Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Heard v. Publix Supermarkets Inc.”
Heard v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
Affirmed.
Batista v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
993 So.2d 570 (2008) Jose BATISTA, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC. and Specialty Risk Services, Inc, Appellee. No. 1D07-3140. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 22, 2008. *571 William F. Souza of William F. Souza, P.A., North Miami Beach, for Appellant. Mal Steinberg, of Law Offices of Ste
Gilbert v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
790 So.2d 1057 (2001) Caroline GILBERT, Petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., et. al., Respondents. No. SC94998. Supreme Court of Florida. July 12, 2001. Thomas A. Vaughan of Vaughan, Donohoe & Williams, Orlando, FL, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, FL, for Petitioner. Arthur J. England, Jr. and Brenda K. Supple of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, FL, for Re
Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Joseph Safontepublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Appellant, v. JOSEPH SAFONTE, Appellee. Nos. 4D2023-0216 and 4D2023-0815 [June 20, 2024] Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial
Hagopian v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
788 So.2d 1088 (2001) George HAGOPIAN and Cheryl Hagopian, Appellants, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., Appellee. No. 4D99-3301. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 20, 2001. Rehearing Denied August 1, 2001. Roy D. Wasson, Miami, and Law Offices of Rosen, Switkes & Jove, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Shanera Jones v. Publix Supermarket, Inc.public domain
06/07/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 8, 2019 Session SHANERA JONES v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKET, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 16C-2594 Amanda Jane McClendon, Judge ___________________________________
900 F.Supp. 419 (1995) PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO & CLC, a voluntary, unincorporated labor organization, and United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1625, an affiliated labor organization, and others, unnamed persons JOHN DOES, Defendants. No. 94-1891-CIV-T-17C. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Divis
Little v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
234 So.2d 132 (1970) Lena LITTLE and Alfred Little, Appellants, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. No. 69-228. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 17, 1970. *133 John H. Lewis of Meyer, Leben, Fixel & Gaines, Hollywood, for appellants. Dieter K. Gunther of Carey, Dwye
Newalk v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc.public domain
610 So.2d 528 (1992) Barbara NEWALK, Appellant, v. FLORIDA SUPERMARKETS, INC., Appellee. No. 91-3015. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 1, 1992. Rehearing Denied January 26, 1993. *529 Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, Rosen & Switkes, Miami Beach, for appellant. Hicks, Anderson &
Designer's View, Inc. v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.public domain
764 F.Supp. 1473 (1991) DESIGNER'S VIEW, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., a Florida corporation, Darren Williams Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation, William Greenwald and Does I-X, jointly and severally, Defendants. No. 86-2298-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 19, 1991. *1474
Goodwill Industries of Central Florida v. Heardpublic domain
VAN NORTWICK, J. In this workers’ compensation appeal, Goodwill Industries of Central Florida, Professional Business Owners Associations, and Everest National Insurance Company, (employer/carrier), challenge a worker’s compensation order awarding permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. Appellants argue the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in finding that the positions offered to Dellean Heard, claimant and appellee,
Thorpe v. BJ's Rests., Inc.public domain
G. KENDALL SHARP, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes for consideration on Defendant BJ's Restaurants Inc.'s ("BJ's) Dispositive Motion for Final Summary Judgment (the "Motion") (Doc. 16), to which Plaintiffs Elizabeth Thorpe ("E. Thorpe") and John Clark Williams, II ("Williams") (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") filed a response in opposition (Doc. 26) and BJ's replied (Doc. 32). For the reasons that follow, the Mot
Sazerac Co. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION I conducted a bench trial from June 26-30, 2017 on plaintiff Sazerac Company, Inc.’s (“Sazerac”) trademark and trade dress infringement case against Fetzer Vineyards (“Fetzer”), and heard closing argument on August 14, 2017. In the final analysis, this case was not close. Sazerac clai
Int'l Sec. Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Rollandpublic domain
LINDSEY, J. International Security Management Group, Inc. ("ISMG") and Jorge Acuna appeal ("Acuna") from a final judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of William and Lisa Rolland (the "Rollands"). The Rollands cross-appeal the trial court's partial denial of their motion for leave to amend the complaint to add punitive damages against ISMG.1 Because there is a reasonable possibility that the jur
Int'l Sec. Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Rollandpublic domain
LINDSEY, J. International Security Management Group, Inc. ("ISMG") and Jorge Acuna appeal ("Acuna") from a final judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of William and Lisa Rolland (the "Rollands"). The Rollands cross-appeal the trial court's partial denial of their motion for leave to amend the complaint to add punitive damages against ISMG.1 Because there is a reasonable possibility that the jur
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for final disposition after a bench trial that was held on May 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 22 regarding Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief and damages against all Defendants based on Defendants’ alleged violations of Plaintiffs’ real propert
Reed v. American Cellular, Inc.public domain
ORDER JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant American Cellular Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 15.) For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. Background A. Factual History1 Defendant American Cellular, Inc. (“AC
Marshalls of M.A., Inc. v. Witterpublic domain
MOTION FOR REHEARING ROTHENBERG, J.' Marshalls of M.A., Inc. (“Marshalls”) seeks rehearing of this Court’s dismissal of Marshalls’ petition for writ of certiorari, which was based on a finding, that the petition was untimely filed. We grant rehearing and, vacate this Court’s , December 17,2015 order dismissing the petition. We decline to rul
Grimes v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.public domain
SUAREZ, C.J. Patricia Grimes appeals from an adverse final summary judgment as to defendants Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc., the Marguerite M. Larsen Trust, and AFM Group, LLC. We affirm summary judgment as to Family Dollar Store. We reverse summary judgment as to the remaining defendants, as the record contains genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment.
Pro Choice Remediation Inc. A/A/O St. James AME Church of Trustee v. Old Dominion Insurance Companypublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-2393 _____________________________ PRO CHOICE REMEDIATION, INC., a/a/o St. James AME Church of Trustees, Appellant, v. OLD DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County. James J. Goodman, Judge.