Company ("Arch" or "the Defendant"). See Record Document 25. Arch contends that coverage did not exist under policies issued by it to Gilchrist Construction Company, LLC ("Gilchrist") and therefore it also had no duty to defend Gilchrist. See id. For the reasons that follow, the Motion

HOOD, Judge. Plaintiff, Pratt G. Hayes, instituted this action for damages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of an automobile accident. He contends that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the driver of a truck owned by the Tom C. Lofton Construction Company. The suit was instituted against The Travelers Indemnity Company, the liability insurer of the truck. Judgment was rendered

PER CURIAM: Relator J. Michael Hayes appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his False Claims Act (“FCA”) qui tarn action as a sanction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. On appeal, *84Hayes argues that the misstatements in his complaint were not made in bad faith and did not justify the sanction of dismissal. He further argu

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE; CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This action seeks to resolve disputes regarding the coverage due under a comprehensive general liability policy issued to plaintiff County of Stanislaus by the Insurance Company of the Pacific Coast, which was a former entity of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pr

264 F.Supp. 322 (1967) Bennie W. AGEE, Administrator of the Estate of M. Louise Agee, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 65-305. United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma. February 13, 1967. *323 *324 Carl E. Moslander, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plain

KEITH, Justice. These three cases present certified questions from the federal district court in Minnesota requiring us to decide whether the costs of complying with directives is*177sued by state and federal environmental agencies to clean up groundwater contamination caused by pollution are covered under the insureds’ comprehensive general liability insurance polici

TATE, Judge. A tractor owned by Floyd O. Crawford was burned while in the possession of the *675Hendry Corporation. Crawford’s fire insurer, as subrogee, sues Hendry in tort to recover the damages caused by the fire. The trial court held that the tractor loss resulted from the negligence of Hendry’s employee who was operating the tractor at the time. Hendry appeals fr

396 F.2d 57 Bennie W. AGEE, Administrator of the Estate of M. Louise Agee, Deceased, Appellant,v.The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 9441. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. May 29, 1968. Carl E. Moslander, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant. Glenn H. Grubb, Oklaho

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ Nos. 96-1788, 96-1789, 96-1790, 96-1791, 96-1792, 96-1793, 96-1794, 96- 1842 MILLIPORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appell

749 F.Supp. 556 (1990) Reginald F. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, the Travelers Indemnity Company and Robert Lewis Hermann, Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 4447(MEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 7, 1990. Summit, Rovins & Feldesman, New York City (Leonard D. Steinman, of counsel), Hayes, Hume, Petas & Langberg, Los Ang

376 F.Supp. 901 (1973) ALFALFA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a domestic cooperative corporation, Plaintiff, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. John R. HOOPER et al., Third Parties Defendant. Civ. No. 72-753. United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma. November 26, 1973. *90

336 F.Supp.2d 906 (2004) WELLS' DAIRY, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Travelers Insurance Company, and Travelers Property Casualty Corporation, Defendants. No. C01-4097-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. September 23, 2004. *907 Adam S. Ryan, Arthur F. Foerster, Mary Rose

307 F.3d 1127 DEWITT CONSTRUCTION INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; Travelers Property Casualty Corporation; Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Defendants-Appellees,v.Opus Northwest LLC, Third-party-plaintiff.DeWitt Construction Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company; Travelers Property Casualty Corporation; Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Defendants-Appel

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The substantial costs of remediating environmental damage under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., and other environmental laws have pitted businesses against their insurers in fierce disputes over who will bear these costs. That is the case here.

Appeal and cross appeal from an *1212order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Dillon, J.), entered June 17, 2002, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant and the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Wyoming Cou

600 F.3d 819 (2010) Kevin FOX and Melissa Fox, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward HAYES, Michael Guilfoyle, Scott Swearengen, Brad Wachtl, and Will County, Defendants-Appellants, v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation and Essex Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 08-3736. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 9, 2009.