Cases

05/28/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 2, 2024 Session HEATHER MARIE BAILEY v. DANIEL MICHAEL BAILEY Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Warren County No. 21-DV-9505 L. Craig Johnson, Judge1 ______

Matter of Daniel RR. v Heather RR. (2023 NY Slip Op 06011) Matter of Daniel RR. v Heather RR. 2023 NY Slip Op 06011 Decided on November 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

Peters, P.J. Appeals from a decision and judgment of the Supreme Court (Sherman, J.), entered July 19, 2013 and August 23, 2013 in Tioga County, ordering, among other things, sole legal and primary physical custody of the parties’ children to defendant. Plaintiff (hereinafter the mother) and defendant (hereinafter the father) are the parents of two sons, born in 2002 and 2006. The mother commenced this divor

Peters, P.J. Appeals from a decision and judgment of the Supreme Court (Sherman, J.), entered July 19, 2013 and August 23, 2013 in Tioga County, ordering, among other things, sole legal and primary physical custody of the parties’ children to defendant. Plaintiff (hereinafter the mother) and defendant (hereinafter the father) are the parents of two sons, born in 2002 and 2006. The mother commenced this divor

REVERSE AND RENDER and Opinion Filed November 30, 2018 Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01472-CV HEATHER DOBROTT, Appellant V. JEVIN, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION; AND DANIEL E. PTAK, AN INDIVIDUAL,

Order entered March 7, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01472-CV HEATHER DOBROTT, Appellant V. JEVIN, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION; AND DANIEL E. PTAK, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellees On A

McFADDEN, Judge. The state charged appellants Heather Kimbrough and Melissa Ann Mayfield (“the defendants”), along with two other people, with violation of the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, OCGA § 16-14-letseq. and certain drug offenses. The defendants filed general and special demurrers to the Georgia RICO Act count of the indictment. The tr

*881 PER CURIAM. Andrew Forssell (the father) appeals a nonfinal order granting the verified emergency motion of his former wife, Heather Forssell (the mother), to suspend indefinitely his time-sharing with the parties’ minor children (Case Number 4D15-702). In a separate case, he also appeals a nonfi-n

LAWSON, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham , 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). The district court certified that its decision is in direct c

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, a woman of 25, appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the denial of SSI (Supplemental Security Income) benefits, which are paid to low-income people who are aged, blind, or disabled. The program is administered by the Social Security Administration. The plaintiff claims to be disabled by reason of being mentally retarded (“intellectua

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, March 29, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0296. DANIEL MOSERA v. HEATHER MOSERA. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 2021CV354761 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk'

Rel: August 22, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIA

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered September 21, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment limiting its liability to the damages specified in the parties’ contracts, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff Heather James Jackson, LLC, the owner of an art gallery in Wyoming, facilitated for a client the pur

OPINION MEYER, Justice. This case presents the question of whether Minn.Stat. § 575.05 (2010) authorizes a district court to issue a temporary injunction prohibiting a judgment debtor from transferring or disposing of property that is not presently in the hands of or due to the judgment debtor. The property at issue in this case is the interest of respondent Andrew C. Grossman, the judgment debtor, in a s

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Judy Farris is a Tennessee judicial commissioner. She issued a warrant for Daniel Norfleet's arrest based on an affidavit from his probation officer saying that he had violated his probation. Norfleet went to jail for several months. A state court judge dismissed the warrant on the ground that Tennessee commissioners lack authority to issue such warrants. Norfleet

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered September 21, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment limiting its liability to the damages specified in the parties’ contracts, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff Heather James Jackson, LLC, the owner of an art gallery in Wyoming, facilitated for a client the pur

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, three Phoenix police officers allege that two other officers violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments when, pursuant to a state court order, they obtained DNA samples from the plaintiffs to exclude them as contributors of DNA at a crime scene. The district court dismissed the compla

Matter of Daniel XX. v Heather WW. (2020 NY Slip Op 01214) Matter of Daniel XX. v Heather WW. 2020 NY Slip Op 01214 Decided on February 20, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Repor

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 481 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS integrity of this document 2023.08.01 13:28:47 -05'00' DIVISION III 2023.003.20244 No. CV-20-652 Opinion Delivered December 8, 2021 SUZANNE HARDEN AND DANIEL APPEAL FROM THE FRANKLIN HARDEN

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - DANIEL SIMMONDS, as Personal