⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Heard v. U.S. Crime Prevention, Corp d/b/a Texas Crime Prevention Agency”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2023-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed March 16, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00052-CV __________ AIM MEDIA TEXAS, LLC D/B/A THE ODESSA AMERICAN, Appellant V. CITY OF ODESSA, TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 161st Distr
District Court, E.D. New York · 2018-04-20 · Published · cited 13× · 307 F. Supp. 3d 121
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, United States District Judge Plaintiff John Doe ("plaintiff") brings the instant action against defendants United States Merchant Marine Academy (the "Academy"), James A. Helis, individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of the Academy, the United States Department of Transportation, and the United States of America (collectively, "defendants" or the "government"). Plaintiff claims that defendants improperl
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 59× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 502
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-760 (CKK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 17, 2020) This case concerns detained immigrants’ access
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-02-16 · Published · cited 2× · 163 F. Supp. 3d 157; 2016 WL 613429; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18488
MEMORANDUM Diamond, District Judge Petitioners — twenty-nine Central American women and their thirty-five minor children — were seized by the Department of Homeland Security within minutes of their illegal entry into the United States. Acting pursuant to the Immigration and Naturalization Act, DHS ordered their “expedited removal” after finding that none had a “credible fear” of torture or persecution upon
District Court, D. Arizona · 2017-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 283 F. Supp. 3d 783
Honorable David C. Bury, United States District Judge *787The Court grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds the McKittrick policy is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion and otherwise not in accordance with law in violation of the APA. Therefore, the Court grants summary judgment for Plaintiffs under the
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2020-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00219-CV ___________________________ EL DURANGUENSE FORT WORTH INC. D/B/A EL DURANGUENSE, Appellant V. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tar
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2022-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Jimmy A. Richardson, II, Solicitor for the 15th Judicial Circuit, on behalf of the 15th Circuit Drug Enforcement Unit, Appellant, v. Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-One and 00/100 Dollars ($20,771.00), U.S. Currency and Travis Green, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2020-000092 Appeal from Horry County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28113 Hea
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-05-30 · Published · cited 6× · 311 F. Supp. 3d 187
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge The United States government's networks and computer systems are extremely *193important strategic national assets. Threats to these systems are constantly expanding and evolving. Their security depends on the government's ability to act swiftly against perceived threats and to take preventi
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00121-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/15/2015 9:45:20 PM Pam
D.A.M. v. Barrpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.A.M, et al., Petitioners, v. Case No. 20-cv-1321 (CRC) WILLIAM BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioners in this case are nearly 100 families from
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00098-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 2:02 PM Cause No. 15-24-00098-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________________________ CLERK
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-09-19 · Published · cited 15× · 266 F. Supp. 3d 1
*8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In June of 2016, millions of unsuspecting federal employees sat down at their computers, opened up their email, and received some very disconcerting news.
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 30× · 919 F. Supp. 2d 51; 2013 WL 324035; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11592
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this consolidated action, under the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 461, et seq., the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, et seq., the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq., and
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-02-18 · Published · cited 110× · 709 F.3d 413; 2013 WL 599331
OWEN, Circuit Judge: Appellees John Fluellen Heard, Jr. and Gary Lee Lambert were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States by failing to pay and impeding the IRS’s collection of employment taxes. Heard was also convicted of two counts of tax evasion, one count of bribery of a public official, one count of willfully making and subscribing to a false return, and one co